Abstract
Cultural-historical activity theory (Cole & Engeström, 1993; Engeström, Miettinen & Punamäki, 1999; Leont’ev, 1978) places decision making in the context of object-oriented, collective and artifact-mediated activity systems constantly undergoing developmental transformations. Decisions are not made alone, they are indirectly or directly influenced by other participants of the activity. Decisions are typically steps in a temporally distributed chain of interconnected events. Decisions are not purely technical, they have moral and ideological underpinnings with regard to responsibility and power. And the content of decisions is not restricted to the ostensible problem or task at hand; they always also shape the future of the broader activity system within which they are made.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barrett, F. J. (1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9, 605–622.
Cole, M. and Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Doubilet, P. and McNeil, B. J. (1988). Clinical decisionmaking. In J. Dowie and A. Elstein (Eds.), Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studie.s in distributed working intelligence. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education (Research Bulletin 83 ).
Engeström, Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration is medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7, 395–412.
Engeström, Y. (1996). Interobjectivity, ideality, and dialectics. Mind, Culture and Activity, 2, 192–215.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard and U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.), (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Firth, A. (1995). Introduction and overview. In A. Firth (Ed.), ’The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
Freidson, E. (1989). Medical work in America: Es.say.s on health care. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Friend, J. (1993). Searching for appropriate theory and practice in multi-organizational fields. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 585–598.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Klein, G., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R. and Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood: Ablex.
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A. and King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.
Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition. Moscow: Progress.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
March, J. G. (1999). The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mehan, H. (1984). Institutional decision-making. In B. Rogoff and J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, L. L. (1994). Challenging the assumptions of traditional approaches to negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 10, 337–346.
Strauss, A. L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Strauss, A. L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B. and Wiener, C. (1985). The social organization of medical work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sen.semaking in organizations. London: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555.
Zsambok, C. E. (1997). Naturalistic decision making: Where are we now? In C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision snaking. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbautn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Engeström, Y. (2001). Making Expansive Decisions: An Activity-Theoretical Study of Practitioners Building Collaborative Medical Care for Children. In: Allwood, C.M., Selart, M. (eds) Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5671-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9827-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive