Skip to main content

Promoting Practice-Based Innovation Through Learning at Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

This chapter defines the concepts of innovation and practice-based innovation and describes some key characteristics of practice-based knowledge and research-based knowledge and how these two types of knowledge can be integrated to facilitate creative learning and practice-based innovation. Creative learning is assumed to occur when individuals or groups in an organization question established thought and action patterns and break away from routinized, habitual procedures to develop new ways of handling the duties and tasks involved in a job. In this way, creative learning can be a driving force for change and innovation in organizations. Reflection in the workplace is proposed as a mechanism for facilitation of creative learning and practice-based innovation. Although the literature on reflection provides strong arguments in favour of such activities, empirical research has described many challenges to reflection in the workplace. Reflection is often not allotted formal priority on the management agenda. Yet the potential of reflection cannot be fully realized without formalizing reflection as an expected legitimized activity in the workplace.

This chapter is to a large extent based on an integration of arguments presented in three previously published texts: Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1–2), 27–40; Nilsen, P., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Fostering practice-based innovation through reflection at work. In: H. Melkas, & V. Harmakorpi (Eds.). Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications (pp. 155–172). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Nilsen, P., Nordström, G., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Integrating research-based and practice-based knowledge through workplace reflection. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(6). 403–415.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., Kwon, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2012). Explaining innovation at work: A socio-personal account. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Smith, R., & Barker, M. (2005). Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(3), 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilson, A. (2006). Rationalities, reflection and research. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 135–143). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (2006). Setting the scene for productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 3–10). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brante, T. (2010). Professional fields and truth regimes: In search of alternative approaches. Comparative Sociology, 9, 843–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1990). Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 177–193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2005). Predicting health behaviour. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defence mechanisms: Theory, research, and assessment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P., Boud, D., & Docherty, P. (2006). The emergence of productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 11–26). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus, A. (1992). The living company. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desforges, C. (2000). Putting educational research to use through knowledge transformation. Keynote lecture to the Further Education Research Network Conference, Coventry, 12 Dec 2000. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, P., Boud, D., & Cressey, P. (2006). Lessons and issues for practice and development. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 193–206). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopson, S., Locock, L., Gabbay, J., Ferlie, E., & Fitzgerald, L. (2005). Evidence-based health care and the implementation gap. In S. Dopson & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Knowledge to action? – Evidence-based health care in context (pp. 28–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & McKelvey, M. (2001). Innovation and employment: Process versus product innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Conceptual issues and critical conditions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2006a). The meaning and role of reflection in informal learning at work. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 43–53). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2006b). Two logics of learning. In E. Antonacopoulou, P. Jarvis, V. Andersen, B. Elkjær, & S. Høyrup (Eds.), Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning (pp. 33–49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2010a). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2010b). Organizational learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 47–52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2011). Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 105–119). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E., & Kock, H. (2009). Competence development in the workplace: Concepts, strategies, and effects. In K. Illeris (Ed.), International perspectives on competence development (pp. 34–54). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmholdt, C., & Brinkmann, S. (2006). Discursive practices at work – Constituting the reflective learner. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 170–180). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1988). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., & Waite, E. (2010). Stimulating the innovative potential of ‘routine’ workers through workplace learning. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(2), 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H., & Unwin, L. (2006). Improving workplace learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., Waite, E., & Kersh, N. (2011). Towards a social ecology of adult learning in and through the workplace. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 356–370). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. J. (2003). Professional growth plans: Possibilities and limitations of an organization-wide employee development strategy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row and Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., & Dopson, S. (2005). Knowledge, credible evidence, and utilization. In S. Dopson & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Knowledge to action? – Evidence-based health care in context (pp. 132–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology. A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, D. (2005). Knowledge management in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommen, L. (2000). Innovation and qualification: Institutional challenges (Working Paper, Tema T). Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 3–33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L., Beaumont, P., & Lee, M. (2002). Knowledge management practice in Scottish law firms. Human Resource Management, 12(2), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, H., & Ellström, P.-E. (2011). Formal and integrated strategies for competence development in SMEs. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. Boston: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge. Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (Eds.). (2006). How Europe’s economies learn. Coordinating competing models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., & Nielsen, P. (1999). Competition and transformation in the learning economy illustrated by the Danish case. Revue D’Économie Industrielle, 88(2), 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. (Ed.). (1964). Innovation in education. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. S. (2006). Psychology – Concepts and applications. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, P. (2010). Praktiknära innovationer genom integration av praktik- och forskningsbaserad kunskap. In P. Nilsen (Ed.), Implementation – teori och tillämpning i hälso- och sjukvård (pp. 125–144). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, P., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Fostering practice-based innovation through reflection at work. In H. Melkas & V. Harmakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 155–172). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, P., Nordström, G., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Integrating research-based and practice-based knowledge through workplace reflection. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(6), 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosière, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 491–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. E., & Rasmussen, J. (1989). The reflective expert and the prenovice. In L. Bainbridge & S. A. Ruiz Quintanilla (Eds.), Developing skills with information technology (pp. 9–33). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). The innovating organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, O. M., Boud, D., & Scheeres, H. (2012). Creating work: Employee-driven innovation through work practice reconstruction. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 77–91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, B. (2006). Reflection in action. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushmer, R., & Davies, H. T. O. (2004). Unlearning in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl II), ii10–ii15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949/2002). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkel, A. (2006). Disciplined reflection or communities of practice? In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 69–79). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner – How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1980). Theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Somerset: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, K. W., & Daudelin, M. W. (1999). The role of reflection in managerial learning. Westport: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevón, G. (1996). Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 49–67). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, A. B. R., & Docherty, P. (2003). Learning by design: Building sustainable organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strampel, K., & Oliver, R. (2007). Using technology to foster reflection in higher education. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007. Available from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/strampel.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2010.

  • Svensson, L., & Aagaard Nielsen, K. (2006). Action research and interactive research. In K. Aagaard Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive research. Beyond practice and theory (pp. 13–44). Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E., & Åberg, C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinder, L. (2006). A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice – A critical appraisal (pp. 212–241). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25, 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, E., Evans, K., & Kersh, N. (2012). Employee-driven innovation amongst ‘routine’ employees in the UK. The role of organizational ‘strategies’ and individual ‘tactics’. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 149–166). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per-Erik Ellström .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellström, PE., Nilsen, P. (2014). Promoting Practice-Based Innovation Through Learning at Work. In: Billett, S., Harteis, C., Gruber, H. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics