Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 46))

Abstract

Learning enables change, and it is becoming a necessary part of everyone’s job. Today’s work force must be able to adapt quickly to new business directions and ways of working, to new information, and to new projects and work groups. Timely action can make the difference between success and failure in bringing new products and services to market. To stimulate learning and motivate needed changes, corporations have invested in training programs that are designed to impact both organizational and individual performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Applied Global University. (1996). Santa Clara, CA: Applied Materials, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1987). Achieving results from training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1989). Using evaluation to transform training. In R. O. Brinkerhoff (ed.), Evaluating training programs in business and industry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O., & Gill, S. J. (1994). The learning alliance: Systems thinking in human resource development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1997). Clarifying and directing impact evaluation. In S. M. Brown & C. J. Seidner (eds.), Evaluating corporate training: Models and issues. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. D. (1993). Competency-based performance improvement: A strategy for organizational change. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, S. (1997). Assessing people’s competencies. In S. M. Brown & C. J. Seidner (eds.), Evaluating corporate training: Models and issues. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayeski, D. M. (1996). From “training department” to “learning organization.” Performance Improvement. 35(7), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherson, D. J., & Moore, C. A. (1987). The role of training in implementing strategic change. In L. S. May, C. A. Moore, & S. J. Zammit (eds.), Evaluating business and industry training. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. J. (1989). Using evaluation to build commitment to training. In R. O. Brinkerhoff (ed.), Evaluating training programs in business and industry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. M., Stein, B. A., & Jick, D. J. (1992). The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience and leaders guide it. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 70(1), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996a). The balanced scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996b). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, D. T., & Nadler, D. A. (1992). Prophets in the dark: How Xerox reinvented itself and beat back the Japanese. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, J. C. (1994). Corporate quality universities. Lessons in building a world-class work force. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. (1994). How the right measures help teams excel. Harvard Business Review. 72(3), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, L., & Mailin, P. (1996). Evaluation practices of instructional designers and organizational supports and barriers. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 9(4), 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (1997). Level 4 and beyond: An ROI model. In S. M. Brown & C. J Seidner (eds.), Evaluating corporate training: Models and issues. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1995). Performance consulting: Moving beyond training. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1995, June). Building learning organizations through partnerships between HR and line leadership. Keynote speech presented at the Assessment. Measurement and Evaluation of Human Performance Conference. Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, and D. L. Stufflebeam. Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touger, H. E. (1997). Impact of technology on training evaluation. In S. M. Brown & C. J. Seidner (eds.), Evaluating corporate training: Models and issues. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggenhorn, W. (1990). Motorola U: When training becomes an education. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moore, C.A., Seidner, C.J. (1998). Organizational Strategy and Training Evaluation. In: Brown, S.M., Seidner, C.J. (eds) Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6031-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4850-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics