Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Pseudomonas syringae R25 and P. putida R105 on the growth and N2 fixation (acetylene reduction activity) of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of inoculating field peas (Pisum sativum L.) with Rhizobium leguminosarum and field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with R. phaseoli, alone or in combination with Pseudomonas syringae R25 and/or P. putida R105, were assessed under gnotobiotic conditions in growth pouches and in potted soil in a growth chamber. Inoculation of peas with P. syringae R25 or P. putida R105 alone had no effect on plant growth in pouches. In soil, however, the isolate R25 inhibited nitrogenase activity (as assessed by acetylene reduction assay) of nodules formed by indigenous rhizobia; strain R105 stimulated pea seedling emergence and nodulation. P. syringae R25 inhibited the growth of beans in either plant-growth system. P. putida R105, however, had no effects on beans in pouches, but reduced plant root biomass and nodulation by indigenous rhizobia in soil. Coinoculation of pea seeds with R. leguminosarum and either of the pseudomonads significantly (P<0.01) increased shoot, root, and total plant weight in growth pouches, but had no effect in soil. Co-inoculation of field beans with R. phaseoli and P. putida R105 had no effects on plant biomass in growth pouches or in soil, but the number of nodules and the acetylene reduction activity was significantly (P<0.01) increased in the soil. In contrast, co-inoculation of beans with rhizobia and P. syringae R25 had severe, deleterious effects on seedling mergence, plant biomass, and nodulation in soil and growth pouches. Isolate R25 was responsible for the deleterious effects observed. Although plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria may interact synergistically with root-nodulating rhizobia, the PGPR selected for one crop should be assessed for potential hazardous effects on other crops before being used as inoculants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mallah MK, Davey MR, Cocking DE (1987) Enzymatic treatment of clover root hairs removes a barrier to rhizobium—host specificity. Biotechnology 5:1319–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Alström S (1987) Factors associated with detrimental effects of rhizobacteria on plant growth. Plant and Soil 102:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcón AC, Barea JM (1978) Effects of interactions between different culture fractions of “phosphobacteria” and Rhizobium on mycorrhyzal infection, growth and nodulation of Medicago sativa. Can J Microbiol 24:520–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcón R, Azcón AC, Barea JM (1978) Effects of plant hormones present in bacterial cultures on the formation and responses to VA mycorrhiza. New Phytol 80:359–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer JE (1974) R-factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84:188–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr TJ, Schroth MN, Suslow T (1978) Increased potato yields by treatment of seed pieces with specific strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida. Phytopathology 68:1377–1383

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanway CP, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (1989) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: effects on growth and nitrogen fixation of lentil (Lens esculenta Moench) and pea (Pisum sativum L.). Soil Biol Biochem 21:511–517

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas JR, Germida JJ (1990) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for winter wheat. Can J Microbiol 36:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann J, Wollum AG II (1989) In vitro growth responses of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to soybean rhizosphere bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 21:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Germida JJ (1988) Growth of indigenous Rhizobium leguminosarum and Rhizobium meliloti in soils amended with organic nutrients. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes HD, Mount MS (1984) Influence of Pseudomonas putida on nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris. Soil Biol Biochem 16:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks PM, Loynachan TW (1989) Bacteria of the soybean rhizosphere and their effect on growth of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Soil Biol Biochem 24:561–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1938) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ Calif Agric Exp Stn No 347

  • King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Schroth MN, Miller TD (1980) Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 70:1078–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight TJ, Langston-Unkefer PJ (1988) Enhancement of symbiotic dinitrogen fixation by a toxin-releasing plant pathogen. Science 241:951–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Okon Y, Hadar Y (1987) Microbial inoculants as crop-yield enhancers. CRC Crit Rev Biotechnol 6:61–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonenko DR, Scher MF, Kloepper JW, Singleton CA, Laliberte M, Zaleska I (1987) Effects of root colonizing bacteria on nodulation of soybean roots by Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Can J Microbiol 33:498–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai R (1983) Efficacy of associative N2-fixation by streptomycin-resistant mutants of Azospirillum brasilense with genotypes of chick pea Rhizobium strains. J Agric Sci 100:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Inc, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow TV (1982) Role of root-colonizing bacteria in plant growth. In: Mount MS, Lacey G (eds) Phytopathogenic prokaryotes vol 1 Academic Press, New York, pp 187–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of root nodule bacteria. International Biological Programme Handbook 15, Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahalom E, Okon Y, Dovrat A (1987) Azospirillum effects on susceptibility to Rhizobium nodulation and on nitrogen fixation of several forage legumes. Can J Microbiol 33:510–514

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Freitas, J.R., Gupta, V.V.S.R. & Germida, J.J. Influence of Pseudomonas syringae R25 and P. putida R105 on the growth and N2 fixation (acetylene reduction activity) of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biol Fertil Soils 16, 215–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361411

Key words

Navigation