Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment in Early Childhood Science Education

  • Chapter
Research in Early Childhood Science Education

Abstract

The state of research and practice in early childhood science education is at a critical tipping point. The encouraging news is the considerable national, state and local activity around early childhood science education. An increased focus on science has the potential for improving multiple areas of school readiness through learning opportunities that draw on young children’s natural curiosity to understand their world. Active engagement in doing science also provides young children with a foundation for thinking and problem solving that can serve as cognitive models for the challenging years of school that lie ahead. The flip side, however, is the dearth of empirical research validating the effectiveness of science activities and early childhood science curricula. A major barrier to conducting such research is the lack of reliable and valid assessments to provide a strong evidence base on best practices in science education, key factors that support these practices and how these practices affect young children’s competence in science. This chapter presents an assessment framework for programs seeking solid evidence to understand what constitutes best practices in early childhood science consistent with the recently published Next Generation Science Standards. The current state of assessment in early childhood science is also reviewed. Chapter sections cover summative, screening and formative assessments of children’s science competence, teacher’s science pedagogical knowledge, teaching practices, and attitudes and beliefs about science, and assessing classrooms for facilitating science learning. Although very little critically needed assessment work has been published, promising work is underway and is also reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Administration for Children and Families. (2006). FACES 2003 research brief: Children’s outcomes and program quality in Head Start. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • AERA/APA/NCME. (1999). Standards for the educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashbrook, P. (2003). Science is simple: Over 250 activities for preschoolers. Beltsville: Gryphon House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Decker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S., Epstein, D. F., Carolan, M. E., Fitzgerald, J., Ackerman, D. J., & Friedman, A. H. (2010). The state of preschool 2010. New Brunswick: National Institute for Early Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, D. W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 17(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrueco, S., López, M., Ong, C., & Lozano, P. (2012). Assessing Spanish-English bilingual preschoolers. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, J. R., Bergan, J. R., Rattee, M., Feld, J. K., Smith, K., Cunningham, K., et al. (2003). The Galileo system for electronic management of learning (10th ed.). Tuscon: Assessment Technology, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, J. R., Guerrera Burnham, C., Feld, J. K., & Bergan, J. R. (2009). The Galileo pre-K online system for the electronic management of learning technical manual. Tucson: Assessment Technology Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., Jung, K., Stevenson-Garcia, J., & Frede, E. (2011, September). Assessing supports for learning: Preschool Rating Instrument for Science and Mathematics (PRISM). Paper presentation, Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Fall Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. T. (2005). The influence of teachers’ efficacy and beliefs regarding mathematics instruction in the early child classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Greenfield, D.B. (2006). Early childhood hands-on science (ECHOS) curriculum and development project. Institute of Education Sciences Goal 2 Development Grant: R305K060036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J., & Greenfield, D.B. (2010). Early childhood hands-on science (ECHOS). Institute of Education Sciences Goal 3 RCT efficacy Grant: R305A100275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V., Peisner-Feinberg, E., & Burchinal, M. (2012). Recognition & response: Developing and evaluating a model of RTI for pre-k. Washington, DC: Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness annual conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, R., Fix, M., Ost, J., Reardon-Anderson, J., & Passel, J. S. (2004). The health and well being of young children and immigrants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. (2001). Cognition and instruction: Enriching the laboratory school experience of children, teachers, parents, and undergraduates. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 385–426). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalufour, I., Worth, K., & Clark-Chiarelli. (2009). Science teaching and environment rating scale. Newton: Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & McNamee, G. D. (2007). Bridging: Assessment for teaching and learning in early childhood classrooms, preK-3. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Chiarelli, N., Chalufour, I., & Hoisington, C. A. (2009a). Science teacher performance tasks. Newton: Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Chiarelli, N., Chalufour, I., & Hoisington, C. A. (2009b). Science fidelity of implementation measure. Newton: Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A. M. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. ix–xv). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory, (Chapter 4). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Examiner’s manual for the Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, A. S. (2010). The high scope preschool curriculum: Science and technology. Ypsilanti: HighScope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Office of Early Learning. (2010). Florida Kindergarten Readiness Screener (FLKRS). Tallahassee,: Florida Office of Early Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., Brenneman, K., MacDonald, G., & Roman, M. (2010). Preschool Pathways to Science (PrePS), facilitating scientific ways of thinking, talking, doing, and understanding. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. (2007). Phonological skills in Puerto Rican and Mexican Spanish-speaking children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistic and Phonetics, 21, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnick, A., & Schulz, L. (2007). Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, computation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B. (2009). Lens on science: Development and validation of a computer-administered, adaptive, IRT-based science assessment for preschool children. Institute of Education Sciences Goal 5 Measurement Grant: R305A090502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B. (2011a, March and September). Measurement issues for preschool science. Invited presentation for symposium, So you want to study X, but how are you going to measure it? Washington, DC: IES Principal Investigator’s Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B. (2011b, August). Science instruction in preschool? Perspectives from the U.S.A. and why the time is right.” Invited Talk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B. (2013). Enfoque en Ciencia: Extending the cultural and linguistic validity of a computer adaptive assessment of science readiness for use with young Latino children. Institute of Education Sciences Goal 5 Measurement Grant: R305A130612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B., Dominguez, X., Fuccillo, J., Maier, M., & Greenberg, A. (2011, September). Lens on science: A touch screen, computer adaptive system for assessing science in young children. Invited symposium presentation, Assessment in early childhood mathematics and science, Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Fall Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Fuccillo, J. M., Maier, M., & Penfield, R. (2015). Development and initial validation of the preschool science assessment: An item response theory-based assessment of preschool science knowledge and process skills. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Maier, M. F., & Fuccillo, J. M. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20, 238–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropen, J., Clark-Chiarelli, N., Hoisington, C., & Ehrlich, S. B. (2011). The importance of executive function in early science education. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropen, J., Clark-Chiarelli, N., & Hoisington, C. (2010). The preschool assessment of science: A performance-based measure of young children’s scientific thinking. Newton: Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Simon-Cereijido, G., & Wagner, C. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head Start Bureau. (2011). Head start child development and early learning framework. Retrieved from eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/…/HS_Revised_Child_Outcomes_Framework.pdf

