Skip to main content

Taxonomy and Systematics

  • Chapter
Entomology

Abstract

Systematics may be defined as the study of the kinds and diversity of organisms and the relationships among them. Taxonomy, on the other hand, is the theory and practice of identifying, describing, naming, and classifying organisms. Classification is the arrangement of organisms into groups (taxa, singular taxon) on the basis of their relationships. It follows that identification can take place only after a classification has been established. It should be emphasized that these definitions are not adopted by all authors. Taxonomy is often used as a synonym of systematics (as defined above), while classification is sometimes used rather loosely (and incorrectly) as a synonym of identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Bishop, A. L., Holtkamp, R. H., Waterhouse, D. B., and Lowes, D., 1989, PESTKEY: An expert system based key for identification of the pests and beneficial arthropods in lucerne, Gen. Appl. Entomol. 21: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börner, C., 1904, Zur Systematik der Hexapoda, Zool. Anz. 27: 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, H. B., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny, with Special Reference to Insects, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brues, C. T., Melander, A. L., and Carpenter, F. M., 1954, Classification of Insects, 2nd ed., Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, J. H., 1918, The Wings of Insects, Comstock, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, G. C., 1915, The thoracic sclerites and the systematic position of Grylloblatta campodeiformis Walker, a remarkable annectant orthopteroid insect, Entomol. News 26: 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, G. C., 1920, Some anatomical details of the remarkable winged zorapteran, Zorotypus hubbardi Caudell, with notes on its relationships, Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 22: 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, G. C., 1922, Evidences of relationship indicated by the venation of the fore wings of certain insects with especial reference to the Hemiptera-Homoptera, Psyche 29: 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, G. C., 1924, The phylogeny and classification of insects, Pomona J. Entomol. Zool. 16:33–47. Cranston, P. S., Gullan, P. J., and Taylor, R. W., 1991, Principles and practice of systematics, in: The Insects of Australia, 2nd ed., Vol. I (CSIRO, ed.), Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto, H. E., 1982, Animal Taxonomy, Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlirsch, A., 1903, Zur Phylogenie der Hexapoden, Sitz. Nat. Klasse Acad. Wis.s. 112: 716–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlirsch, A., 1906–1908, Die fossilen Insecten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen,Engelman, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlirsch, A., 1925, Geschichte, Litteratur, Technik, Paläontologie, Phylogenie und Systematik der Insecten, in: Handbuch der Entomologie ( C. Schröder, ed.), Vol. 3, pp. 1–1201, Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1965, Phylogenetic systematics, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10: 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1981, Insect Phylogeny, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, H. E., 1958, The phylogeny of the panorpoid orders, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 3: 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, H. E., 1981, Biology of Insect Eggs, 3 volumes, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, N. P., 1981, Phylogeny of insect orders, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26: 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, N. P., 1989, Insect phylogeny based on morphological evidence, in: The Hierarchy of Life ( B. Fernholm, K. Bremer, and H. Jörnvall, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, N. P., 1991, Phylogeny of extant hexapods, in: The Insects of Australia, 2nd ed., Vol. l (CSIRO, ed.), Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukalovâ-Peck, J., 1985, Ephemeroid wing venation based upon new gigantic Carboniferous mayflies and basic morphology, phylogeny, and metamorphosis of pterygote insects (Insecta, Ephemerida), Can. J. Zool. 63: 933–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukalovâ-Peck, J., 1987, New Carboniferous Diplura, Monura, and Thysanura, the hexapod ground plan, and the role of thoracic side lobes in the origin of wings (Insecta), Can J. Zool. 65: 2327–2345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukalovâ-Peck, J., 1991, Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures, in: The Insects of Australia, 2nd ed., Vol. I (CSIRO, ed.), Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. F., Hastings, A. M., Dallwitz, M. J., and Paine, T. A., 1993, Beetle Larvae of the World: Interactive Identification and Information Retrieval fier Families and Subfamilies. CD-ROM, Version 1.0 for MS-DOS, CSIRO, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martynov, A. V., 1924, The interpretation of the wing venation and tracheation of the Odonata and Agnatha, Russ. Ent. Obozr. 18: 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martynov, A. V., 1924, Original in Russian. Translated, with an introductory note, by F. M. Carpenter in Psyche 37 (1930): 245–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1969, Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1981, Biological classification: Toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies, Science 214: 510–516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, R. E., 1985, Larval characteristics of Cactoblastis spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the selection of species for biological control of prickly pears (Opuntia spp.), Bull. Entomol. Res. 75: 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D., 1970, Diverse approaches to systematics, Evol. Biol. 4: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentz, D. C. F., 1993, A Monograph of the Tettigoniidae of Australia, Vol. 2 ( The Austrosaginae, Zaprochilinae and Phasmodinae), CSIRO, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. H., 1974, Biological Systematics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A. G., 1966, Basic Arthropodan Stock, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, D., 1899, Some points in the classification of the Insecta Hexapoda, Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Zool., pp. 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R., 1973, Numerical Taxonomy-The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A., 1963, Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, R. J., 1918–1920. The panorpoid complex. A study of the holometabolous insects with special reference to the sub-classes Panorpoidea and Neuropteroidea, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 43:265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, R. J., 1918–1920. The panorpoid complex. A study of the holometabolous insects with special reference to the sub-classes Panorpoidea and Neuropteroidea, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 43:395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, R. J., 1918–1920. The panorpoid complex. A study of the holometabolous insects with special reference to the sub-classes Panorpoidea and Neuropteroidea, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 43:626–657;

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, R. J., 1918–1920. The panorpoid complex. A study of the holometabolous insects with special reference to the sub-classes Panorpoidea and Neuropteroidea, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 44:533–718;

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, R. J., 1918–1920. The panorpoid complex. A study of the holometabolous insects with special reference to the sub-classes Panorpoidea and Neuropteroidea, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 45:214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. H., Jr., 1969, The construction of a classification, in: Systematic Biology, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., Publ. No. 1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. A. L., Theischinger, G., and Abbey, H. M., 1991, The Australian Dragonflies, CSIRO, Melbourne. Wilson, H. F., and Doner, M. H., 1937, The Historical Development of Insect Classification, Madison, Wi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gillott, C. (1995). Taxonomy and Systematics. In: Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4380-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4380-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44967-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4380-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics