Skip to main content
Log in

Relatedness measured by oligonucleotide probe DNA fingerprints and an estimate of the mating system of Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using DNA fingerprint markers within species and populations of wild plants requires information on the relationship between fingerprint similarity and relatedness. We identified a hypervariable marker based on oliog(GATA)4-hybridization of DpnII-cut genomic DNA from Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum). Banding patterns were somatically stable and highly variable among unrelated individuals. Band molecular-weight sizing errors (as a percent of band molecular weight) were estimated at 0.44%±0.003 within gels and 0.76%±0.964 between gels. Band sizing errors defined a 99% confidence bin of ±0.95% (1.90% total) of molecular weight. Band-sharing estimates were based on this bin size and on variance estimates that compensate for non-independent comparisons. Band-sharing among nine unrelated individuals (θ) was 0.198±0.O11. Experimental pollinations designed to produce selfed, fulland half-sib progeny groups led to five selfed progeny groups and no outcrossed progeny (mean band-sharing, ovS=0.468±0.074). A linear regression between band-sharing (S) and relatedness (r) assuming 17% inbreeding was r=0.006+0.914*S (R2=0.973) and established the maximum amount of inbreeding. ovS(0.392±0.022) estimated from wild pollinated seeds from four maternal families was intermediate to unrelated individuals and experimental selfed progeny, giving evidence for mixed mating in wild plants. More extensive plant pedigrees with known levels of inbreeding will be needed to measure variation in the relationship between S and r among populations and families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1993) Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1953) Dimorphism and monomorphism in the Plumbaginaceae. II. Pollen and stigmata in the genus Limonium. Ann Bot 67:433–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Budowle B, Giusti AM, Waye JS, Baechtel FS, Fourney RM, Adams DE, Presley LA, Deadman HA, Monson KL (1991) Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. Am J Hum Genet 48:841–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler MA, Templeton AR, Read B (1994) DNA fingerprinting in Speke's gazelle: a test for genetic distinctness, and the correlation between relatedness and similarity. Mol Ecol 3:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DA, Packer C, Pusey AC, Stephens JC, O'Brien SJ (1991) Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: parentage, genetic diversity, and relatedness. J Hered 82:378–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DA, Boag PT, Gibbs HL, White BD (1991) Sizing bands on autoradiograms: a study of precision for scoring DNA fingerprints. Electrophoresis 12:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig SM, Belthoff JR, Allen DH (1993) Examination of population structure in red-cockaded woodpeckers using DNA profiles. Evolution 47:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Heery DM, Gannon F, Powell R (1990) A simple method for subcloning DNA fragments from gel slices. Trends Genet 6:173

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung C, Pillen K, Frese L, Fähr S, Melchinger AE (1993) Phylogenetic relationships between cultivated and wild species of the genus Beta revealed by DNA “fingerprinting.” Theor Appl Genet 86:449–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnlein U, Zadworny D, Dawe Y, Fairfull RW, Gavora JS (1990) Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics 125:161–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Luteyn JL (1990) The Plumbaginaceae in the flora of the southeastern United States. Sida 14:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 5:584–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1991) Analysis of population genetic structure by DNA fingerprinting. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jefferies AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak Y-M, Ho K-K (1993) Use of polyethelene glycol for purification of DNA from leaf tissue of woody plants. BioTechniques 14: 735–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannen H, Tsuji S, Mukai F, Goto N, Ohtagaki S (1993) Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient. J Hered 84:166–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom H (1991) Applications of DNA fingerprinting in plant breeding. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jefferies AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 294–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom H, Hall HK (1991) Minisatellite DNA ‘fingerprints’ can distinguish Rubis cultivars and estimate their degree of relatedness. Euphytica 53:107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Gilbert DA, Pusey AE, O'Brien SJ (1991) A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature 351:562–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper WH, Rabenold PP (1992) Use of fragment-sharing estimates from DNA fingerprinting to determine relatedness in a tropical wren. Mol Ecol 1:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Rave EH, Fleischer RC, Duvall F, Black JM (1994) Genetic analyses throught DNA fingerprinting of captive populations of Hawaiian geese. Conservation Biol 8:744–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Riscn NJ, Devlin B (1992) On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints. Science 255:717–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heusden AW, Van der Voort JR, Bachmann K (1991) Oligo-(GATA) fingerprints identify clones in asexual dandelions Taraxacum (Asteraceae). Fingerprint News 3:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS (1992) Independence of VNTR alleles defined as fixed bins. Genetics 130:873–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Beyermann B, Ramser J, Kahl G (1991a) Plant DNA fingerprinting with radioactive and digoxigenated oligonucleotide probes complementary to simple repetitive DNA sequences. Electrophoresis 12: 159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, J Ramser, D Kaemmer, G Kahl,and JT Epplen (1991b) Oligonucleotide fingerprinting in plants and fungi. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jefferies AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 312–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Nybom H, Wolff K, Meyer W (1994a) DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Ramser J, Kaemmer D, Kahl G (1994b) Multilocus DNA fingerprinting and genetic relatedness in plants: a case study with banana and tomato. In: Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, De Salle R (eds) Molecular ecology and evolution: approaches and applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Noon WA, Reeve HK, Aquadro CF (1988) Improved hybridization conditions for DNA ‘fingerprints’ probed with M13. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff R, Nakamura Y, Odelberg S, Shiang R, White R (1991) Generation of variability at VNTR loci in human DNA. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jefferies AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 20–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by p. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, M.B., Rand, D.M. Relatedness measured by oligonucleotide probe DNA fingerprints and an estimate of the mating system of Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 249–256 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225753

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225753

Key words

Navigation