  • Heroman, C., Trister Dodge, D., Kai-lee Berke, K., & Bickart, T. (2010). The creative curriculum for preschool (5th ed.). Bethesda: Teaching Strategies, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C., & Cordray, D. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C., & Cordray, D. (2010, March). Achieving relative intervention strength: Models and methods. Symposium presentation, Progressing toward a shared set of methods and standards for developing and using measures of implementation fidelity. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Spring Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Test Commission. (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. R., Hammrich, P. L., Bloom, S., & Ragins, A. (2000). Language development and science inquiry: The Head Start on science and communication program. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 2(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S. H., Anthony, J. L., Swank, P. R., & Monseque-Bailey, P. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 448–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S. H., Assel, M., Gunnewig, S., & Swank, P. R. (2004). Center for improving the readiness of children for learning and education (CIRCLE) phonological awareness, language & literacy system. Houston: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S. H., Zucker, T. A., Solari, E. J., Crawford, A., & Williams, J. M. (2012). History, scale-up, and improvements of a statewide professional development program in Texas. In R. C. Pianta et al. (Eds.), Effective professional development in early childhood education (pp. 159–190). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, F. (2005). Helping your child learn science, with activities for children in preschool through grade 5. Revised. U.S. Department of Education. Downloaded from http://www.ed.gov/parents/academic/help/science/science.pdf

  • Maier, M. F., Greenfield, D. B., & Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J. (2013). Development and validation of a preschool teacher attitudes and beliefs towards science teaching questionnaire. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markwardt, F. C. (1997). Manual for the Peabody individual achievement test-revised: Normative update. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Education. (2001). Pre-Kindergarten through eighth standards: Science and technology/engineering. Malden: Massachusetts Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray, J. S., & Chen, J. Q. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge for preschool mathematics: Construct validity of a new teacher interview. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P., Fantuzzo, J., Waterman, C., Angelo, L., Warley, H., Gadsden, V., et al. (2009). Measuring preschool cognitive growth while it's still happening: The learning express. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 337–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWayne, C., Brenneman, K., Greenfield, D.B., Mistry, J., & Zan, B. (2012). Partnerships for early childhood curriculum development: Readiness through integrative science and engineering. NSF DRK-12 grant: DRL-1221065.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation programs. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements

