Skip to main content

Feminized Digital Sociality and Online Philanthropy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

Feminized forms of digital labor are coded as relational/interpersonal and learned mostly defined through women’s social spaces offline. In this chapter, we examine how this feminized digital labor plays out at the intersection of digital financialization and digital philanthropy at microfinance sites such as kiva.org.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Castells M (2011) The rise of the network society. Volume I, The information age: economy, society, and culture. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney-Lippold J (2011) A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory Cult Soc 28(6):164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery M (2007) Kiva and the birth of person-to-person microfinance. Innovations, 2(1-2):31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajjala R (2017) Online philanthropy in the global north and south: connecting, microfinancing, and gaming for change. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard A (2008) 5 questions for Jessica Flannery, co-founder/chief marketing officer, kiva. Retrieved from http://philanthropynewsdigest.org/5-questions-for/jessica-flannery-kiva

  • Jarrett K (2015) Feminism, labour and digital media: the digital housewife. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H, Ford S, Green J (2013) Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (2000) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender D (1995) Nattering on the net: women, power, and cyberspace. Spinifex Press, North Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak GC (2000) From Haverstock Hill flat to U.S. classroom, what’s left of theory? In: Butler J, Guillory J, Thomas K (eds) What’s left of theory? New work on the politics of literary theory. Routledge, New York, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova T (2000) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Soc Text 18(2):33–58. https://muse.jhu.edu/. Retrieved 1 Jan 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing A (2005) Friction: an ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman E (1996) Come, in, CQ: the body on the wire. Educom Rev 31(6):46. Retrieved 1 Jan 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel L (2013) Marxism and the oppression of women: toward a unitary theory. Brill Publishers, Leiden/Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell M (2013) Affect and discourse – what’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity 6(4):349–368. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radhika Gajjala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gajjala, R., Wauthier, K. (2019). Feminized Digital Sociality and Online Philanthropy. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_58-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_58-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics