Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Model to Predict Risk of Urinary Tract Infection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CMBEBIH 2017

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 62))

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections and account for a significant part of the workload in clinical microbiology laboratories. Hence, urine is the specimen most frequently submitted for culture. Physicians distinguish UTIs from other diseases that have similar clinical presentations with use of a small number of tests to distinguish bacteriuria. The microbiological examination of urine consists of examining a methylene smear of the urine specimen, a screening test of significant bacteriuria and culture. In the smear one or more bacterial cells per oil-immersion field usually implies that there are 105 or more bacteria per milliliter in the specimen, the number of RBC and WBC is also a very important indicator. In literature, the normal ranges of these variables are differently defined. The analysis of this data could be very simplified using data management systems. Fuzzy logic, in a narrow sense, is a logical system, which is an extension of multivalued logic. The fuzzy logic works on a theory which relates to classes of objects with blurred boundaries in which membership is a matter of degree. This enables fuzzy systems applicable to broad range of parameters and expected output values in many aspects of science. The aim of this study was to create a fuzzy model, in the MATLAB environment, to aid physicians in interpreting the results of the microscopic urine analysis, considering the number of bacteria, RBC and WBC as well as turbidity of the sample.

The original version of this chapter was revised: The spacing error in fifth author’s name has been corrected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wilson M L, Gaido L (2004). Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(8): 1150—1158.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ronald A (2003). The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Disease-a-Month, 49(2), 71-82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arslan H, Azap Ö K, Ergönül Ö et al (2005) Risk factors for ciprofloxacin resistance among Escherichia coli strains isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Turkey. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 56(5), 914-918.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wagenlehner, Florian M E, Naber Kurt G (2006). Treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections: presence and future. European urology.,49(2): 235—244.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vandepitte J, Verhaegen J, Engbaek K et al (2003). Basic laboratory procedures in clinical bacteriology Ed 2. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pollock C, Liu P L, Gyory A Z, et al (1989). Dysmorphism of urinary red blood cells–value in diagnosis. Kidney international. 36(6): 1045—1049.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leibovici L, Fishman M, Schonheyder H C et al (2000). A causal probabilistic network for optimal treatment of bacterial infections. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12(4), 517-528.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kao H Y, Li H L (2005). A diagnostic reasoning and optimal treatment model for bacterial infections with fuzzy information. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 77(1), 23-37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alayón S, Robertson R, Warfield S K et al (2008). A Fuzzy System for Helping Medical Diagnosis of Malform-ations of Cortical Development. J Biomed Inform. PMC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beth A, Sproule B A, Naranjo C A et al (2002). Fuzzy pharmacology: Theory and application. Trends Pharmacology. Sci., 23 (9): 412-417.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papageorgiou E I (2012). Fuzzy cognitive map software tool for treatment management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 105(3), 233-245.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MATLAB, The Math Works, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  13. https://www.mathworks.com/help/fuzzy/what-is-fuzzy-logic.html

  14. Baig F, Khan M S, Noor Y et al (2011). International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering(IJCSE),3(5): 2093.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poongodi M, Manjula L, Pradeepkumar S et al (2012). Cancer Prediction Techniques using Fuzzy Logic. International Journal of Current Research. 4 (02): . 106-110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monia Avdic Ibrisimovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ibrisimovic, M.A., Karlı, G., Balkaya, H.E., Ibrisimovic, M., Hukic, M. (2017). A Fuzzy Model to Predict Risk of Urinary Tract Infection. In: Badnjevic, A. (eds) CMBEBIH 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 62. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4165-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4166-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics