Skip to main content
Log in

Single cough urethrocystometry and clinical methods in the evaluation of female incontinent patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The type of urinary incontinence of 71 women with the complaint was evaluated clinically, and using a new single cough urethrocystometric method. On the basis of urologic history and findings in a clinical stress test, the patients were divided into four groups (stress-incontinent, stress-continent, combined-incontinent, and urge-incontinent). They were also classified into the same four categories using single cough urethrocystometry. In 60.5% of the cases, both methods resulted in the same diagnosis, but the diagnosis was different in the remainder. Urodynamic investigation resulted in an increased frequency (56%) of stress incontinence compared with the clinical diagnosis of stress incontinence (38%). Single cough urethrocystometry also revealed that the pressure transmission ratio was smaller (P<0.005) in patients with stress incontinence (65%) and combined incontinence (68%) than in those who were continent (86%) and urgecontinent (81%). Using urine leakage in a stress test as evidence of stress urinary incontinence, the sensitivity of single cough profilometry to diagnose stress incontinence was 94%, the specificity was 51%, the predictive value of an abnormal profile was 0.64, and the predictive value of a normal profile was 0.90. The new method proved to be quick and easy to perform. It has the potential to substitute for the conventional dual microtip catheter in the evaluation of urinary incontinence of female patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardozo L, Stanton SL. Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability. A clinical and urodynamic review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR. Supine urethrocystoscopic and standing cystometry as screening methods for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 57–60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Simultaneous urethrocystometry and urethra pressure profile measurement with a new technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1975; 54: 385–386

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer-Rasmussen W, Iversen Hansen R, Stage P. Predictive values of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 291–294

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne DJ, Hamilton Stewart PA, Gray BK. The role of urodynamics in the female urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1987; 59: 228–229

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thiede HA, Saini VD. Urogynecology; comments and caveats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlussler B, Hesse U, Lentsch P. Artefakte bei der Aufzeichnung des Stressprofiles und deren klinische Bedeutung. Urologe 1987; 26: 112–115

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kauppila A, Penttinen J, Haggman V-M. Six-microtransducer catheter connected to computer in evaluation of urethral closure function of women. Urology 1989; 33:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kauppila A, Alavaikko P, Kujansuu E. Detrusor instability score in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 137–141

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kujansuu E, Kauppila A. Scored urological history and urethrocystometry in the differential diagnosis of female urinary incontinence. Ann Chir Gynecol 1982; 71: 197–202

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S, Millar DR, Johnson A. An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 893–896

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR. Incontinence history as a predictor of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weprin SA, Zuspan FP. The standing cystometrogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 369–373

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kadar N. The value of bladder filling in the clinical detection of urine loss and selection of patients for urodynamic testing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 698–704

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell PH, Sephard AM, Lewis P, Feneley RCL. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis assessed urodynamically. In: Zinner NR, Sterling AM eds. Female incontinence. New York: Alan R Liss, 1980: 201–203

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson DA. Value of the cough pressure profile in the evaluation of patients with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 808–811

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Penttinen, J., Kauppila, A. Single cough urethrocystometry and clinical methods in the evaluation of female incontinent patients. Int Urogynecol J 1, 139–142 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376599

Keywords

Navigation