Skip to main content
Log in

Hostility and sex guilt: Perceptions of self and others as a function of gender and sex-role orientation

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males and females indicated their perceptions of sex and hostility guilt for themselves and for typical males or typical females. Males were found to be less guilty than females. Both sexes perceived the typical female to be more guilty than the typical male, and both underestimated the actual level of female guilt. Subjects were also classified according to sex-role orientation. Masculine sex-typed people were less guilty than feminine sex-typed individuals, with androgynous groups falling between these two. Also, sex-consistent subjects and androgynous females perceived themselves as similar to others of their gender, while androgynous males perceived themselves as being similar to both males and females. Sex-reversed subjects evidenced conflict and inaccuracies in their perceptions of self versus others. Implications for future research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P. R., Mosher, D. L., Abramson, L. M., & Woychowski, B. Personality correlates of the Mosher Guilt Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977, 41, 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 1047–1054.

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdwins, C., Small, A., & Gross, R. The relationship of sex role to self-concept. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980, 36, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A., Deutsch, C. J., & Strahan, R. F. Feminine and masculine dimensions of the typical, desirable, and ideal woman and man. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 767–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. L., & Schwab, R. Personality characteristics of androgynous and sex-typed females. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1979, 43, 614–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. The development and multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of three measures of three aspects of guilt. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1966, 30, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, L., & Taylor, S. E. Sex, sex-role identification, and awareness of sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Shari Sparling for her assistance in collecting and scoring the data for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, R.G. Hostility and sex guilt: Perceptions of self and others as a function of gender and sex-role orientation. Sex Roles 10, 207–215 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287775

Keywords

Navigation