Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Multiple Meanings of Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Perspectives

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 23))

Abstract

The word landscape has multiple meanings in common language. It refers to a tract of land as well to its visual appearance. It used to denote a territory as well as historical and geographical regions and refers to an area shaped in a characteristic way by the people living in it. Landscape as scenery had an important influence on imagination and artistic presentation. Subtle differences exist between languages, which sometimes make translations confusing. Adjectives are used to describe more precisely the meaning in a given context. The distinction between natural and cultural landscapes has been important in the development of different approaches. Many other specifications, such as rural and urban landscape, countryside and picturesque landscape, add to the complexity. Formal definitions were made by conventions, such as the cultural landscapes in the UNESCO World Heritage Convention and the definition given by the European Landscape Convention. In particular, the latter initiated rethinking landscape policy and stimulated transdisciplinary approaches to landscape in an international perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antikainen, J. (2005). The concept of functional urban area – Findings of the ESPON project 1.1.1. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, Heft, 7, 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. (2000). Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. (2003). Expectations of scientists towards interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary research. In B. Tress, G. Tress, & G. Fry (Eds.), Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations, Delta series 2 (pp. 44–54). Wageningen: Delta Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1–2, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartleby.com. (2001). www.bartleby.com/24/2/

  • Bell, S., 1999. Landscape. Pattern, perception and process. Taylor & Francis Group London., 344p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berque, A. (1982). Vivre l’espace au Japon. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brassley, P. (1998). On the unrecognized significance of the ephermerical landscape. Landscape Research, 23(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1757). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, Harvard classics, Vol.24, Part 2 (pp. 1909–1914). New York: P.F. Collier & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P. (1995). A new phase of urban development in Western Europe? The evidence for the 1980s. Urban Studies, 32(7), 1045–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claval, P. L. (2004). The languages of rural landscapes. In H. Palang, H. Sooväli, M. Antrop, & S. Setten (Eds.), European rural landscapes: Persistence and change in a globalising environment (pp. 11–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2003). Landscape: Ecology and semiosis. In H. Palang & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes (pp. 15–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2004). Landscape and landschaft. Lecture at the “Spatial Turn in History” Symposium German historical institute. GHI Bulletin, 35, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D., & Daniels, S. (1988). The iconography of landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2000). European landscape convention. Firenze, 20.10.2000 http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm

  • Dodgshon, R. A., & Olsson, E. G. A. (2007). Seasonality in European mountain areas: A study in human ecology. In H. Palang, H. Sooväli, & A. Printsmann (Eds.), Seasonal landscapes, Landscape series (Vol. 7, pp. 85–101). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EEA. (2002). Urban morphological zones 2000 (UMZ2000). http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban-morphological-zones-2000-umz2000-f1v0. Consulted 24 Apr 2013.

  • European Commission. (2008). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/index_en.htm.

  • Fahrig, L. (2005). When is a landscape perspective important? In J. A. Wiens & M. R. Moss (Eds.), 1999. Issues in landscape ecology, Studies in landscape ecology (pp. 3–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, G., & Rippon, S. (Eds.) (2002). Europe’s cultural landscape: Archaeologists and the management of change. Europae Archaeologiae Consilium, Occasional paper 2, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G. (2003). From objects to landscapes in natural and cultural heritage management: a role for landscape interfaces. In H. Palang & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes (pp. 15–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, W. (1768). An essay on prints: Containing remarks upon the principles of picturesque beauty; the different kinds of prints; and the characters of the most noted masters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granö, J. G. (1929). Reine Geographie. Eine methodologische Studie beleuchtet mit Beispielen aus Finnland und Estland. Helsinki, Helsingfors, Acta Geographica, 2(2), 202 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granö, O., & Paasi, A. (Eds.). (1997). Pure geography. J.G. Granö., translated by M. Hicks. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press. 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, P., & Bressi, T. W. (Eds.). (1997). Understanding ordinary landscapes (272 pp). New haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulinck, H. (2004). Neo-rurality and multifucntional landscapes. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional landscapes. Theory, values and history (Vol. Vol. I, pp. 63–74). Southampton: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (2001). A look at the political geography of environmental management. In A. Buttimer (Ed.), Sustainable landscapes and lifeways: Scale and appropriateness (pp. 35–58). Sterling: Cork University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young, R. H. (2000). Sustainable development and sustainable landscapes: Defining a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Fennia, 178(1), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography. A critical survey of current thought in the light of the past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 29(3–4), 173–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1961). The nature of geography. Reprinted with corrections from the Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 504 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. J. (1991). Landscapes: The artists’ vision. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. J. (2011). An Introduction to landscape (309 p). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2003). Human geographical landscapes: J.G. Granö’s approach to landscapes as scientist and artist. In O. Granö (Ed.), Origin of landscape science. J.G. Granö an a new pure geography for a new state (pp. 71–98). Turku: The Turku University Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2005). Law and landscape – Some historical-geographical studies from Northern Europe. In M. Jones & T. Peil (Eds.), Landscape, law and justice (pp. 95–109). Odo: Novus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2007). Seasonality and landscape in Northern Europe: An introductory exploration. In H. Palang, H. Sooväli, & A. Printsmann (Eds.), Seasonal landscapes, Landscape series (Vol. 7, pp. 17–60). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & Stenseke, M. (Eds.). (2011). The European landscape convention. Challenges of participation, Landscape series, Vol. 13 (326 pp). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1764). Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/41197

  • Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6343

  • Kizos, T. (2007). Island lifestyles in the Aegean Islands, Greece: Heaven in summer, hell in winter? In: Jones, M., 2007. Seasonality and landscape in Northern Europe: An introductory exploration. In H. Palang, H. Sooväli, & A. Printsmann (Eds.), Seasonal landscapes, Landscape series (Vol. 7, pp. 127–149). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lörzing, H. (2001). The nature of landscape. A personal quest (176 pp). Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1975). Past time present place: Landscape and memory. The Geographical Review, 65(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1997). European landscape transformations: The rural residue. In P. Groth & T. W. Bressi (Eds.), Understanding ordinary landscapes (Yale University Press ed., pp. 180–188). New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbühl, Y. (2012). La mise en scène du monde. Construction du paysage européen (p. 432). Paris: CRNS Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally, R. (2005). Scale and an organism-centric focus for studying interspecific interactions in landscapes. In J. A. Wiens & M. R. Moss (Eds.), 1999. Issues in landscape ecology, Studies in landscape ecology (pp. 52–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhzoumi, J. M. (2002). Landscape in the Middle East: An inquiry. Landscape Research, 27(3), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, K. (2011). Landscape versus region – Part II. In J. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to human geography (pp. 130–145). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, R. (1999). Approaches to landscape (310 pp). London: MacMillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, R. (2000). The new reading the landscape. Fieldwork in landscape history (256 pp). Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z. (2000). What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z., & Lieberman, A. (1994). Landscape ecology: Theory and application (360 pp). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Defining functional urban areas (FUA) for the OECD metropolitan database. OECD, 9 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(4), 630–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2002). Landscape, nature and the body politic: From Britain’s renaissance to America’s new world (299 pp). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. (2004). A theoretical reflexive approach to the historical aspects of multifunctionality in landscapes: Opposing views. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional landscapes. Theory, values and history (Vol. I, pp. 115–136). Southampton: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. (2005a). Editorial: Law, polity and the changing meaning of landscape. Landscape Research, 30(3), 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. (2005b). The Landscape of ‘customary’ law versus that of ‘natural’ law. Landscape Research, 30(3), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. (2013). The law of landscape and the landscape of law: The things that matter. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge compagnion to landscape studies (pp. 253–262). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang, H., & Fry, G. (Eds.). (2003). Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes (406 pp). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M., & Setten, S. (2004). European rural landscapes: Persistence and change in a globalising environment (p. 482). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palang, H., Sooväli, H., & Printsmann, A. (Eds.). (2007). Seasonal landscapes, Landscape series (Vol. 7, p. 256). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, D. (2011). Functional urban regions database. Technical Report, ESPON, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C.O.. (1925). The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geography, 2; Reprinted in Leighly, J. (ed.), 1974. Land and life (pp. 315–350). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and memory (p. 652). New York: A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2004). Barriers and bridges to sustaining cultural landscapes. In R. H. G. Jongman (Ed.), The new dimensions of the European landscape, Wageningen UR frontis series vol. 4 (pp. 93–102). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanners, D., & Bourdeau, Ph. (eds). (1995). Europe’s Environment. The Dobris Assessment. European Environment Agency, EC DG XI and Phare, Copenhagen, pp. 676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobbelaar, D. J., & Hendriks, K.. (2007). Seasonality of agricultural landscapes: Reading time and place by colours and schapes. In: Jones, M., 2007. Seasonality and landscape in Northern Europe: An introductory exploration. In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Printsmann, A., (eds), 2007. Seasonal Landscapes. Springer, Landscape Series, Vol.7, pp. 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress, G. (2003). Expectations of policy-makers, funding bodies and end-users towards interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. In B. Tress, G. Tress, A. van der Valk, & G. Fry (Eds.), Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations, Delta series 2 (18 p). Wageningen: Delta Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. (1998). Landscape planning and environmental impact design (425 pp). London: UCL Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1992). http://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/#1

  • Van Eetvelde, V., & Antrop, M. (2004). Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes – two examples from Southern France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1–4), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, W.. (2000). The history of European landscape painting. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (eds.), From Landscape ecology to landscape science (pp. 81–96). Wageningen: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S. (1995). Land ecology (199 pp). Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing bv.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Marc Antrop & Veerle Van Eetvelde

Authors
  1. Marc Antrop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veerle Van Eetvelde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Antrop, M., Van Eetvelde, V. (2017). The Multiple Meanings of Landscape. In: Landscape Perspectives. Landscape Series, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation