Abstract
This study examined the effects of the victim-perpetrator relationship on college students' attributions of responsibility for rape. In addition, the rape specificity of these attributions was investigated. College females and males read one of six scenarios that depicted a rape or a proposition, and that varied according to the victim-perpetrator relationship (steady dating partners/acquaintances on a first date/strangers). Then they rated seven responsibility attributions for the rape or proposition. Results indicated that most forms of victim responsibility were stronger for the rape and proposition on a date than for the incidents between strangers, and the findings concerning the perpetrator's responsibility were mixed. The pattern of both victim- and perpetrator-responsibility attributions suggests that both a rape and proposition on a date, compared to incidents between strangers, elicit stronger sex role and sexual attributions. Moreover, male subjects, in comparison to female subjects, gave higher ratings to several responsibility attributions, and these, also, are linked to sex role and sexual considerations. Further, the data revealed that only the perpetrator-responsibility attributions were stronger for the rape than the proposition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, A. Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42, 830–838.
Abbey, A., & Melby, C. The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perception of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 283–298.
Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 179–193.
Bridges, J. S. Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex-role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1989.
Burt, M. R. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 217–230.
Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Selby, J. W. Attributing responsibility to the victim of rape: Influence of information regarding past sexual experience. Human Relations, 1979, 32, 57–67.
Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 344–356.
Cherry, F. Gender roles and sexual violence. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1983.
Clark, L., & Lewis, D. The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Women's Press, 1977.
Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 63–75.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Gibson, R. H. Sex-role attitudes: 1972–1980. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 656–663.
Jean, P. J., & Reynolds, C. R. Sex and attitude distortion: Ability of females and males to fake liberal and conservative positions regarding changing sex roles. Sex Roles, 1984, 10, 805–815.
Johnson, J. D., & Jackson, L. E., Jr. Assessing the effects of factors that might underlie the differential perceptions of acquaintance and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 1988, 19, 37–45.
Jones, C., & Aronson, E. Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 1973, 26, 415–419.
Karuza, J. Jr., & Carey, T. O. Relative preference and adaptiveness of behavioral blame for observers of rape victims. Journal of Personality, 1984, 52, 249–260.
Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1988, 12, 1–24.
L'Armand, K. L., & Pepitone, A. Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 134–139.
Luginbuhl, J., & Mullin, C. Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 547–559.
Matlin, M. W. The psychology of women. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1987.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987, 34, 186–196.
Russell, D. E. H. Sexual exploitations: Rape, child sexual abuse and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
Ryan, K. M. Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1988, 12, 237–245.
Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1983, 46, 220–232.
Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1987, 11, 353–358.
Thornton, B., & Ryckman, R. M. The influence of rape victim's physical attractiveness on observers' attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 1983, 36, 549–562.
Warshaw, R. I never called it rape. New York: Harper & Row, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the University of Connecticut Research Foundation Grant No. 1171-000-22-00215-35-760. The authors thank Laurin Hafner for his help with the data analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bridges, J.S., McGrail, C.A. Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles 21, 273–286 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289907
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289907