Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between sex-role identity and beliefs in personal control

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three hundred and ten college undergraduate students completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and Rotter's Internal-External Scale measuring locus of control. Males were significantly more internal than females. Both males and females who had high same-sex scale scores were significantly more internal than those with low same-sex scale scores. That is, males who were masculine or androgynous and females who were feminine or androgynous reported greater internal locus of control beliefs than did those males who were feminine or undifferentiated and those females who were masculine or undifferentiated. It was suggested that these findings result from different styles of power typically associated with sex-role stereotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E., & Cohen, L. Men and women: Personality patterns and contrasts. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1959, 59, 101–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, J. I. New perspectives on sex roles and personality dimensions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August 1975.

  • Berzins, J. I., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. The PRF ANDRO scale user's manual (revised). Unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky, 1976.

  • Block, J. H. Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. K., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. Sex differences in ego functioning: Exploratory studies of agency and communion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. Understanding women: Implications per research and theory. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. The behavior of women and men. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T. Relationships between sex, sex role, and social influence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1977, 2(1), 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R., Rebecca, M., & Oleshansky, B. Development of sex-role transcendence. Human Development, 1975, 18, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochreich, D. J. Sex-role stereotypes for internal-external control and interpersonal trust. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43(2), 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, V. C. Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, 619–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32(3), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65(4), 206–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnegerode, F. A. Attitudes toward women, sex-role stereotyping and locus of control. Psychological Reports, 1976, 38, 1301–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. Masculinity-femininity: Current and alternate paradigms. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Random House Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Random House, 1966.

  • Rebecca, M., Hefner, R., & Oleshansky, B. A model of sex-role transcendence. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80(1) (Whole No. 609).

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, S.J., Black, K.N. The relationship between sex-role identity and beliefs in personal control. Sex Roles 7, 425–431 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288070

Keywords

Navigation