Summary
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in the southern Great Plains of the U.S.A. are exposed to a wide range of moisture conditions due to large fluctuations in the amount and frequency of rainfall. Yield stability under those conditions is therefore a desirable trait for wheat breeders. Our primary objective was to quantify various genetic parameters for grain production in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. We also attempted to predict and measure yield responses when selection is practiced in either drought-stressed or irrigated environments, or both. Seventy F2-derived lines from the cross, TAM W-101/Sturdy, were evaluated at Goodwell, OK, under irrigated and naturally drought-stressed conditions in 1987 and 1988. Genetic variance and heritability estimates were higher in the irrigated environment than in the drought-stressed environment. The genetic correlation coefficient for yields in the two environments was 0.20±0.16, indicating that selection of widely adapted genotypes requires testing in both environments. Based on the genetic variance/covariance structure of this particular population, the linear index which maximized the combined expected gain in both environments was 0.66Y1 + 0.34Y2, in which Y1 and Y2 are yields in the irrigated and drought-stressed environments. This index is not expected to apply across all populations; rather, it further supports the hypothesis that testing in either environment alone (drought stressed or irrigated) may not be most effective for increasing either mean productivity or yield under drought stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arboleda-Rivera, F. & W.A. Compton, 1974. Differential response of maize (Zea mays L.) to mass selection in diverse selection environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 44: 77–81.
Allen, F.L., R.E. Comstock & D.C. Rasmusson, 1978. Optimal environments for yield testing. Crop Sci. 18: 747–751.
Atlin, G.N. & K.J. Frey, 1989. Predicting the relative effectiveness of direct versus indirect selection for oat yield in three types of stress environments. Euphytica 44: 137–142.
Blum, A., 1985. Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
Bruckner, P.L. & R.C. Frohberg, 1987. Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 31–36.
Ceccarelli, S., 1987. Yield potential and drought tolerance of segregating populations of barley in contrasting environments. Euphytica 36: 265–273.
Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide: Euphytica 40: 197–205.
Ceccarelli, S., M.M. Nachit, G.O. Ferrara, M.S. Mekni, M. Tahir, J. van Leur & J.P. Srivastava, 1987. Breeding strategies for improving cereal yield and stability under drought. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Parceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 101–114. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Cox, T.S., J.P. Murphy & D.M. Rodgers, 1985. Coefficients of parentage for 400 winter wheat cultivars, pp. 24–93. Kansas State Univ. Agron. Dep. Rep., Manhattan, KS.
Duley, F.L. & J.J. Coyle, 1955. Farming where rainfall is 200–500mm a year. In: The Yearbook of Agriculture, pp. 407–415. U.S. Dep. of Agric., U.S. Govt. Printing Press, Washington D.C.
Ehdaie, B., J.G. Waines & A.E. Hall, 1988. Differential responses of landrace and improved spring wheat genotypes to stress environments. Crop Sci. 28: 838–842.
Eisen, E.J. & A.M. Saxton, 1983. Genotype by environment interactions and genetic correlations involving two environmental factors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 75–86.
Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd ed, p. 317. Longman Inc., New York.
Fischer, R.A. & R. Maurer, 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29: 897–912.
Frey, K.J., 1964. Adaptation reaction of oat strains selected under stress and non-stress environmental conditions. Crop Sci. 4: 55–58.
Hanson, W.D., 1989. Standard errors for heritability and expected selection response. Crop Sci. 29: 1561–1562.
Johnson, G.R. & K.J. Frey, 1967. Heritabilities of quantitative attributes of oats at varying levels of environmental stress. Crop Sci. 7: 43–46.
Johnson, S.S. & J.L. Geadelmann, 1989. Influence of water stress on grain yield response to recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 29: 558–564.
Laing, D.R. & R.A. Fischer, 1979. Adaptation of semidwarf wheat cultivars to rainfed conditions. Euphytica 26: 129–139.
Lin, C.Y., 1978. Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52: 49–56.
Quisenberry, J.E., B. Roark, D.W. Fryrear & R.J. Kohel, 1980. Effectiveness of selection in upland cotton in stress environments. Crop Sci. 20: 450–453.
Rosielle, A.A. & J. Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 943–946.
Roy, N.N. & B.R. Murty, 1970. A selection procedure in wheat for stress environments. Euphytica 19: 509–521.
Tahara, M., B.F. Carver, R.J. Johnson & E.L. Smith, 1990. Relationship between relative water content during reproductive development and winter wheat grain yield. Euphytica 49: 255–262.
Whitehead, W.F. & F.L. Allen, 1990. High-vs. low-stress yield test environments for selecting superior soybean lines. Crop Sci. 30: 912–918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ud-Din, N., Carver, B.F. & Clutter, A.C. Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. Euphytica 62, 89–96 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037933
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037933