Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Controversy over whether intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) should be done routinely has intensified since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). As yet, no study has demonstrated a clear benefit to its use, although their have been suggestions in the literature that routine use may confer an advantage to detection of injuries. One-hundred seventy-seven biliary tract complications occurring secondary to LC were identified from the combined data of seven institutions. The goal of this retrospective study was to examine the impact of IOC on the occurrence, recognition, and correction of such complications. The complications identified include 39 cystic duct leaks, 69 major ductal leaks or strictures, and 69 major ductal transection or excision injuries. Whether IOC was performed was known in 157 (88%) patients with 53 patients definitely having and 104 not having an IOC. Data concerning IOC were unavailable in 20 cases. More injuries were detected intraoperatively in the group having IOC (P<0.001). Conversion of the LC to a laparotomy, often for repair of the injury, occurred more commonly in the group having a correctly interpreted IOC (P<0.001). Conversion resulted in detection of injuries sooner, resulting in fewer operative procedures to correct the injury (P<0.001). A transecting injury was prevented in at least seven patients when no visualization of the proximal biliary tree was documented by IOC. These partial ductal incisions were treated by t-tube placement. Incorrect interpretation of the IOC occurred in at least eight patients, with no identification of the proximal biliary tree in six. These data suggest routine IOC may offer significant potential advantages in the detection and subsequent correction of these injuries, as well as preventing extension of partial ductal incisions to complete ductal transections. Surgeons must be able to correctly interpret the IOC. Although routine IOC is suggested, careful dissection principles continue to be most important in the prevention of major extrahepatic bile duct injuries during LC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andren-Sandberg Å, Johansson S, Bengmark S (1985) Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy II. Results of treatment. Ann Surg 201: 452–455

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruhn EW, Miller FJ, Hunter JG (1991) Routine fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an argument. Surg Endosc 5: 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cantwell DV (1992) Routine cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 127: 483–484

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cantwell DV (1992) Routine cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 127: 483–484

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson MA, Ludwig KA, Frantizides CT, Cattey RP, Henry LG, Walker AP, Schulte WJ, Wilson SD (1993) Routine or selective intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendo Surg 3: 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cates JA, Tompkins RK, Zinner MJ, Busuttil RW, Kallman C, Roslyn JJ (1993) Biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 59: 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clair DG, Carr-Locke DL, Becker JM, Brooks DC (1993) Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 128: 551–554

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Nathanson LK, Pietrabissa A (1994) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 302–305

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Wahlstrom HE, Sarr MG, Weaver AL, Ilstrup DM (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early Mayo Clinic Experience. Mayo Clin Proc 67: 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graves EJ (1989) Detailed diagnosis and procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1987 National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1989; 13: 100, 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162: 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ko ST, Airan MC (1991) Review of 300 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystecotmies: development, evolution, and results. Surg Endosc 5: 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kozarek RA, Traverso LW (1991) Endoscopic stent placement for cystic duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37: 71–73

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Talamini MA, Wang BH, Pitt HA, Gadacz TR (1992) Selective cholangiography: the current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 669–674

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merestein D, MacGowan KM, Kune GA (1985) Frequency of anatomical hazards during cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 2: 121–125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Metcalf AM, Ephgrave KS, Dean TR, Maher JW (1992) Preoperative screening with ultrasonography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg 112: 813–817

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mirizzi PL (1932) La cholangiographic duranted las operaciones de las vias biliares. Bol Soc Circ 16: 1133–1161

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rantis PC, Greenlee HB, Pickleman J, Printz RA (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: more than meets the eye. Am Surg 59: 533–540

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sim RR, Nowicky DJ, McAlhany JC Jr, Blouin GS, Blackhurst DW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a community hospital setting. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175: 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  21. Traverso LW, Hauptmann EM, Lynge DC (1994) Routine intraoperative cholangiography and its contribution to the selective cholangiographer. Am J Surg 167: 464–468

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voyles CR, Sanders DL, Hogan R (1994) Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 219: 744–752

    Google Scholar 

  23. Way LW, Bernhoft RA, Thomas MJ (1981) Biliary stricture. Surg Clin North Am 61: 963–972

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Tsao J, Rossi RL, Gough D, Donohue JH (1994) Characteristics of biliary tract complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional study. Am J Surg 167: 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woods MS, Shellito JL, Santoscoy GS, Hagan RC, Kilgore WR, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Brandabuv JJ (1994) Cystic duct leaks occur more commonly with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 168: 560–563

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The Wichita Clinic, 3311 East Murdock, 67208-0068, Wichita, KS, USA

    M. S. Woods

  2. Section of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Virginia Mason Clinic, P.O. Box 900, C6-N, 98111, Seattle, WA, USA

    L. W. Traverso

  3. Section of Gastroenterology, The Virginia Mason Clinic, P.O. Box 900, C3-N, 98111, Seattle, WA, USA

    R. A. Kozarek

  4. Division of General and Gastroenterologic Surgery, The Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, 55905, Rochester, MN, USA

    J. H. Donohue

  5. University Department of Surgery, Freemantle Hospital, GPO Box 480, 6160, Western Australia, Australia

    D. R. Fletcher

  6. Department of Surgery, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA

    J. G. Hunter & M. Oddsdottir

  7. Department of Surgery, The Lahey Clinic, 41 Mall Road, 01805, Burlington, MA, USA

    R. L. Rossi & J. Tsao

  8. University Department of Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland 3, New Zealand

    J. Windsor

Authors
  1. M. S. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. W. Traverso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. A. Kozarek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. H. Donohue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. R. Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. G. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Oddsdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. L. Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Tsao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. Windsor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woods, M.S., Traverso, L.W., Kozarek, R.A. et al. Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 9, 1076–1080 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188990

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188990

Key words

Search

Navigation