Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes

VIII. Localization of homologous chromosomes

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The spatial relationships between the homologous pairs of chromosomes in the normal human colcemid-treated metaphase plate were tested by two different mathematical approaches: (a) determination of the distances between the centromeres of the homologous chromosomes compared to the mean distance of all centromeres of the mitosis in question; (b) measuring the distances of the different chromosomes from the center of the mitosis.

The following results were obtained: (1) The arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes does not follow a normal distribution; the distribution is narrower and taller, probably due to an impairment of free chromosome spreading by the cell membrane. We believe that only in ‘membraneless’ mitotic cells should the chromosome-spread correspond to a normal distribution under the same preparation conditions. (2) There is a positive correlation between decreasing chromosome size and decreasing mean distance between homologous chromosomes. (3) A close positive correlation exists between increasing chromosome size and increasing distance to the barycenter of the mitosis. (4) There is also a close positive correlation between the distance of homologous chromosome pairs and their distance from the center of the mitosis, i.e., with increasing distance from the center of the mitosis, the distance between the homologous partners increases. (5) The following statistically significant deviations from these rules could be established: (a) The large acrocentric chromosomes are closer associated, as one would expect from their size, probably due to their participation in the nucleolus organization; (b) in the female cell one of the two X chromosomes has an extremely peripheral localization; the X chromosomes are furthest apart of all pairs of homologous chromosomes; (c) the chromosome pairs 6 and 8 are relatively close together in spite of their peripheral position, suggesting a truc close association of the homologus partners; (d) the chromosome pair 18 has a more peripheral position than expected, and a relatively large mean distance between the homologous partners; (e) the chromosome pair 1 has a much more central position and a closer association than is expected from its size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbo G, Zellweger H, Cuany R (1966) Satellite association in familial mosaicism. Helv Paediatr Acta 21:293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki DT, Sparkes RS (1963) Microtechnique for culturing leucocytes from whole blood. Cytogenetics 2:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi L, Feldman M, Bushuk W (1969) The mechanism of somatic association in common wheat, Triticum aestivum L. I. Suppression of somatic association by colchicine. Genetics 62:745–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi L, Feldman M, Bushuk W (1970) The mechanism of somatic association in common wheat, Triticum aestivum L. II. Differential affinity for colchicine of spindle microtubules of plants having different doses of the somatic association suppressor. Genetics 65:585–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi L, Feldman M, Bushuk W (1970) The mechanism of somatic association in common wheat, Triticum aestivum L. III. Differential affinity for nucleotides of spindle microtubules of plants having different doses of the somatic association suppressor. Genetics 66:449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Back E, Zang KD (1969) Untersuchungen über die Anordnung der menschlichen Metaphasechromosomen. III. Assoziationsmuster akrozentrischer Chromosomen bei Müttern mongoloider Kinder und bei Vergleichspersonen. Hum Genet 8:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Back E, Zang KD (1969) Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. II. Influence of the preparation technique on the association pattern of the acrocentric chromosomes. Cytogenetics 8:304–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton DE, David FN (1962) The analysis of chromosome patterns in the normal cell. Ann Hum Genet 25:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton DE, David FN, Merrington M (1964) The positions of the sex chromosomes in the human cell in mitosis. Ann Hum Genet 28:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton DE, David FN, Merrington M (1965) The relative positions of the chromosomes in human cell mitoses. Ann Hum Genet 29: 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi NO, De Bianchi MS (1969) Y chromosome replication and chromosomes arrangement in germ line cells and sperms of the rat. Chromosoma 28:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra HS, Narayana AKA, Buche VV, Hungerford DA (1972) Peripheral location of the human late X and homologous association of autosomes numbers one, two and three. J Genet Hum 61: 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Church K (1977) Chromosome ends and the nuclear envelope at premeiotic interphase in the male grasshopper Brachystola magna by 3-D-EM reconstruction. Chromosoma 64:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MM, Shaw MW (1967) The association of acrocentric chromosomes in 1000 normal human male metaphases. Ann Hum Genet 31:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll DM, Cuadras CM, Egozcue J (1980) Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphaso plate. Symmetrical arrangement in human male cells. Genet Res 36:219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings DE (1968) The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Ann J Hum Genet 20:440–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings DE (1980) Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (1971) Non-random participation of chromosomes 13, 14 and 15 in acrocentric associations. Hum Genet 13:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (1972) Patterns of secondary associations between the acrocentric autosomes in man. Chromosoma 36:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P, Curtis DJ (1974) General and specific patterns of acrocentric associations in parents of mongol children. Hum Genet 23:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton JE, Kaplan AR (1973) Acrocentric chromosomes in cultured leucocytes from mothers of children affected with the G1 trisomy syndrome. Am J Ment Defic 78:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer T, Cremer C, Baumann H, Zorn C (1980) Elucidation of the spatial arrangement of interphase chromosomes in the Chinese hamster cell nucleus by a laser microbeam approach. Int Chromosome Conference VII:35

