Skip to main content
Log in

Texture analysis — A new method of differentiating prostatic carcinoma from prostatic hypertrophy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study compares the results of a new computer assisted evaluation programm of sonographic images of the prostate with the histological examination of the operative specimen. This computer program is based on the fact that the human eye is not capable of distinguishing picture distribution points which differ in higher than second order statistics. The sensitivity of the method was 89%, the specificity 86% and the diagnostic accuracy 88%. The results are discussed by comparing them to results of transrectal sonography and digital palpation as reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes WR, Ninan CA (1972) Carcinoma of the prostate: biopsy and conservative therapy. J Urol 108:897–900

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breackman J, Denis L (1983) The practice and pitfalls of ultrasonography of the lower urinary tract. Eur Urol 9:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooman PJC, Peeling WB, Griffiths GJ, Roberts E, Evans K (1981) A comparison between digital examination and the perrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of the prostate. Br J Urol 53:617–620

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gammelgaard J, Holm HH (1980) Transurethral and transrectal ultrasonic scanning in urology. J Urol 124:863–868

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg M, Neimen HL, Vogelzang R, Falkowski W (1982) Ultrasonographic features of prostatic carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 10:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harada K, Tanahashi Y, Igari D, Numata I, Orikasa S (1980) Clinical evaluation of inside echo patients in gray scale prostatic echography. J Urol 124:216–220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kadow JC, Gingell JC, Penry JB (1985) Prostatic ultrasonography: a useful technique? Br J Urol 57:440–443

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peeling WB, Griffiths GJ (1984) Imaging of the prostate by ultrasound. J Urol 132:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  9. Resnick MI, Willard WJ, Boyce HW (1978) Ultrasonic evaluation of the prostatic nodule. J Urol 120:86–89

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schuster E, Knoflach P, Huber K, Grabner G (1986) An interactive processing system for ultrasonic compound imaging, real-time processing and texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 8: 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Watnabe H, Igari D, Tanehishi Y, Harada K, Saitoh M (1974) Development and application of new equipment for transrectal ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 2:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wawerda C (1984) Untersuchung von Gewebe mittels Textur-Algorithmen. Masters Thesis, Technical University Vienna

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kratzik, C., Schuster, E., Hainz, A. et al. Texture analysis — A new method of differentiating prostatic carcinoma from prostatic hypertrophy. Urol. Res. 16, 395–397 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256050

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256050

Key words

Navigation