  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2006). How has the English language learner population changed in the recent years? Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Research Council, & National Academy of Sciences. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality and teacher and student behavior. Elementary School Journal, 105, 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning: Kindergarten through eighth grade. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. (2009). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayfeld, I., Brenneman, K., & Gelman, R. (2011). Science in the classroom: Finding a balance between autonomous exploration and teacher-led instruction in preschool settings. Early Education and Development, 22, 970–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, P. (2008). Real science in preschool: Here, there and everywhere. Ypsilanti: HighScope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterlind, S. J. (2006). Modern measurement. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson Education . (2006). Early childhood observation system. San Antonio: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, R. D., & Camilli, G. (2007). Differential item functioning and item bias. In S. Sinharay & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Psychometrics, Vol. 26, pp. 125–167). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Book, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system™: Manual K-3. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. E., Taylor, K., & Taylor, S. (2004). Let’s talk science. Wings of discovery: A framework for early learning (2nd ed.). Toronto: GTK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, J., & Allalouf, A. (2003). Evaluating cross-lingual equating. International Journal of Testing, 3, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilitic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A., Magnuson, K., & Ou, S. (2006). PK-3 education: Programs and practices that work in children’s first decade. Foundation for Child Development Working Paper: Advancing PK-3 #6. New York: Foundation for Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, W. (2007). A head start on science: Encouraging a sense of wonder – 89 science activities for children ages 2–7. Arlington: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Science learning experiences in kindergarten and children’s growth in science performance in elementary grades. Education and Science, 38(167), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. M. (2009). Using children’s literature to teach standard-based science concepts in early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shillady, A. (2013). Spotlight on young children: Exploring science. Washington, DC: NAEYC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sireci, S. G. (1997). Problems and issues in linking assessments across languages. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(1), 12–19, 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Van Hemel, S. B. (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why, what and how. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson-Garcia, J., Brenneman, K., Frede, E., & Weber, M. (2010). Preschool rating instrument for science and mathematics (PRISM). New Brunswick: National Institute for Early Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takanishi, R. (2010). PreK-third grade: A paradigm shift. In V. Washington & J. D. Andrews (Eds.), Children in 2020: Creating a better tomorrow. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, T. (2006). Preschool science environment: What is available in a preschool classroom? Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). The Hispanic population: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/hispanic/

  • Van Egeren, L. A., Watson, D. P., & Morris, B. J. (2008, June). Head start on science: The impact of an early childhood science curriculum. Paper presented at the Ninth National Head Start Research Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1990). Introduction and history. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 1–21). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, S. P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, S. D., & Kimple, K. P. (2006). “How does your garden grow?” Teaching preschool children about the environment. Early Child Development and Care, 178(1), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III (WJ-III) tests of cognitive abilities. Rolling Meadows: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, K., & Winoker, J. (2013, January, February). The development of pre-K science, technology, and engineering standards. Presentation at a series of community forums for proposed preschool science, technology, and engineering (STE) standards sponsored by the Massachusetts State Government Office of Education. MA: various locations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., & Onchwari, J. A. (2006). Teaching young children science: Three key points. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, T. A., Monsegue-Bailey, P., Assel, M., Williams, J., Landry, S. H., & Crawford, A. (2013). Center for improving the readiness of children for learning and education (CIRCLE) phonological awareness, language & literacy system: Science and engineering subtest. Houston: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

    Daryl B. Greenfield

Authors
  1. Daryl B. Greenfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daryl B. Greenfield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

    Kathy Cabe Trundle

  2. Necatibey School of Education, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey

    Mesut Saçkes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenfield, D.B. (2015). Assessment in Early Childhood Science Education. In: Cabe Trundle, K., Saçkes, M. (eds) Research in Early Childhood Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9505-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation