Skip to main content
Log in

The spatial distribution of chromosomes in metaphase neuroblast cells from subspecific F1 hybrids of the grasshopper Caledia captiva

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial distribution of chromosomes has been analysed in radial metaphase neuroblast cells in F1 hybrid embryos generated by crossing individuals of the Moreton and Torresian (TT) chromosomal taxa of the grasshopper Caledia captiva. The Moreton individuals were of two kinds depending on whether they carried an acrocentric X (MAX) or a metacentric X (MMX). No significant associations were detected between any pair of homologous chromosomes in either male or female (MAX x TT) and (MMX x TT) F1 hybrids. This result was supported by data which showed that the mean separation between homologues is greater, although not significantly so, than the mean separation between non-homologous chromosomes within the two Moreton genomes. Indeed, in a number of cases, genome separation was clearly observed in radial metaphase preparations from these F1 hybrids. By comparison the analysis of pairwise associations between non-homologous chromosomes within the MMX and MAX Moreton genomes revealed a number of significant associations and dissociations which strongly suggests that at least some chromosomes in these genomes are organised non-randomly at metaphase. Of particular interest was the highly significant X-5 association in the MMX genome since in a previous study X-5 rearrangements were found to occur repeatedly among different backcross progeny involving Moreton x Torresian F1 hybrids. Additionally a comparison of the organisation of chromosomes in the MAX and MMX genomes, which differ primarily by the type of X chromosome, revealed that in a number of cases pairs of chromosomes are arranged very differently with respect to each other. The distribution of chromosomes on the hollow spindle was also analysed to investigate whether a specific spatial ordering of chromosomes exists within these Moreton genomes based on the association of pairs of short arms and pairs of long arms of most similar length (the Bennett model). The twelve chromosomes in both genomes were uniquely ordered in a single chain. However, because of computing limitations, only the ordered arrangement of chromosomes 1–10 was investigated. An analysis of 48 cells in the MMX and 38 cells in the MAX genomes showed that the predicted order in the ten chromosome sub-set in each genome did not rank in the top 20% of the 181,440 possible orders. This suggests that, although there is a good evidence that some non-homologous chromosomes may be associated non-randomly at metaphase in these genomes, they do not appear to show a specific, ordered arrangement as predicted by the Bennett model. The significance of the observed non-random organisation of chromosomes in the MMX and MAX genomes is discussed in relation to the generation of novel chromosome rearrangements in Moreton x Torresian F1 hybrids and the evolution of the Moreton and Torresian genomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley T (1979) Specific end-to-end attachment of chromosomes of Ornithogalum urens. J Cell Sci 38:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Wagnaar EB (1972) End-to-end attachment of haploid chromosomes of Ornithogalum urens. Can J Genet Cytol 14:716–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Wagenaar EB (1974) Telomeric associations of genetic and somatic chromosomes in diploid and autotetraploid Ornithogalum urens. Can J Genet Cytol 16:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi L, Feldman M (1980) Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Hum Genet 55:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi L, Feldman M, Brown M (1982) An ordered arrangement of chromosomes in the somatic nucleus of common wheat, Triticum alsturum L. I. Spatial relationships between chromosomes of the same genome. Chromosoma 86:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bammi RK, Shoffner RN, Haiden CJ (1966) Non-random association of somatic chromosomes in the chicken-Coturnix quail hybrid and the parental species. Can J Genet Cytol 8:537–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD (1982) The nucleotypic basis of the spatial ordering of chromosomes in eukaryotes and the implications of the order for genome evolution and phenotypic variation. In: Dover GA, Flavell RB (eds) Genome evolution. Academic Press, London, pp 239–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD (1983) The spatial distribution of chromosomes. Proc 2nd Kew Chromosome Conf. In: Brandham P, Bennett MD (eds). G. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciejek EM, Tasai M, O'Malley BW (1983) Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature 306:607–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates DJ, Shaw DD (1982) The chromosomal component of reproductive isolation in the grasshopper Caledia captiva. I. Meiotic analysis of chiasma distribution patterns in two chromosomal taxa and their F1 hybrids. Chromosoma 86:509–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MM, Enis P, Pfiefer CG (1972) An investigation of somatic pairing in the muntjak (Muntiacus muntjak). Cytogenetics 11:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings DE (1980) Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey NL, Driscoll CJ (1972) Evidence against somatic association in hexaploid wheat. Chromosoma 36:140–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak J, Knott DR (1973) A study of somatic association of wheat chromosomes. Can J Genet Cytol 15:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KJ, Filion WG (1982) The distribution of chromatin in the interphase nucleus of Zebrina pendula. Can J Genet Cytol 24:583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch RA, Bennett MD (1983) The mechanism of somatic chromosome elimination in Hordeum. Proc. 2nd Kew Chromosome Conf. Brandham P, Bennett MD (eds) G. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch RA, Smith JB, Bennett MD (1981) Hordeum and Secale mitotic genomes lie apart in hybrid. J Cell Sci 52:391–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox DP, Mello-Sompayo T, Carter KC (1975) Chromosome distribution in neuroblast metaphase cells of Locusta migratoria L. Chromosoma 53:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell CP (1975) The position of interphase chromosomes and late replicating DNA in centromere and telomere regions of Allium cepa L. Chromosoma 50:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Roy SC (1977) Orientation of interphase chromosomes as detected by Giemsa C-bands. Chromosoma 61:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg T, Levis R, Rubin GM (1984) Transformation of white locus DNA in Drosophila: dosage compensation, zeste interaction and position effects. Cell 36:469–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneen WK, Nichols WW (1972) Nonrandom arrangement of metaphase chromosomes in cultured cells of the Indian deer, Muntiacus muntjak. Cytogenetics 11:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison JS (1982) Chromosome disposition in Aegilops umbellulata. Proc 2nd Kew Chromosome Conf. Brandham P, Bennett MD (eds) G. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1983a) The spatial order of chromosomes of root tip metaphases of Aegilops umbellulata. Proc R Soc Lond B218:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1983b) Prediction and analysis of spatial order in haploid chromosome complements. Proc R Soc Lond B218:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Juricek DK (1975) Non-random chromosome distribution in radial metaphases from the Chinese hamster. Chromosoma 50:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf BR, Diacumakos EG (1977) Radom arrangement of mitotic chromosomes in radial metphases of the Indian muntjac. Cytogenet Cell Genet 19:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson GM, Knoll BJ, March CJ, Woo SLL, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW (1982) Definition of 5′ structural and 3′ structural boundaries of the chromosome domain containing the ovalbumin multigene family. J Biol Chem 257:1501–1507

