Abstract
In the last decades, the advances in data gathering technologies, from high-throughput sequencing to “omics” analyses, has changed the approach to biology. From an engineering point of view, biological research is a “reverse-engineering problem”, where scientists try to unravel the mechanisms that allow and support life in living organisms. Traditionally, biology was approached using a bottom-up approach, where each individual actor (molecules, cells, organs) was individually studied, with the hope of later understanding the functioning of the whole biological system by “assembling” the functionalities of its individual components. Unfortunately, the data gathered in the last decades demonstrated that this is not possible because biological systems are complex systems. Mathematics tells us that to understand a complex system we must understand the relations between the parts. The system as a whole determines how the parts behave. Doing otherwise would be like trying to understand how a flock of birds move by individually studying each bird (Fig. 9.1). In this chapter we discuss how Systems biology is, in our view, the most promising methodological approach to study biological systems, and how an “engineering mind” is necessary to understand, coordinate, and exploit the challenging mix of competences required to tackle their complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A “standard” is certified by a standard certification authority (like IEEE), not defined or “customized” by each individual research group. There are also “de-facto” standards, not officially recognized but widely used in scientific communities. Nevertheless, this does not to be the case in the Life Science community.
References
Agarwal, V., Bell, G.W., Nam, J.-W., et al.: Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 4, e05005 (2015)
Alon, U.: Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science. 301(5641), 1866–1867 (2003)
Barabasi, A.L., Oltvai, Z.N.: Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5(2), 101–113 (2004)
Bardini, R., Politano, G., Benso, A., et al.: Multi-level and hybrid modelling approaches for systems biology. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 15, 396–402 (2017a)
Bardini, R., Politano, G., Benso, A., Di Carlo, S.: Multi-level and hybrid modelling approaches for systems biology. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 15, 396–402 (2017b)
Bhattacharya, A., Cui, Y.: SomamiR 2.0: a database of cancer somatic mutations altering microRNA-ceRNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(D1), D1005–D1010 (2016)
Bonzanni, N., Feenstra, K.A., Fokkink, W., et al.: Petri Nets are a Biologist’s Best Friend. Springer, Cham (2014)
Calderone, A., Castagnoli, L., Cesareni, G.: Mentha: a resource for browsing integrated protein-interaction networks. Nat. Methods. 10(8), 690–691 (2013)
Chambers, J., Davies, M., Gaulton, A., et al.: UniChem: a unified chemical structure cross-referencing and identifier tracking system. J Cheminform. 5(1), 3 (2013)
Chou, C.-H., Shrestha, S., Yang, C.-D., et al.: miRTarBase update 2018: a resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(D1), D296–D302 (2018)
Degenring, D., Rohl, M., Uhrmacher, A.M.: Discrete event, multi-level simulation of metabolite channeling. Biosystems. 75(1–3), 29–41 (2004)
Du, J., Yuan, Z., Ma, Z., et al.: KEGG-PATH: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes-based pathway analysis using a PATH analysis model. Mol. BioSyst. 10(9), 2441–2447 (2014)
Emmert-Streib, F., Glazko, G.V.: Pathway analysis of expression data: deciphering functional building blocks of complex diseases. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(5), e1002053 (2011)
Fortuna, I., Perrone, G.C., Krug, M.S., et al.: CompuCell3D simulations reproduce mesenchymal cell migration on flat substrates. Biophys. J. 118, 2801 (2020)
Gorochowski, T.E.: Agent-based modelling in synthetic biology. Essays Biochem. 60(4), 325–336 (2016)
Heiner, M., Gilbert, D.: How Might Petri Nets Enhance your Systems Biology Toolkit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin (2011)
Heiner, M., Gilbert, D., Donaldson, R.: Petri Nets for Systems and Synthetic Biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin (2008)
Hinske, L.C.G., Galante, P.A.F., Kuo, W.P., et al.: A potential role for intragenic miRNAs on their hosts’ interactome. BMC Genomics. 11, 533 (2010)
Jasim Mohammed, M., Ibrahim, R.W., Ahmad, M.Z.: Periodicity computation of generalized mathematical biology problems involving delay differential equations. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24(3), 737–740 (2017)
Kaplan, S., Bren, A., Dekel, E., et al.: The incoherent feed-forward loop can generate non-monotonic input functions for genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 203 (2008)
Konagurthu, A.S., Lesk, A.M.: Single and multiple input modules in regulatory networks. Proteins. 73(2), 320–324 (2008)
Loewe, L., Hillston, J.: Computational models in systems biology. Genome Biol. 9(12), 328 (2008)
Mathelier, A., Zhao, X., Zhang, A.W., et al.: JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(Database issue), D142–D147 (2014)
Maus, C., Rybacki, S., Uhrmacher, A.M.: Rule-based multi-level modeling of cell biological systems. BMC Syst. Biol. 5, 166 (2011)
North, M.J., Collier, N.T., Vos, J.R.: Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 16(1), 1–25 (2006)
Politano, G., Benso, A., Savino, A., et al.: ReNE: a cytoscape plugin for regulatory network enhancement. PLoS One. 9(12), e115585 (2014)
Politano, G., Orso, F., Raimo, M., et al.: CyTRANSFINDER: a Cytoscape 3.3 plugin for three-component (TF, gene, miRNA) signal transduction pathway construction. BMC Bioinformatics. 17, 157 (2016)
Politano, G., Di Carlo, S., Benso, A.: ‘One DB to rule them all’-the RING: a Regulatory INteraction Graph combining TFs, genes/proteins, SNPs, diseases and drugs. Database (Oxford). 2019, baz108 (2019)
Razick, S., Magklaras, G., Donaldson, I.M.: iRefIndex: a consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics. 9, 405–405 (2008)
Regev, A., Silverman, W., Shapiro, E.: Representation and simulation of biochemical processes using the pi-calculus process algebra. In Pac Symp Biocomput. p. 459–470 (2001)
Schaefer, U., Schmeier, S., Bajic, V.B.: TcoF-DB: dragon database for human transcription co-factors and transcription factor interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(Database issue), D106–D110 (2011)
Suzuki, Y., Asai, Y., Oka, H., et al.: A platform for in silico modeling of physiological systems III. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 2803–2806 (2009)
Szklarczyk, D., Franceschini, A., Wyder, S., et al.: STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(Database issue), D447–D452 (2015)
Valk, R.: Object petri nets: using the nets-within-nets paradigm. In Lectures on Concurrency and Petri Nets (2003)
Wu, G., Feng, X., Stein, L.: A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol. 11(5), R53 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benso, A., Di Carlo, S., Politano, G. (2021). Engineering Minds for Biologists. In: Suravajhala, P.N. (eds) Your Passport to a Career in Bioinformatics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9544-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9544-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9543-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9544-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)