Summary
Four species of grassland plant, Plantago lanceolata, Holcus lanatus, Lolium perenne and Rumex acetosa, were grown as monocultures and mixtures in pots of nutrient poor soil in a glasshouse for 8 months. There were four plants per pot and these were arranged in two competition modes: either root and shoot interactions were permitted, or only roots allowed to interact by using above-ground partitions. Time of introduction of seedlings was varied to give a range of plant size ratios at the start of the experiment. The factorial design catered for all combinations of species, competition modes and planting times, replicated in four blocks. The shoots were clipped at a fixed height at each of five harvests. Rumex grew badly and was mostly omitted from analysis of the data.
By (i) following the change in the relationship of clip dry weights against planting time with successive harvests, (ii) plotting the change in the logarithm of the ratio of cumulative clip dry weights with time and (iii) the use of de Wit logarithmic ratio plots it was demonstrated that each monoculture and mixture combination's ratios of plant weights converged towards stable equilibrium values. Three hypotheses are put forward to explain why in monocultures a smaller plant was at a competitive advantage relative to a larger neighbour and was not suppressed in its growth by the latter. In mixtures this plant size effect was superimposed to different extents on the relative aggressiveness of the species considered. It was concluded that in a nutrient poor soil, when competition for light was low, root interactions can promote the co-existence of neighbouring plant species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, R.E., Newman, E.I.: Root density and competition for nutrients. Oecol. Plant 5, 319–334 (1970)
Asher, C.J., Loneragan, J.F.: Response of plants to phosphate concentration in solution cultures. I. Growth and phosphorus content. Soil Sci. 103, 225–233 (1967)
Atkinson, D.: Some general effects of phosphorus deficiency on growth and development. New Phytol. 72, 101–111 (1973)
Bergh, J.B. van den: An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands. Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. Ned. 714, 1–71 (1968)
Black J.N.: Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and light microclimate. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 299–318 (1958)
Eagles, C.F.: Competition for light and nutrients between natural populations of Dactylis glomerata. J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 141–151 (1972)
Ford, E.D.: Competition and stand structure in some even aged monocultures. J. Ecol. 63, 311–333 (1975)
Campbell, R., Rovira, A.: The study of the rhizosphere by scanning electron microscopy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 747–752 (1973)
Donald, C.M.: The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 421–435 (1958)
Grime, J.P.: Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature (Lond.) 242, 344–347 (1973)
Harper, J.L.: Approaches to the study of plant competition. In: Mechanisms in biological competition. Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol. 15, 1–39 (1961)
Harper, J.L.: The nature and consequence of interference among plants. Proc. XI. Int. Congr. of Genetics, The Hague, Vol. 2, pp. 465–482. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1965
Harper, J.L.: A Darwinian approach to plant ecology. J. Ecol. 55, 247–270 (1967)
Hewitt, E.J.: Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Tech. Communication No. 22 of Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation Crops (E. Malling), Maidstone, Kent (1952)
King, J.: Competition between established and newly sown grass species. J. Br. Grassld. Soc. 26, 221–229 (1971)
McGilchrist, C.A., Trenbath, B.R.: A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27, 659–671 (1971)
Naylor, R.E.L.: Changes in the structure of plant populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 13, 513–521 (1976)
Newbery, D. McC.: Allelopathic and competitive interactions among some plants common in neutral grassland. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol (1976)
Newman, E.I.: Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature (Lond.) 244, 310 (1973)
Newman, E.I., Rovira, A.: Allelopathy among some British grassland species. J. Ecol. 63, 727–737 (1975)
O'Neill, J.V., Webb, R.A.: Simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plant material by automatic methods. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 21, 217–219 (1970)
Ozanne, P.G., Keay, S., Biddiscombe, E.F. The comparative applied phosphate requirements of eight annual pasture species. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 20, 809–818 (1969)
Rhodes, I.: The growth and development of some grass species under competitive stress. III. The nature of competitive stress and characters associated with competitive ability during seedling growth. J. Br. Grassld. Soc. 23, 330–335 (1968)
Ross, M.A., Harper, J.L.: Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60, 77–88 (1972)
Siegel, S.: Non-parametric statistics for behavioural sciences, 312 pp. Tokyo: McGraw Hill, Kogakusha 1956
Wilson, J.B.: Nutritive and competitive relations between upland grasses. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of Wales (1970)
Wit, C.T. de: On competition. Versl. Landbouwk, Onderz, Ned. 66, 1–82 (1960)
Wit, C.T. de, Bergh, J.P. van den: Competition between herbage plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13, 212–221 (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newbery, D.M., Newman, E.I. Competition between grassland plants of different initial sizes. Oecologia 33, 361–380 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348119
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348119