Skip to main content

Indian Agro-wastes for 2G Biorefineries: Strategic Decision on Conversion Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Energy Technology and Policies

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Biorefineries are globally contemplated as the viable platforms for the highly anticipated substitution of fossil-based economy by the bio-based economy. A biorefinery offers the advantage of converting a remarkable variety of biomass feedstocks to different types of biofuels and biochemicals. A great extent of rigorous effort is currently being made for the upgrading of existing biorefinery frameworks to fully attain the sustainability standards required to warrant their full-scale implementation. As a consequence of the mandatory inclusion of the sustainability goals into the biorefinery concept and the escalating concern on the ‘food-fuel conflict’, the second generation (2G) of biorefineries are garnering quick popularity over their first-generation counterparts. In India, there exist huge prospects of development of 2G biorefineries exploiting the abundant resources of the lignocellulosic agro-wastes. Indian agro-wastes display an extraordinary variety of lignocellulosic biomass and round-the-year availability in copious amounts. Unfortunately, due to lack of awareness and poor valorization, these valuable agro-wastes are often destroyed in mass scale for waste management instead of being utilized in a productive way. The major focus of the present chapter is to present a categorical classification of Indian agro-wastes based on their appearance in the supply chain. The adaptability of Indian agro-wastes towards 2G biorefinery has been assessed using their availability, thermochemical properties and composition of a few specific feedstocks, namely, rice straw, rice husk, wheat straw, oil seed press cakes, sugarcane bagasse, coconut shell, banana peels and stems. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been used to decide on the strategy of application of stand-alone biochemical or thermochemical processes and their hybrids for the conversion of different candidate feedstocks in the 2G biorefineries with respect to sustainability parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viaggi D, Mantino F, Mazzocchi M, Moro D, Stefani G (2012) From agricultural to bio-based economics? Context, state of the art and challenges. Bio-based Appl Econ 1(1):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Priefer C, Jörissen J, Frör O (2017) Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. Resources 6(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Philp JC, Pavanan KC (2013) Bio-based production in a bioeconomy. Asian Biotechnol Develop Rev 15(2):81–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P, Wellisch M (2012). Bio-based chemicals value added products from biorefineries. IEA Bioenergy Task42 Biorefinery

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sun R (2010) Cereal straw as a resource for sustainable biomaterials and biofuels: chemistry, extractives, lignins, hemicelluloses and cellulose. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mtui GY (2009) Recent advances in pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes and production of value added products. African J Biotechnol 8(8)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rooni V, Raud M, Kikas T (2017) Technical solutions used in different pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Agron Res 15(3):848–858

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wi SG, Cho EJ, Lee DS, Lee SJ, Lee YJ, Bae HJ (2015) Lignocellulose conversion for biofuel: a new pretreatment greatly improves downstream biocatalytic hydrolysis of various lignocellulosic materials. Biotechnol Biofuels 8(1):228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brethauer S, Studer MH (2015) Biochemical conversion processes of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals–a review. CHIMIA Int J Chem 69(10):572–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nanda S, Mohammad J, Reddy SN, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK (2014) Pathways of lignocellulosic biomass conversion to renewable fuels. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 4(2):157–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Limayem A, Ricke SC (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(4):449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkar A, Chowdhury R (2016) Co-pyrolysis of paper waste and mustard press cake in a semi-batch pyrolyzer—optimization and bio-oil characterization. Int J Green Energy 13(4):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arvidsson M, Morandin M, Harvey S (2015) Biomass gasification-based syngas production for a conventional oxo synthesis plant—greenhouse gas emission balances and economic evaluation. J Clean Prod 99:192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(30):11206–11210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gowen MM (1989) Biofuel v fossil fuel economics in developing countries: How green is the pasture? Energy Policy 17(5):455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasana H, Ghozali I (2017) The impact of fossil and renewable energy consumption on the economic growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(3):194–200

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed K (2017) Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus in BRICS economies. Energy 128:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh J, Gu S (2010) Biomass conversion to energy in India—a critique. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(5):1367–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar A, Kumar N, Baredar P, Shukla A (2015) A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cardoen D, Joshi P, Diels L, Sarma PM, Pant D (2015) Agriculture biomass in India: Part 1. estimation and characterization. Resour Conserv Recycl 102:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gabhane J, Tripathi A, Athar S, William SP, Vaidya AN, Wate SR (2016) Assessment of bioenergy potential of agricultural wastes: a case study cum template. J Biofuels Bioenergy 2(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abraham A, Mathew AK, Sindhu R, Pandey A, Binod P (2016) Potential of rice straw for bio-refining: an overview. Biores Technol 215:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Demirbas A (2010) Biorefineries for biomass upgrading facilities. Green Energy Technol

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Jong E, Jungmeier G (2015) Biorefinery concepts in comparison to petrochemical refineries. Ind Biorefineries White Biotechnol 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cherubini F, Jungmeier G, Wellisch M, Willke T, Skiadas I, Van Ree R, De Jong E (2009) Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 3(5):534–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):578–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alaswad A, Dassisti M, Prescott T, Olabi AG (2015) Technologies and developments of third generation biofuel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1446–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Valentine J, Clifton‐Brown J, Hastings A, Robson P, Allison G, Smith P (2012) Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production. GCB Bioenergy 4(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson PB (2012) The agricultural ethics of biofuels: the food vs. fuel debate. Agriculture 2(4):339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohanty P, Pant KK, Naik SN, Das LM, Vasudevan P (2011) Fuel production from biomass: Indian perspective for pyrolysis oil

