Skip to main content

Climate-Resilient Livestock Farming to Ensure Food and Nutritional Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Resilient Food Systems

Abstract

Like agriculture, livestock is affected by global phenomena of climate change. It also, in turn, contributes to climate change. The global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions contributed by the livestock sector are major challenges. The sources of GHGs such as feed production, enteric fermentation, and manure management are further influenced by several other factors. The adverse effects of climate change can be effectively mitigated through livestock management, breeding program, animal nutrition and health management, developing farmers’ capabilities, manure management, carbon sequestration, fertilizer management, changing the human diet pattern, etc. These issues are discussed in the chapter along with relevant facts and countering strategies to address global climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banik S, Pankaj PK, Naskar S (2015) Climate change: impacts on livestock diversity in tropical countries. In: Pradeep KM, Bhatta R, Takahashi J, Richard AK, Cadaba SP (eds) Livestock production and climate change. CAB International, Boston, MA, pp 162–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bannink A, Schijndel V, Jan MW, Jan D (2011) A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch National Inventory Report using the IPCC tier 3 approach. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes AP (2013) Heterogeneity in climate change risk perception amongst dairy farmers: a latent class clustering analysis. Appl Geogr 41:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batima P, Natsagdorj L, Gombluudev P, Erdenetseteg B (2005) Observed climate change in Mongolia. AIACC working paper no.12. Available via DIALOG. http://www.start.org/Projects/AIACC_Project/working_papers/Working%20Papers/AIACC_WP_No013.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Bhuvaneshwari S, Hiroshan H, Meegoda JN (2019) Crop residue burning in India: policy challenges and potential solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(5):832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blummel M, Anandan S, Prasad CS (2009) Potential and limitations of by-product based feeding systems to mitigate greenhouse gases for improved livestock productivity. Research gate. Available via DIALOG. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283738415_Potential_and_Limitations_of_byProduct_Based_Feeding_Systems_to_Mitigate_Greenhouse_Gases_for_Improved_Livestock_Productivity. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Chase LE, Cherney DJ (2012) Using grass forages in dairy cattle rations. In Proceedings of the Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, pp. 75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier RJ, Doelger SG, Head HH, Thatcher WW, Wilcox CJ (1982) Effects of heat stress during pregnancy on maternal hormone concentrations, calf birth weight and postpartum milk yield of Holstein cows. J Anim Sci 54:309–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie A, Streck C, Roe S, Zurek M, Haupt F, Dolginow A (2014) Strategies for mitigating climate change in agriculture: Abridged report. Climate Focus and California Environmental Associates, prepared with the support of the Climate and Land Use Alliance. Available via DIALOG. https://climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/strategies_for_mitigating_climate_change_in_agriculture.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: FAO Available via DIALOG. http://wwwfaoorg/3/a-i3437epdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Gwazdauskas FC, Thatcher WW, Kiddy CA, Paape CJ, Wilcox CJ (1981) Hormonal patterns during heat stress following PGF2α induced luteal regression in heifers. Theriogenology 16:271–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess H et al (2006) Strategic use of tannins as means to limit methane emission from ruminant livestock. In. International conference on greenhouse gasses and animal agriculture, Elsevier international congress series, 2006. vol 1293. Zurich, Switzerland, pp 164–167

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF International (2013) Greenhouse gas mitigation options and costs for agricultural land and animal production within the United States. Available via DIALOG. http://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/mitigation_technologies/GHG_Mitigation_Options.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Jones AK, Jones DL, Edwards-Jones G, Cross P (2013) Informing decision making in agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation policy: a best-worst scaling survey of expert and farmer opinion in the sheep industry. Environ Sci Pol 29:46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight T, Ronimus RS, Dey D, Tootill C, Naylor G, Evans P (2011) Chloroform decreases rumen methanogenesis and methanogen populations without altering rumen function in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 16:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann F, Erb KH, Gingrich S, Lauk C, Haberl H (2008) Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: a comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol Econ 65:471–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurukulasuriya P, Rosenthal S (2003) Climate change and agriculture: A review of impacts and adaptations. Paper No. 91 in Climate Change Series, Agriculture and Rural Development Department and Environment Department, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Madan ML, Prakash BS (2007) Reproductive endocrinology and biotechnology applications among buffaloes. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64:261–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister TA, Newbold CJ (2008) Redirecting rumen methane to reduce methanogenesis. Aust J Exp Agric 48:7–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell RE, Hooven NW, Camoens JK (1976) Effect of climate on performance of Holsteins in first lactation. J Dairy Sci 59:965–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Ranieri MS, Bernabucci U (2010) Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livest Sci 130(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobel RL, Jobst SM, Dransfield MBG, Pandolfi SM, Balley TL (1997) Use of radio frequency data communication system, heat watch, to describe behavioral estrus in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 179

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara FP (2011) The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Energy Fuels 166(1):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DM, Fish RD, Winter M, Hodgson CJ, Heathwaite AL, Chadwick DR (2012) Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems. Environ Model Softw 36:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankaj PK, Ramana DBV, Rani R, Nikhila M, Sudheer D, Chowdary KP (2013) Thermotolerance of sheep in relation to coat color. J Agrometeorol 15:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Peden D, Tadesse G, Misra AK (2007) Water and livestock for human development. In: Molden D (ed) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London, pp 485–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Polley HW, Briske DD, Morgan JA, Wolter K, Bailey DW, Brown JR (2013) Climate change and north American rangelands: trends, projections, and implications. Rangel Ecol Manag 66(5):493–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TP, Pozzi F (2011) Mapping supply and demand for animal-source foods to 2030. Animal production and health working paper. No. 2. Rome. Available via DIALOG. http://www.fao.org/3/i2425e/i2425e00.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Roy AK, Agrawal RK, Bhardwaj NR, Mishra AK, Mahanta SK (2019) Revisiting National Forage Demand and availability scenario. Available via DIALOG https://wwwresearchgatenet/publication/336230799_Revisiting_National_Forage_Demand_and_Availability_Scenario. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Rosegrant MW, Fernandez M, Sinha A (2009) Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST. In: McIntyre BD, Herren HR, Wakhungu J, Watson RT (eds) International assessment of agricultural knowledge. Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Agriculture at a crossroads. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 307–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh GP, Madhu M (1999) Effect of different levels of monensin in diet on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility and methane production in cattle. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 12(8):1215–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal KK, Madhu M (2002) Uncertainty reduction in methane and nitrous oxide gases emission from livestock in India. Project report, Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India, p 62

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Ashmore M, Black H, Burgess PJ, Evans C, Quine T, Thomson AM, Hicks K, Orr H (2013) The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. J Appl Ecol 50:812–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson U, Cederberg C, Berglund M (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions in milk production. Decision support for climate certification Report 2009:3 Available via DIALOG http://wwwklimatmarkningense/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2009-2-feedpdf. Accessed 28 July 2020

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C, Alison C, Rhys G, Michel B (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Van de Steeg J, Notenbaert MH, Herrero M (2009) The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: a review of what we know and what we need to know. Agric Syst 101:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello F, Schmidhuber J, Howden M, Neofotis PG, Park S, Fernandes E, Thapa D (2008) Climate change response strategies for agriculture: challenges and opportunities for the 21st century. Agriculture and rural development discussion paper, p. 42

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Phand, S., Pankaj, P.K. (2021). Climate-Resilient Livestock Farming to Ensure Food and Nutritional Security. In: Hebsale Mallappa, V.K., Shirur, M. (eds) Climate Change and Resilient Food Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4538-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics