Skip to main content
Log in

Smoking cessation and nonsmoking intervals: effect of different smoking patterns on lung cancer risk

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A case-control study of lung cancer was conducted in northwestern Germany in 1985–86. The study included 194 lung cancer cases and the same number of hospital controls and population controls who were matched to the cases by sex and age. Personal interviews were conducted by trained interviewers. We report here the effect of different smoking patterns—such as nonsmoking intervals, and time since quitting smoking—on lung cancer risk. Both quitting smoking and having a nonsmoking interval are seen to reduce lung cancer risk significantly. For a nonsmoking interval of three years or more, relative risk (RR)=0.21, 95 percent confidence interval (CI)=0.08–0.52; for quitting smoking for 10 years or more, RR=0.23, CI=0.11–0.48). A dose-response relationship was estimated for cigarette dose, length of nonsmoking interval, and time since stopped smoking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doll R, Peto R. Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years' observations on male British doctors.Br Med J 1976;ii: 1525–36.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer.Tobacco Smoking. Lyon, France: IARC, 1986;IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Humans, Vol. No. 38: 270.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lubin JH, Blot WJ, Berrino F, et al. Modifying risk of developing lung cancer by changing habits of cigarette smoking.Br Med J 1984;288: 1953–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lubin JH, Blot WJ, Berrino F, et al. Patterns of lung cancer risk according to type of cigarette smoked.Int J Cancer 1984;33: 569–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zatonski W, Becher H, Lissowska J, Smoking cessation: intermediate nonsmoking periods and reduction of laryngeal cancer risk.JNCI 1990;82: 1427–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zatonski W, Becher H, Lissowska J, Wahrendorf J. Tobacco, alcohol, and diet in etiology of laryngeal cancer: a population-based case-control study.Cancer Causes Control 1991;2: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartge P, Silverman D, Hoover R, et al. Changing cigarette habits and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study.JNCI 1987;78: 1119–25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jöckel KH, Ahrens W, Wichmann HE,et al. Results from a German lung cancer study on occupational and environmental hazards.Int J Epidemiol (In press).

  9. Breslow N, Day NE.Statistical Methods in Cancer Research Vol I: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becher H, Jöckel KH. Bias adjustment with polychotomous logistic regression in matched case-control studies with two control groups.Biom J. 1990;32: 801–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Day NE, Brown CC. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer.JNCI 1980;64: 977–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Dr Becher is with the German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. Dr Jöckel is with the Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Bremen, Germany. Drs Timm and Drescher are with the University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. Dr Wichmann is with the University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany. Address correspondence to Dr Becher, German Cancer Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology and Biometry, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany. The study was supported by the Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becher, H., Jöckel, KH., Timm, J. et al. Smoking cessation and nonsmoking intervals: effect of different smoking patterns on lung cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 2, 381–387 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054298

Key words

Navigation