Abstract
Recent federal proposals and program experiments aimed at improving the innovative performance of American industry have been based on an inappropriate analytic framework. The neoclassical microeconomic analysis upon which these proposals are based emphasizes the undersupply of R & D. However, a more crucial problem in this context is the utilization of complex research results by firms and industries with low levels of in-house research expertise. This problem is a central concern of an alternative approach to the analysis of innovation, termed the information processing framework. This analytic approach, which receives empirical support from an examination of previous cooperative research programs in the United States and Great Britain and an analysis of independent consulting firms' operations, suggests that cooperative or extramural research does not function effectively as a substitute for in-house research. Public policies to encourage innovation should be attentive to the distribution, as well as the supply, of R & D.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T.J.(1978). Managing the Flow of Technology (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press).
Armour, H. O. and Teece, D. J.(1981). “Vertical integration and technological innovation,” Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 470–474.
Armour, H. O. and Teece, D. J. (1978). “Organizational structure and economic performance: A test of the M-form hypothesis,” Bell Journal of Economics 9: 106–122.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention,” in Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Arrow, K. J. (1969). “Classificatory notes on the production and transmission of technical knowledge,”American Economic Review 59: 29–35.
Baer, W., Johnson, L. L. and Merrow, E. W. (1977). “Government-sponsored demonstrations of new technologies,” Science 196: 950–957.
Brodsky, N. H., Kaufman, H. and Tooker, J. (1980). University/ Industry Cooperation (New York: Center for Science and Technology Policy).
Caves, R. E. and Uekusa, M. (1976). Industrial Organization in Japan (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).
Coase, R. H. (1937). “The nature of the firm,” Economica, 2d series, 4: 386–405.
Cohen, W. M. (1983). “Investment and industry expansion: A corporate variables framework,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.
Constant, E. W. (1980). Origins of the Turbojet Revolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980). “Market structure and the nature of inventive activity,” Bell Journal of Economics 11: 1–28.
Eads, G. and Nelson, R. R. (1971). “Government support of advanced civilian technology: Power reactors and the supersonic transport,” Public Policy 19: 405–428.
Flaherty, M. T. (1981). “Prices versus quantities and financial vertical integration,” Bell Journal of Economics 12: 507–525.
Fox, J. R. (1974). Arming America (Boston: Harvard Business School).
Grad, M. (1977). “Evaluation status and planning II, cooperative research and development experiment,” Report 77-03, Industrial Program, Applied Science and Research Applications Directorate, National Science Foundation.
Horwitch, M. (1982). Clipped Wings: The American SST Conflict (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Johnson, P. S. (1973). Co-operative Research in Industry (New York: Halsted/Wiley).
Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lane, H. W., Beddows, R. G. and Lawrence, P. R. (1981). Managing Large Research and Development Programs (Albany: State University of New York Press).
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. (1967). “Differentiation and integration in complex organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1–47.
Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Romeo, A., Villani, E., Wagner, S. and Husic, F. (1977). The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology (New York: W. W. Norton).
Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. and Summers, R. (1967). Strategy for R& D (New York: Springer Verlag).
Marshall, A. W. and Meckling, W. H. (1962). “Predictability of the costs, time, and success of development,”in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity.
Mowery, D. C. (1983). “The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940,” Explorations in Economic History, forthcoming.
Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. (1982). “Government policy and innovation in the commercial aircraft industry, 1925–75,” in R. R. Nelson (ed.), Government and Technical Change: A Cross-Industry Analysis (New York: Pergamon Press).
National Science Foundation (1979). An Analysis of the National Science Foundation's University-Industry Cooperative Research Centers Experiment (Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation).
Nelson, R. R. (1959). “The simple economics of basic scientific research,” Journal of Political Economy 67: 297–306.
Nelson, R. R. (1961) “Uncertainty, learning and the economics of parallel research and development efforts,” Review of Economics and Statistics 43: 351–364.
Nelson, R. R. (1981). “Assessing private enterprise: An exegesis of tangled doctrine,” Bell Journal of Economics 12: 93–111.
Nelson, R. R. (1982). “Government stimulus of technological progress: Lessons from American history,” in Government and Technical Change: A Cross-Industry Analysis.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1968). Industrial Research Organizations in the United Kingdom (Paris: OECD).
President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island (1979). The Role of the Managing Utility and Its Suppliers (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).
Quigley, J. M. (1982). “Residential construction and public policy,” in Government and Technical Change: A Cross-Industry Analysis.
Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).
Rogers, E. M. (1982) “Information exchange and technological innovation,” in D. Sahal (ed.), The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge (Lexington: D.C. Heath).
Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press).
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2d ed. (Chicago: Rand McNally).
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man (New York: Wiley).
Stigler, G. J.(1956). “Industrial organization and economic progress,” in L. D. White (ed.), The State of the Social Sciences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Teece, D. J. (1976). The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer (Cambridge: Ballinger).
Teece, D. J. (1980). “Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 223–247.
Teece, D. J. (1982). “Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 39–63.
Teece, D. J. (1981). “Internal organization and economic performance: An empirical analysis of the profitability of principal firms,” Journal of Industrial Economics 30: 173–200.
Teubal, M. M. and Steinmueller, W. E. (1982). “Government policy, innovation, and economic growth: Lessons from a study of satellite communications,” Research Policy 11: 271–287.
U.S. Council of Economic Advisers (1963). Economic Report of the President, 1962 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).
U.S. Senate, Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space (1979). Hearings on the National Technology Innovation Act (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies (New York: Free Press).
Williamson, O. E. (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–262.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). “The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes,” Journal of Economic Literature 19: 1537–1570.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mowery, D.C. Economic theory and government technology policy. Policy Sci 16, 27–43 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138466
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138466