Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To establish safe levels for physical strain in occupational repetitive lifting, it is of interest to know the specific maximal working capacity. Power output, O2 consumption, heart rate and ventilation were measured in ten experienced forestry workers during maximal squat and stoop repetitive lifting. The two modes of repetitive lifting were also compared with maximal treadmill running. In addition, electromyogram (EMG) activity in four muscles was recorded and perceived central, local low-back and thigh exertion were assessed during the lifting modes. No significant difference was found in power output between the two lifting techniques. Despite this the mean O2 consumption was significantly greater during maximal squat lifting [38.7 (SD 5.8) ml·kg−1-·min−1] than maximal stoop lifting [32.9 (SD 5.7) ml·kg−1·min−1] (P<0.001). No significant correlation was found between O2 consumption (in millilitres per kilogram per minute) during maximal treadmill running and maximal stoop lifting, while O2 consumption during maximal squat lifting correlated highly with that of maximal treadmill running (r=0.928, P<0.001) and maximal stoop lifting (r=0.808, P<0.01). While maximal heart rates were significantly different among the three types of exercise, no such differences were found in the central rated perceived exertions. Perceived low-back exertion was rated significantly lower during squat lifting than during stoop lifting. The EMG recordings showed a higher activity for the vastus lateralis muscle and lower activity for the biceps femoris muscle during squat lifting than during stoop lifting. Related to the maximal voluntary contraction, the erector spinae muscle showed the highest activity irrespective of lifting technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrand I (1960) Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special references to age. Acta Physiol Scand [49 Suppl] 169:64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrand P-O, Rodahl K (1988) Textbook of work physiology; physiological bases for exercise, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 501–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian JV, de Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive. Their function revealed by electromyography. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2–3:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg G (1982) A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In: Geisler HG, Petzold P (eds) Psychophysical judgement and the process of perception. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaft, Berlin, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg G, Ljunggren G, Ceci R (1985) The increase of perceived exertion, aches in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchfuhrer MJ, Hansen JE, Robinson TE, Sue DY, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1983) Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment. J Appl Physiol 55:1558–1564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cafarelli E (1977) Peripheral and central inputs to the effort sense during cycling exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 37:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom B, Goldberg AN (1971) The influence of training and other factors on the subjective rating of perceived exertion. Acta Physiol Scand 83:399–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JE, Marley RJ, Stubbs NB (1987) Lifting physical work capacity as a function of frequency. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Human Factor Society, Santa Monica, Calif., pp 1331–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd WF, Silver PHS (1955) The function of the erector spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man. J Physiol 129:184–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale F (1972) Perceived exertion, heart rate, oxygen uptake and blood lactate in different work operations. Ergonomics 15:545–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Saxena U (1979) Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 40:894–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson TH, Bigos SJ, Wortley MK, Spengler DM (1984) The load on the lumbar spine during isometric strength testing. Spine 9:720–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms-Ringdahl K (1986) On assessment of shoulder exercise and load-elicited pain in the cervical spine. Biomechanical analysis of load-EMG-methodological studies of pain provoked by extreme position. Thesis, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm. Scand J Rehabil Med 18 [Suppl 14]

    Google Scholar 

  • Intaranont K, Ayoub MM, Bobo WM, Smith JL (1986) Physical lifting capacity: the anaerobic threshold approach. In: Karwowski W (ed) Trends in ergonomics/human factors III. Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, pp 835–846

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) (1962) Manual lifting and carrying. International Occupational Safety Health Information Sheet no. 3. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil TM, Genaidy AM, Asfour SS, Vinciguerra T (1985) Physiological limits in lifting. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 46:220–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Marras WS (1987) Quantitative trunk muscle electromyography during lifting at different speeds. Int J Ind Ergon 1:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1983) Work practices guide for manual lifting. Publication no. 81-122. NIOSH, Cincinatti, Ohio, pp 23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Németh G, Ekholm J, Arborelius UP (1984) Hip load moments and muscular activity during lifting. Scand J Rehabil Med 16:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandolf KB, Burse RL, Goldman RF (1975) Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical conditioning of older individuals using leg-weight loading. Percept Mot Skills 40:563–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrofsky JS, Lind AR (1978a) Comparison of metabolic and ventilatory responses of men to various lifting tasks and bicycle ergometry. J Appl Physiol 45:60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrofsky JS, Lind AR (1978b) Metabolic, cardiovascular, and respiratory factors in the development of fatigue in lifting tasks. J Appl Physiol 45:4–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenburg R, Seidel H (1989) Electromyography of lumbar erector spinae muscles - influence of posture, interelectrode distance, strength, and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol 59:104–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp MA, Harman E, Vogel JA, Knapik JJ, Legg SJ (1988) Maximal aerobic capacity for repetitive lifting: comparison with three standard exercise modes. Eur J Appl Physiol 57:753–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Versteeg PGA, Kippersluis GJ (1989) Automated systems for measurement of oxygen uptake during exercise testing. Int J Sports Med 10:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbergen E, Kemper HGC, Knibbe JJ, Toussaint HM, Clysen L (1991) Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies. Ergonomics 34:613–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CA, Petrofsky JS, Lind AR (1982) Physiological responses of women during lifting exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuxiang Z, Zhijun Z (1990) Maximum acceptable lifting workload by Chinese subjects. Ergonomics 33:875–884

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagen, K.B., Hallen, J. & Harms-Ringdahl, K. Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique. Eur J Appl Physiol 67, 291–297 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357625

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357625

Key words

Navigation