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis DJ (1974) Acrocentric associations in mongol populations. Hum Genet 22:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Defrise-Gussenhoven E (1955) Mesure de divergence Δ2 entre un sujet déterminé et une population multivariée normale. Sa distribution d'èchantillonnage. Bull Inst Roy Soc Nat Belgique 56:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JH (1961) Chromosomal association in man. Lancet ii:317–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M (1966) The effect of chromosomes 5B, 5D and 5A on chromosome pairing in Triticum aestivum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 55:1447–1453

    Google Scholar 

  • Froland A, Mikkelsen M (1964) Studies on satellite associations in human cells Hereditas 52:248

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell CP (1975) The position of interphase chromosomes and late replicating DNA in centromere and telomere regions of Allium cepa L. Chromosoma 50:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin H (1968a) Comparative study of the association of human acrocentric chromosomes in male and female mitoses. Cytogenetics 7:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin H (1968b) General distribution of the 46 chromosomes in human metaphase plates. Hum Genet 6:118–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin H (1969a) Number of each type of acrocentric association and probability its occurrence in human male and female metaphase cells. Cytogenetics 8:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin H (1969b) Relative positions of homologous chromosomes or groups in male and female metaphase figures. Hum Genet 7:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin H, Ros Y (1966) Choix d'une methode de mesure de chromosomes humains. Hum Genet 2:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin-Lemaitre H, Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M, Hayez F, Susanne C (1976) Nonrandomness of associations between trypsin-banded acrocentrics. Int Congr Ser 397:125

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin-Lemaitre H, Hens L, Kirch-Volders M, Susanne C (1977) Nonrandom association of trypsin banded human acrocentric chromosomes. Hum Genet 35:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraedts JPM, Pearson PL (1975) Spatial distribution of chromosomes 1 and Y in human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 45:515–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropp A, Odunjo F (1963) Beobachtungen zur morphologischen Konkordanz homologer chromosomen somatischer Zellen. Exp Cell Res 30:577–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson A, Mikkelsen M (1974) An increased tendency to satellite association of human chromosome 21: A factor in the aethiology of Down's syndrome. IRCS (Research on: anatomy and human biology, pediatrics and perinatal medicine, psychiatry and clinical psychology) 2:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M, Susanne C, Galperin-Lemaitre H (1975) Relative positions of trypsin-banded homologous chromosomes in human female metaphase figures. Hum Genet 28:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M, Susanne C (1976) Analysis of centromerecentre generalized distances in human lymphocytes. Int Congr Ser 397:129

    Google Scholar 

  • Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M Susanne C (1981) the orderly arrangement of chromosomes in human metaphase figures. Int Congr Human Genet IV:114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo JJ, Cramer H (1971) On the position of chromosomes in prepared mitosis figures of human fibroblasts. Hum Genet 13:166–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA (1961) A study of the chromosomes in leucocytes from the peripheral blood of children with leukemia. PhD Thesis Univ Pennsylvania