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1981) Do chromosomes cross talk? Science 214:1334–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire MP (1983) Homologous chromosome pairing remains an unsolved problem: A test of a popular hypothesis utilizing maize meiosis. Genetics 104:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx JL (1983) Specific expression of transferred genes. Science 222:1001–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott A (1971) Human male meiosis: Chromosome behaviour at pre-meiotic and meiotic stages of spermatogenesis. Can J Genet Cytol 13:536–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran C (1981) Spermatogenesis in natural and experimental hybrids between chromosomally differentiated taxa of Caledia captiva. Chromosoma 81:579–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran C, Shaw DD (1977) Population cytogenetics of the genus Caledia (Orthoptera:Acridinae). III. Chromosomal polymorphism, racial porapatry and introgression. Chromosoma 63:181–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur U (1973) Random arrangement of chromosomes in a radial metaphase configuration. Chromosoma 40:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin CM, Spradling AC (1982) Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218:348–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DD, Wilkinson P (1980) Chromosome cdifferentiation, hybrid breakdown and the maintenance of a narrow hybrid zone in Caledia. Chromosoma 80:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DD, Wilkinson P, Coates DJ (1983) Increased chromosomal mutation rate after hybridization between two subspecies of grasshoppers. Science 220:1165–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RJ, Röbbelen G, Okamoto M (1976) Somatic association at interphase studied by Giemsa banding techniques. Chromosoma 56:265–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradling AC, Rubin GM (1982) Transposition of clone P elements in Drosophila germ line chromosomes. Science 218:341–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradling AC, Rubin GM (1983) The effect of chromosomal position on the expression of Drosophila xanthine dehydrogenase gene. Cell 34:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack S, Clarke C (1973) Differential giemsa staining of the telomeres of Allium cepa chromosomes: observations related to chromosome pairing. Can J Genet Cytol 15:619–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack S, Clarke C (1974) Chromosome polarization and nuclear rotation in Allium cepa roots. Cytologia 39:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack S, Brown D, Dewey W (1977) Visualization of interphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci 26:281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar EB (1969) End to end chromosome attachments in mitotic interphase and their possible significance to meitotic chromosome pairing. Chromosoma 26:410–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb GC (1976) Chromosome organisation in the Australian plague locust, chortoicetes terminifera. 1. Banding relationships of the normal and supernumerary chromosomes. Chromosoma 55:229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge University Press

  • White MJD (1975) Chromosomal repatterning — regularities and restrictions. Genetics 79:63–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coates, D.J., Smith, D. The spatial distribution of chromosomes in metaphase neuroblast cells from subspecific F1 hybrids of the grasshopper Caledia captiva . Chromosoma 90, 338–348 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294160

Keywords

Navigation