Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) applied through the roots of maize seedlings on vegetative and early reproductive development of the shoots

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maize plants, grown in aerated solution cultures, were exposed, at different growth stages, to ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) applied through the roots for up to 9 d. Total uptake of ACC increased with seedling size. During ACC treatment, ethylene evolution, by the shoots, proceeded at an almost constant rate per unit fresh weight that was up to 40-fold faster than that of untreated plants. This stimulation extended several days beyond the period of ACC uptake. The effects on growth and development were assessed when plants were 50–52-d old. ACC application shortened certain stem internodes, leaf-sheaths and laminae. The location of these effects depended on the time of application. The greatest shortening was induced by application, at the 4-leaf stage (10 d-old), prior to elongation of the cone of the shoot apex. This is ascribed to effects on meristematic tissue, in addition to those on elongating cells. An unexpected response to ACC treatment, at the 4-leaf stage, was an increase of up to four leaf-bearing stem nodes compared to untreated plants. This resulted in a parallel elevation of the uppermost ear-bearing axillary shoot to higher nodal positions. The length of leaves high in the canopy (nodes 11–16) was promoted by treating seedlings with ACC. The only clear effect of the ACC treatments on emergent axillary shoots per se was a retardation of silk elongation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan Jones C (1985) C4 Grasses and Cereals. Growth, Development and Stress Response. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amrhein N, Forreiter C, Kionka C, Skorupka H and Tophof S (1987) Metabolism and compartmentation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in plant cells. In: K Schreiber, HR Schütte and G Sembdner eds. Conjugated Plant Hormones, Structure, Metabolism and Function, 102–108. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barber DA and Lee RB (1974) The effect of micro-organisms on the absorption of manganese by plants. New Phytol 73: 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergner Ch, Stock M, Giese M, Schütte HR and Sembdner G (1987) Long term fate of 1-(malonylamino)[2,3-14C]-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (14C-MACC) in pea and tomato plants. In: K Schreiber, HR Schütte and G Sembdner eds. Conjugated Plant Hormones, Structure, Metabolism and Function, 118–122. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonhomme R, Derieux M, Kiniry JR, Edmeades GO and Ozier-Lafontaine H (1991) Maize leaf number sensitivity in relation to photoperiod in multi-location field trials. Agron J 83: 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnett OT (1940) Development of the staminate and pistillate inflorescences of sweet corn. J Agric Res 60: 25–37

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bouzayen M, Latché A, Alibert G and Pech J-C (1988) Intracellular sites of synthesis and storage of 1-(malonylamino)cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and Acer pseodoplatanus cells. Plant Physiol 88: 613–617

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradford KJ and Yang SF (1980) Xylem transport of 1-aminocyclopropabe-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor, in waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiol 65: 322–326

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng PC, Greyson RI and Walden DB (1983) Organ initiation and the development of unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays. Am J Bot 70: 450–462

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coupland D and Jackson MB (1991) Effects of mecoprop (an auxin analogue) on ethylene evolution and epinasty in two biotypes of Stellaria media. Ann Bot 68: 167–172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cockshull KE and Horridge JS (1978) 2-Chloroethylphosphonic acid and flower initiation by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. in short days and in long days. J Hort Sci 53: 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox WJ and Andrade HF (1988) Growth, yield and yield components of maize as influenced by ethephon. Crop Sci 28: 536–542

    Google Scholar 

  13. Damptey HB and Aspinal D (1976) Water deficit and inflorescence development in Zea mays L Ann Bot 40: 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunlap JR (1988) Regulation of ACC-dependent ethylene production by excised leaves from normal and albino Zea mays L. seedlings. J Exp Bot 39: 1079–1089

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earley EB and Slife FW (1969) Effect of ethrel on growth and yield of corn. Agron J 61: 821–823

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finlayson SA, Foster KR and Reid DM (1991) Transport and metabolism of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in sun-flower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol 96: 1360–1367

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fritz VA, Hebel JB and Borowski AM (1991) Sweetcorn genotypes versus ethephon in relation to yield components. Agron J 83: 991–995

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irish EE and Nelson TM (1991) Identification of multiple stages in the conversion of maize meristems from vegetative to floral development. Development 112: 891–898

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson MB (1990) Hormonal and developmental changes in plants subjected to submergence or waterlogging. Aquatic Bot 38: 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson MB (1991) Ethylene in root growth and development. In: AK Mattoo and JC Suttle eds. The Plant Hormone Ethylene, 159–181. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson MB, Drew MC and Giffard SC (1981) Effects of applying ethylene to the root system of Zea mays on growth and nutrient concentration in relation to flooding tolerance. Physiol Plant 52: 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kiesselbach TA (1949) The Structure and Reproduction of Corn. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 161

  23. Konsler JV and Grabau LJ (1989) Ethephon as a morphological regulator for corn. Agron J 81: 849–852

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lürssen K and Konze J (1984) Relationship between ethylene production and plant growth after application of ethylene releasing plant growth regulators. In: JA Roberts and GA Tucker eds. Ethylene and Plant Development, 363–372. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Norberg OS, Mason SC and Lowry SR (1988) Ethephon influence on harvestable yield, grain quality and lodging of corn. Agron J 80: 768–772

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sass JE and Loeffel FA (1959) Development of axillary buds in maize in relation to barrenness. Agron J 51: 484–486

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Andel OM and Verkerke DR (1978) Stimulation and inhibition of ethephon of stem and leaf growth of some Gramineae at different stages of development. J Exp Bot 29: 639–651

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ververidis P and John P (1991) Complete recovery in vitro of ethylene-forming enzyme activity. Phytochem 30: 725–727

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whalen MC (1988) The effect of mechanical impedance on ethylene production by maize roots. Can J Bot 66: 2139–2142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinthus, M.J., Jackson, M.B. Effects of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) applied through the roots of maize seedlings on vegetative and early reproductive development of the shoots. Plant Growth Regul 14, 193–202 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024793

Key words

Navigation