  • Hungerford DA (1964) Observations on the morphology and behavior of normal human chromosomes. In: Pavan C, Frota-Pessoa O, Caldas CR (eds) Mammalian cytogenetics and related problems in radiobiology. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiossoglou KA, Rosenbaum EH, Mitus WJ, Dameshek W (1964) Multiple chromosome aberrations in a patient with acute granulocytic leukemia associated with Down's syndrome and twinning. Blood 24:134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch-Volders M, Hens L, Susanne C, Galperin-Lemaitre H (1977) Stability of centromere-center distances in normal human metaphases. Cytogenet Cell Genet 18:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch-Volders M, Hens L, Van den Berghe H, Scholberg B, Susanne C (1982) Chromosome distribution studies in XXY karyotypes. J Med Genet (to be published)

  • Korf BR, Diacumacos EG (1980) Absence of true interchromosomal connectives in microsurgically isolated chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 130:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf BR, Diacumacos EG (1978) Microsurgically extracted metaphase chromosomes of the Indian muntjac examined with phase contrast and scanning electron microscopy. Exp Cell Res 111:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarzyk H, Steinhaus H, Szymaniec S (1965) Arrangement of chromosomes in human cells. I. Association in metaphase figures. Bull Acad Pol Sci (Biol) VI:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarzyk H, Steinhaus H, Szymaniec S (1966) Arrangement of chromosomes in human cells. II. Distribution in metaphase figures. Bull Acad Pol Sci (Biol) VI:401–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarzyk H, Steinhaus H, Szymaniec S (1966) Arrangement of chromosomes in human cells. III. Distribution of centromeres and orientation of chromosomes in metaphase disk. Bull Acad Pol Sci (Biol) XI:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarzyk H, Steinhaus H, Szymaniec S (1968) Arrangement of chromosomes in human cells. VI. General aspect. Bull Acad Pol Sci (Biol) XVI:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons RB, Thompson H, Bigley RH (1965) The sticky chromosome syndrome. Proc Am Soc Hum Genet 20:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei JF, Mattei MG, Ayme S, Giraud F (1974) Acrocentric associations in parents of mongol children. Hum Genet 25:29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott A (1971) Human male meiosis: Chromosome behaviour at premeiotic and meiotic stages of spermatogenesis. Can J Genet Cytol 13:536–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrington M, Penrose LS (1964) Distances which involve satellited chromosomes in metaphase preparations. Ann Hum Genet 27:257–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller OJ, Mukherjee BB, Breg WR, Camble A, Van N (1963) Nonrandom distribution of chromosomes in metaphase figures from cultured human leucocytes. I. The peripheral position of the Y chromosome. Cytogenetics 2:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagome Y (1969) DNA replication studies in human D-group chromosomes in satellite associations. Cytogenetics 8:296–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagome Y (1973) G-group chromosomes in satellite associations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:336–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor AF, Warburton D, Warburton FE (1973) Spatial relationships of human chromosomes identified by Quinacrine fluorescence at metaphase. II. Analysis of variance of intercentromeric distances. Hum Genet 18:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockey CH (1969) The position of chromosomes at metaphase in human fibroblasts and their DNA synthesis behaviour. Chromosoma 27:308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S, Truyillo JM, Kaplan WD, Kinosita R (1961) Nucleolus organizers in the causation of chromosomal anomalies in man. Lancet i:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil SR, Lubs HA (1971) Non-random association of human acrocentric chromosomes. Hum Genet 13:157–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen GB, Therkelsen AJ (1961) Observations on satellited human chromosomes. Lancer i:1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman TC, Flehinger BJ, Squire RD (1978) Patterns of association in the human metaphase complement: Ring analysis and estimation of associativity of specific chromosome regions. Hum Genet 40:19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodman TC, Flehinger BJ, Rohlf FJ (1980) Metaphase chromosome associations: colcemid distorts the pattern. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:98–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz W, Fleck S (1969) Die Bedeutung der Assoziation satellitentragender Chromosomen. Hum Genet 7:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz W, Holzer S (1972) Satellite association. A possible cause of chromosome aberrations. Hum Genet 16:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidermann LJ, Smith AB (1962) Nonrandom distribution of certain homologous pairs of normal human chromosomes in metaphase. Nature 22:1229–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Sele B (1974) Contribution a l'etude des associations spatiales entre chromosomes homologues sur la plaque metaphase humaine. Donnees fournies par les nouvelles methodes d'identification chromosomique. These Med, Grenoble

