Skip to main content
Log in

Why laparoscopic cholecystectomy today?

  • Contributions From Hungary
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional open cholecystectomy became the “gold standard” of surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease during the last century. In spite of its good results, clinicians have been trying to establish effective nonsurgical methods of eliminating gallstones. Although oral, percutaneous, or retrograde litholysis can be used effectively for cholesterol stones, these represent only 10% of all gallstones. Moreover, intracorporeal lithotripsy is an invasive method, and while extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a promising procedure, even after careful selection, only 70%–80% of the patients become stone-free within 1 year. In fact, none of the methods which leave the gallbladder intact are free of complications, and they are followed by 50% stone recurrence within 5 years. Since 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice as it is safe and only minimally invasive. We believe that the laparoscopic technique is a promising way to the surgery of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rewbridge AG (1937) The disappearance of gallstone shadows following prolonged administration of bile salts. Surgery 1:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston CG, Nakayama F (1957) Solubility of cholesterol and gallstones in metabolic material. Arch Surg 75:436–442

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danzinger RG, Hofmann AF, Schoenfield JL, Thistle JL (1972) Dissolution of cholesterol gallstones by chenodeoxycholic acid. N Engl J Med 286:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iwasaki T (1936) Über die Konstitution der Ursodesoxycholsäure. Z Physiol Chem 244:181–193

    Google Scholar 

  5. Makino I, Shinozaki K, Yoshino K, Nakagawa S (1975) Dissolution of cholesterol gallstones by ursodeoxycholic acid. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi (Jpn J Gastroenterol) 72:690–702

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smit JWA, Erpecum KJ, Stolk MFJ (1992) Successful dissolution of cholesterol gallstone during treatment with pravastatin. Gastroenterology 103:1068–1070

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allen MJ, Borody TJ, Bugliosi TF, May GR, Larussoi NF, Thistle JL (1985) Cholelitholysis using methyl tertiary butyl ether. Gastroenterology 88:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leuschner U, Hellstern A, Ansell A, Gatzen M (1994) Manual and automatic gallstone dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether. Dig Dis Sci 39:1302–1308

    Google Scholar 

  9. Swobodnik W, Ditschuneit H, Soloway RD (1990) Gallstone disease. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moriyasu A, Ise H, Noriyoshi S, Matsuno S (1994) Treatment of cholelithiasis with acetylcysteine, a new gallstone solvent. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 1:406–412

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foerster EC, Bühler H, Domschke W (1989) Direct dissolution of gallbladder stones. Lancet 1(8644):954

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inui K, Nakazawa S, Naito Y, Kimoto E, Yamao K (1988) Nonsurgical treatment of cholecystolithiasis with percutaneous transhepatic cholecystoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 83:1124–1127

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kellett MJ, Whickham JEA, Russell RCG (1988) Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy. Br Med J 296:453–455

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sauerbruch T, Delius M, Paumgartner G (1986) Fragmentation of gallstone by extracorporeal shock waves. Gastroenterology 96:818–822

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sackmann M, Delius M (1988) Shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. N Engl J Med 318:393–397

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malet PF, Wisniewski F, Laufer I (1993) Improved results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Dornier MPL 9000 for single gallstones. J Stone Dis 5:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  17. Becker CD, Quenville NF, Burhenne HJ (1988) Long-term occlusion of the porcine cystic duct by means of endoluminal radiofrequency electrocoagulation. Radiology 167:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker CD, Fache JS, Malone DE, Stoller JE, Burhenne HJ (1990) Ablation of the cystic duct and the gallbladder: clinical observations. Radiology 176:687–690

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ji ZL, Li H, Chen HR, Wang FC, Yang DT, Wang NR, Gao NR, Yang JZ (1994) Endoscopic chemical ablation of the gallbladder. Br J Surg 81:1193–1194

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1989) Coeliscopic cholecystectomy. Presse Med 18:980–983

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement (1992) vol 10, no 3, Sept 10–16

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandor, J., Sandor, A., Zaborszky, A. et al. Why laparoscopic cholecystectomy today?. Surg Today 26, 556–560 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311567

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311567

Key Words

Navigation