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ingale LT, Dube KJ, Sarode DB, Attarde SB, Ingle ST (2013) Monitoring and respiratory health assessment of the population exposed to cooking fuel emissions in a rural area of Jalgaon District, India. Asia Pacific J Public Health 25(6):463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Paliwal U, Sharma M, Burkhart JF (2016) Monthly and spatially resolved black carbon emission inventory of India: uncertainty analysis. Atmos Chem Phys 6(19):12457–12476

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trivedi A, Verma AR, Kaur S, Jha B, Vijay V, Chandra R, Prasad R (2017) Sustainable bio-energy production models for eradicating open field burning of paddy straw in Punjab, India. Energy 127:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kataki R, Chutia RS, Mishra M, Bordoloi N, Saikia R, Bhaskar T (2015) Feedstock suitability for thermochemical processes

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghosh S, Chowdhury R, Bhattacharya P (2017) Sustainability of cereal straws for the fermentative production of second generation biofuels: a review of the efficiency and economics of biochemical pretreatment processes. Appl Energy 198:284–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarkar S (1974) Fuels and combustion. Universities Press

    Google Scholar 

  37. http://powermin.nic.in/en/content/power-sector-glance-all-india

  38. Tanger P, Field JL, Jahn CE, DeFoort MW, Leach JE (2013) Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges. Frontiers Plant Sci 4

    Google Scholar 

  39. Debnath B, Biswas NT, Baidya R, Ghosh SK (2014) Nanotechnology in waste water treatment: a review. Ecol Urban Areas 2014:563

    Google Scholar 

  40. Saaty TL (2002) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Scientia Iranica 9(3):215–229

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  42. Saaty TL, Kearns KP (2014) Analytical planning: the organization of system, vol 7. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baidya R, Ghosh SK, Debnath B (2015) Analysis of parameters for green computing approach using the analytical hierarchy process. In: 2015 International conference on energy economics and environment (ICEEE), pp. 1–4. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw—Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Saaty TL (1985) Decision making for leaders. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern 3:450–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sehwag S, Das M (2015) A brief overview: present status on utilization of mustard oil and cake

    Google Scholar 

  47. Raj T, Kapoor M, Gaur R, Christopher J, Lamba B, Tuli DK, Kumar R (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of various Indian agriculture residues for biofuels production. Energy Fuels 29(5):3111–3118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brijwani K, Vadlani PV (2011) Solid state fermentation of soybean hulls for cellulolytic enzymes production. Soybean-Appl Technol

    Google Scholar 

  49. Balan V, Rogers CA, Chundawat SP, da Costa Sousa L, Slininger PJ, Gupta R, Dale BE (2009) Conversion of extracted oil cake fibers into bioethanol including DDGS, canola, sunflower, sesame, soy, and peanut for integrated biodiesel processing. J American Oil Chemists’ Soc 86(2):157–165

    Google Scholar 

  50. Franco HCJ, Pimenta MTB, Carvalho JLN, Magalhães PS, Rossell CEV, Braunbeck OA, Rossi Neto J (2013) Assessment of sugarcane trash for agronomic and energy purposes in Brazil. Scientia Agricola 70(5):305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xiao B, Sun X, Sun R (2001) Chemical, structural, and thermal characterizations of alkali-soluble lignins and hemicelluloses, and cellulose from maize stems, rye straw, and rice straw. Polym Degrad Stab 74(2):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/17540/7/07_chapter%202.pdf

  53. Fernandes ERK, Marangoni C, Medeiros SHW, Souza O, Sellin N (2012) Slow pyrolysis of banana culture waste: leaves and pseudostem. In: 3rd International conference on industrial and hazardous waste management

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ross K, Mazza G (2011) Comparative analysis of pyrolysis products from a variety of herbaceous Canadian crop residues. World J Agric Sci 7(6):763–776

    Google Scholar 

  55. Raj T, Kapoor M, Gaur R, Christopher J, Lamba B, Tuli DK, Kumar R (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of various Indian agriculture residues for biofuels production. Energy Fuels 29(5):3111–3118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mohammed TH, Lakhmiri R, Azmani A, Hassan II (2014) Bio-oil from pyrolysis of castor shell. Int J Basic Appl Sci 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sarkar A, Mondal B, Chowdhury R (2014) Mathematical modeling of a semibatch pyrolyser for sesame oil cake. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(51):19671–19680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li J, Chen Y, Yang H, Zhu D, Chen X, Wang X, Chen H (2017) The correlation of feedstock and bio-oil compounds distribution. Energy Fuels

    Google Scholar 

  59. Abdullah N, Sulaiman F, Miskam MA, Taib RM (2014) Characterization of banana (Musa spp.) pseudo-stem and fruit-bunch-stem as a potential renewable energy resource. Int J Biol Vet Agric Food Eng 8(8):712

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pilon G (2007) Utilization of arecanut (Areca catechu) husk for gasification

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ramachandra TV, Kamakshi G (2005) Bioresource potential of Karnataka (No. 109). Technical report

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author acknowledges INNO-INDIGO for the selection of collaborative CONVER-B project on Biobased Energy. All authors acknowledge the valuable comments made by the learned reviewers for the upgradation of the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjana Chowdhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chowdhury, R., Ghosh, S., Debnath, B., Manna, D. (2018). Indian Agro-wastes for 2G Biorefineries: Strategic Decision on Conversion Processes. In: De, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Assadi, M., Mukherjee, D. (eds) Sustainable Energy Technology and Policies. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7188-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7188-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7187-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7188-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics