Skip to main content
Log in

Mitotic spatial model: Arrangement of homologous chromosomes

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different mitotic spatial models (Lavania & Sharma, Biosystems 14: 171–178, 1981: Ashley & Pocock, Genetica 55: 161–169, 1981) for the arrangement of the chromosomes in the nucleus are analysed for the sake of comparison and assessment. In general, the two models propose nearly the same orientation regarding chromosomal organization. However, they differ with respect to the position of homologous chromosomes, suggesting respectively their adjacent or opposite location in somatic arrangement. The two proposals have been analysed in the light of experimental evidence as well as organizational interpretations. The arguments presented here support the adjacent location of somatic homologous chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley, T. & Pocock, N., 1981. A proposed model of chromosomal organization in nuclei at fertilization. Genetica 55: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, T. & Wagenaar, E. B., 1974. Telomeric associations of gametic and somatic chromosomes in diploid and autotetraploid Ornithogalum virens. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 16: 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi, L. & Feldman, M., 1980. Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Hum. Genet. 55: 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avivi, L., Feldman, M. & Brown, M., 1982. An ordered arrangement of chromosomes in the somatic nucleus of common wheat. Triticum aestivum I., I. Spatial relationships between chromosomes of the same genome. Chromosoma 86: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., D., 1981. The spatial order of barley chromosomes. In: Barley Genetics IV: 751–757. Proc.4th int. Barley Genet. Symp. Edinburgh, 1981.

  • Bennett, M. D., 1982. Nucleotypie basis of the spatial ordering of chromosomes in Eukaryotes and the implications of the order for genome evolution and phenotypic variation. In: Genome evolution (eds G. A. Dover & R. B. Flavell): 239–261. Academic Press.

  • Brown, W. V. & Stack, S. M., 1968. Somatic pairing as a regular preliminary to meiosis. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 95: 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, K. P. S. & Abel, W. O., 1968. Evidence for the association of homologous chromosomes during premeiotic stages in Impatiens and Salvia. Chromosoma 25: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, M. D., Cuadras, C. M. & Egozcue, J., 1980. Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphase plate-symmetrical arrangement in human male cells. Genet. Res. 36: 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D. E., 1980. Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum. Genet. 53: 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPraw, E. J., 1970. DNA and chromosomes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedak, G. & Helgason, S. B., 1970. Somatic association of chromosomes in barley. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., Mello-Sampayo, T. & Avivi, I., 1972. Somatic association of homoeologous chromosomes in Tritieum aestivum. Chromosoma 37: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, E. & Lacadena, J. R., 1977. Homologous somatic association in radial metaphases of Crepis species. Chromosoma 64: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, D. E. & Stack, S. M., 1976. Homologous and non-homologous chromosome associations by interchromosomal chromatin connectives in Ornithogalum virens. Chromosoma 57: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneen, W. K. & Nichols, W. W., 1972. Nonrandom arrangement of metaphase chromosomes in cultured cells of the Indian deer Muntiacus muntiac. Cytogenet. 11: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, O., 1965. Struktur-Differenzierungen in Y-Chromosom von Drosophila hydei und ihre Beziehungen zu Gen-Aktivitäten. III. Sequenz und Lokalisation der Schleifenbildungsorte. Chromosoma 16: 222–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. D. & Walden, D. B., 1978. Affinity distance values among somatic metaphase chromosomes in maize. Genetics 88: 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., Brinkley, B. R. & Arrighl, F. E., 1967. The structure and behaviour of nucleolus organizers in mammalian cells. Chromosoma 23: 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janaki-Ammal, F. K., 1932. Chromosome studies in Nieandra physaloides. La Cellule 41: 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juricek, D. K., 1975. Nonrandom chromosome distribution in radial metaphases from the Chinese hamster. I. Uneultured cells. Chromosoma 50: 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitani, Y., 1963. Orientation, arrangement and association of somatic chromosomes. Jap. J. Genet. 38: 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir, U., 1977. Behaviour of alien chromosomal material in wheat genome. Ph.D. thesis, Weizman Institute of Science, Rehovot.

  • Lavania, U. C. & Sharma, A. K., 1981. An interphase model for mitotic chromosome organization in Eukaryota. Biosystems 14: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. P., 1967. Evidenec for homologous pairing of chromosomes prior to meiotic prophase in maize. Chromosoma 21: 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello-Sampayo, T., 1973. Somatic association of telocentric chromosomes carrying homologous centromeres in common wheat. Theor. appl. Genet. 43: 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosolov, A. N. & Bondareva, A. A., 1976. Achromatic pole, centromeric ring and nucleolus: Spatial interrelation in mitotic and interphase nucleus. Nucleus 19: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, J. B., 1922. The organization of the nuclei in the root tips of Podophyllum peltatum. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 20: 275–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivaiah, R. S., Watkins, R. & Rajathy, T., 1969. Somatic association of chromosomes in diploid and hexaploid Avena. Chromosoma 28: 468–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. J., Robbelen, G. & Okamoto, M., 1976. Somatic association at interphase studied by Giemsa banding technique. Chromosoma 56: 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. M. & Brown, W. V., 1969. Somatic and premeiotic pairing of homologues in Plantago ovata. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 96: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. M. & Clark, C. R., 1974. Chromosome polarization and nuclear rotation in Allium cepa roots. Cytologia 39: 553–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, C. P., 1957. Cytology and cytogenetics (Prentice Hall, Inc.).

  • Tanaka, N., 1981. Studies on chromosome arrangement in some higher plants III. Haplopappus gracilis (2n=4) and Crepis capillaris (2n=6). Cytologia 46: 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., 1973. Somatic association of chromosomes in asynaptic genotypes of Avena sativa L. Chromosoma 42: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, E. B., 1969. End-to-end chromosome attachments in mitotic interphase and their possible significance to meiotic chromosome pairing. Chromosoma 26: 410–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, H. Y., Yamaguchi, M. & Takano, Y., 1974. Somatic association of homologous chromosomes in rye. Jap. J. Genet. 49: 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavania, U.C., Sharma, A.K. Mitotic spatial model: Arrangement of homologous chromosomes. Genetica 62, 203–208 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056437

Keywords

Navigation