  • Sele B, Jalbert P, Van Cutsem B, Lucas M, Moriquand C (1976) Chromosome proximities on the metaphase plate. Excerpta Med Int Congr Ser: 397 Exc Med, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sele B, Jalbert P, Van Cutsem B, Lucas M, Moriquand C (1977) Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphase plate using banding techniques. Hum Genet 39:39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw MW (1961) Association of acrocentric chromosomes with the centromere region of chromosome No. 1. Lancet i:1351–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw MW, Craig AP, Ricutti FC (1969) Random association of human acrocentric chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 21:513–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaeter M (1975) Nichtzufällige Verteilung homologer Chromosomen (Nr. 9 und YY) im Interphasekern menschlicher Fibroblasten. Hum Genet 27:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaeter M, Schwarzacher HG (1975) Die Anordnung der Chromosomen innerhalb des Zellkerns. Anat Anz 138:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence MA, Francke U, Forsythe AB, (1973) Evidence against the peripheral location of the Y chromosome in human metaphase cells. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT, Evans HJ, Buckland RA (1971) New technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nature New Biol 232:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sved JA (1976) Hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster: a possible explanation in term of spatial organization of chromosomes. Aust J Biol Sci 29:375–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Taysi K (1975) Satellite association: Giemsa banding studies in parents of Down's syndrome patients. Clin Genet 8:319–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishler PV, Rosner B, Lamborot-Manzur M, Atkins L (1974) Studies on the localization of the Y fluorescent body in human interphase nuclei. Hum Genet 22:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brink JM, Los PL, Nienhaus AJ (1962), Satellite associations and the identification of the Y chromosome in man. Genetika 33:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton D, Naylor AF, Warburton FE (1973) Spatial relationships of human chromosomes identifies by Quinacrine fluorescence at metaphase. I. Mean interchromosomal distances and distances from the cell center. Hum Genet 18:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber E (1972) Grundriß der biologischen Statistik. Fischer Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg C (1979) Untersuchungen über die Anordnung menschlicher Chromosomen. PhD Thesis, Saarbrücken

  • Wollenberg C, Kiefaber MP, Zang KD (1981) The arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes with and without spindle apparatus. Int Congr Hum Genet VI:122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg C, Kiefaber MP, Zang KD (1982) Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. IX. Arrangement with and without spindle apparatus. Hum Genet (to be published)

  • Zang KD, Back E (1967) Individual satellite association patterns. Lancet ii:1423

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang KD, Back, E (1968) Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. I. Individual features in the association patterns of acrocentric chromosomes of normal males and females. Cytogenetics 7:455–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger H, Abbo G, Guani R (1966) Satellite associations and translocation mongolism. J Med Genet 3:186–189

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Univ.-Kliniken, Institut für Humangenetik der Universität des Saarlandes, Bau 68, 6650, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany

    C. Wollenberg, M. P. Kiefaber & K. D. Zang

Authors
  1. C. Wollenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. P. Kiefaber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. D. Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wollenberg, C., Kiefaber, M.P. & Zang, K.D. Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 60, 239–248 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303011

Keywords

Search

Navigation