Conclusion
Many factors influence the value of a tear substitute. Not only its therapeutic value, but also the preservative used and the manageability of the container play a very important role.
The preference of the patients was for Liquifilm tears and Duratears eyedrops, for the night Vidisic was the most satisfactory preparation. The preservative benzalkonium chloride should be avoided as far as possible because of its cytotoxic action. The clinical picture of hurricane keratitis indicates that too much of this preservative has been applied to the eye.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brewitt H, Joost P. Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Wirksamkeit von Tränenersatzflüssigkeiten. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1987; 84: 150–154.
Dolder R, Skinner Fs. Ophthalmologilia, Pharmaliologie Biopharmarie und Galenich der Augen aruzeimittels. Stuttgart: Wissenschafthiche Veilagsgesellschaft MBH, 1983.
Farmacotherapeutisch Compas. Amstelveen, Zienkenfondsraad, 1986.
Gasset AR, Ishii Y, Kaufman HE. Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic preservatives. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 98–105.
Leibowitz HM, Chang RK, Mandell AI. Gel tears. A new medication for the treatment of dry eyes. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1199–1204.
Polack FM. Hurricane keratitis. Cornea 1985; 4: 137–140.
Polack FM, McNiece MT. The treatment of dry eyes with Na hyaluronate (Healon). Cornea 1982; 1: 133–136.
Tseng SCG, Maumenee AE, Stark WJ, Maumenee IH, Jensen AD, Green WR, Kenyon KR. Topical retinoid treatment for various dry-eye disorders. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 717–727.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Völker-Dieben, H.J., Kok-Van Alphen, C.C., Hollander, J. et al. The palliative treatment of the dry eye. Doc Ophthalmol 67, 221–227 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142715
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142715