Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers as adult learners: their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a description of the structural organization, conceptions and knowledge of their own learning possessed by 40 teachers ranging in age from 23 to 53 years, studying as adult learners in an inservice course concerned with adult learning. It is based on their written statements about learning at the beginning of a one semester subject. The statements were categorised by structural organization according to a modification of the SOLO Taxonomy for tertiary students' knowledge of learning and the content at each level of the Taxonomy was analysed. Eighty percent of the students gave responses at the multistructural level. The content of responses fell into four categories; beliefs about learning; factors influencing learning; learning processes; and learning outcomes. The content of responses varied between SOLO levels. Very little mention was made in any of the responses of factors considered to be typical of adult learning. The results suggest that even teachers such as these need to learn more about learning in order to become independent self-directed learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biggs, J.B. (ed.) (1991). Teaching for Learning: the View from Cognitive Psychology. Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1992). ‘A qualitative approach to grading students’, HERDSA News 14 (3), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1992). ‘Modes of learning, forms of knowing, and ways of schooling’, in Demetriou, A., Shayer, M. and Efklides, A. (eds.), Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development. London: Routledge, pp. 31–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1993). ‘What do inventories of students learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1989). ‘Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment: using the SOLO Taxonomy’, Australian Journal of Education33, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G.M. (1992). ‘The SOLO taxonomy and levels of knowledge of learning’, Research and Development in Higher Education15, 482–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G.M. (1994) ‘Tertiary students' knowledge of their own learning and a SOLO Taxonomy’, Higher Education28, 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G.M. and Dart, B.C. (1994). ‘Assessing students? knowledge of learning: a comparison of data collection methods’, in Gibbs, G. (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice. OCSD: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S.D. (1991). Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. (1994). ‘Teaching for improved learning in small classes in higher education’. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, November 1994, University of Newcastle, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, A. and Entwistle, N. (1992). ‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’, Learning and Instruction2, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. and Entwistle, A. (1991). ‘Developing, revising, and examining conceptual understanding in degree courses: the student experience and its implications’. Research Report, Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, K.G. (1990). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976). ‘On qualitative differences in learning. I - outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1984). ‘Approaches to learning’, in Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N.J. (eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. and Beaty, E. (1993). ‘Conceptions of learning’, International Journal of Educational Research 19(3), 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T. and Richards, L. (1991). ‘Data base organisation for qualitative analysis: the NUDIST system’. Technical Report No. 18/91. Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saljo, R. (1979). ‘Learning about learning’, Higher Education8, 443–451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Wilss, L. & Mutch, S. Teachers as adult learners: their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. High Educ 32, 89–106 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139220

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139220

Keywords

Navigation