Abstract
Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cm and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from the tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbs JH, Cole KJ (1987) Neural mechanisms of motor equivalence and goal achievement. In: Wise SP (ed) Higher brain functions. Wiley, New York, pp 15–23
Anderson CW (1993) The modulation of feeding behavior in response to prey type in the frog Rana pipiens. J Exp Biol 179: 1–12
Anderson CW (1996) The neuroethology of prey capture in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. PhD thesis, Northern Arizona University
Anderson CW, Nishikawa KC (1993) A prey-type dependent hypoglossal feedback system in the frog Rana pipiens. Brain Behav Evol 42: 189–196
Anderson CW, Nishikawa KC (1995) The anatomy and functional significance of hypoglossal afferents in the frog. Soc Neurol Abstr 21: 278.5
Carter MC, Smith JL (1986) Simultaneous control of two rhythmical behaviors. I. Locomotion with the paw-shake response in normal cat. J Neurophysiol 56: 171–183
Comer C, Grobstein P (1981) Tactually elicited prey acquisition behavior in the frog, Rana pipiens, and a comparison with visually elicited behavior. J Comp Physiol 142: 141–150
Croll RP, Davis WJ (1987) Neural mechanisms of motor program switching in Pleurobranchaea. In: Wise SP (ed) Higher brain functions. Wiley, New York, pp 157–179
Ewert JP (1981) Neural coding of ‘worms’ and ‘antiworms’ in the brain of toads: the question of hardwired and softwired systems. In: Laming PR (ed) Brain mechanisms of behaviour in lower vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–168
Ewert JP (1985) Concepts in vertebrate neuroethology. Anim Behav 33: 1–29
Grobstein P (1991) Directed movement in the frog: a closer look at a central representation of spatial location. In: Arbib MA, Ewert JP (eds) Visual structures and integrated functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 125–137
Grobstein P (1992) Directed movement in the frog: motor choice, spatial representation, free will? In: Kien J, McCrohan CR, Winlow W (eds) Neurobiology of motor programme selection. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 250–279
Grobstem P, Comer C, Kostyk SK (1983) Frog prey capture behavior: between sensory maps and directed motor output. In: Ewert JP, Capranica R, Ingle D (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 331–347
Grobstein P, Reyes A, Zwanziger L, Kostyk SK (1985) Prey orienting in frogs: accounting for variations in output with stimulus distance. J Comp Phygiol A 156: 775–785
Honigmann H (1944) The visual perception of movement by toads. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 132: 291–307
Huang Z, Satterlie RA (1990) Neuronal mechanisms underlying behavioral switching in a pteropod mollusc. J Comp Physiol A 166: 875–887
Kaess W, Kaess F (1960) Perception of apparent motion in the common toad. Science 132: 953
Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1959) What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc Inst Radio Eng 47: 1940–1951
Mohl B (1989) ‘Biological noise’ and plasticity of sensorimotor pathways in the locust flight system. J Comp Physiol A 166: 75–82
Nishikawa KC, Gans C (1992) The role of hypoglossal sensory feedback during feeding in the marine toad, Bufo marinus. J Exp Zool 264: 245–252
Nishikawa KC, Innocenti CM (1994) Motor learning in toads (Bufo marinus) following hypoglossal transection. Am Zool 34: 5
Nishikawa KC, Anderson CW, Deban SM, O'Reilly JC (1992) The evolution of neural circuits controlling feeding behavior in frogs. Brain Behav Evol 40: 125–140
Nishikawa KC, O'Reilly JC, Sasongko BWP, Anderson CW (1993) Convergent evolution of hypoglossal afferents that influence jaw muscles in frogs. Soc Neurol Abstr 19: 68.12
Nishikawa KC, Anderson CW, O'Reilly JC (1995) Evolution of sensory pathways that modulate feeding behavior in frogs. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Neurons, Networks, and Motor Behavior VI-14P, University of Arizona, Tucson
Pearson KG (1993) Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 16: 265–297
Reingold SC, Camhi JM (1977) A quantitative analysis of rhythmic leg movements during three different behaviors in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Insect Physiol 23: 1407–1420
Satou M, Shiraishi A (1991) Local motion processing in the optic tectum of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus. J Comp Physiol A 169: 569–589
Shinn EA, Dole JW (1978) Evidence for a role for olfactory cues in the feeding response of leopard frogs, Rana pipiens. Herpetologica 34: 167–172
Stein PSG (1989) Spinal cord circuits for motor pattern selection in the turtle. Ann NYAcad Sci 563: 1–10
Valdez CM, Nishikawa KC (1996) Sensory modulation and motor program choice during feeding in the Australian frog, Cyclorana novaehollandiae. Submitted to J Comp Physiol A
Weerasuriya A (1989) In search of the motor pattern generator for snapping in toads. In: Ewert JP, Arbib MA (eds) Visuomotor coordination; amphibians, comparisons, models, and robots. Plenum Press, New York, pp 589–614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, C.W., Nishikawa, K.C. The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs. J Comp Physiol A 179, 753–762 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207354
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207354