Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 8))

Abstract

During the 1990s, large-scale reform efforts intensified as a strategy to implement educational innovations (Fullan, 2000). Evaluations of innovation efforts from past decades have made clear that these reforms have produced unsatisfactory results in many cases. In particular, we can conclude from this literature that changes in teaching practice are extremely difficult to accomplish. Within this context of intensifying educational reforms, it is important to examine the organizational potential for innovation and capacity of schools to realize large- scale innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacharach, S.B., & Mundell, B. (1995). Images of schools. Structures and roles in organizational behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, R, Conley, S.C., & Bauer, S. (1990). The dimensionality of decision participation in educational organizations: The value of a multi-domain evaluative approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 126–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes, I., de Brabander, C, & Imants, J. (1999). Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 166–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, R.J., Creemers, B.P.M., & Stringfield, S. (Eds.) (1999). Enhancing educational excellence, equity and efficiency: Evidence from evaluation of systems and schools in change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bycio, R, Allen, J.S., & Hackett, R.D. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. (1995). De professionele ontwikkeling van leerkrachten basisonderwijs [The professional development of teachers in primary education] (Dissertation). Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M., Sleegers, R, & Vandenberghe, R. (1995). Professionaliteit van docenten en betrokkenheid [Teacher professionality and concerns]. In R. van den Berg & R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), Wegen van betrokkenheid: Reflecties op onderwijsvernieuwing [Ways of concerns: Reflections on educational innovation] (pp. 190–208). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers’ professional development: a solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 70 (5), 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, E, Yammarino, F.J., & Markham, S.E. (1995). Leadership: The multi-level approaches. Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M.W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202–218). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolaard, S. (1999). Schools in change or schools in chains (Dissertation). Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R.F., Peterson, RL., & McCarthey, S.J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (Ed.) (1993). Emotion in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M.E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York-Toronto: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of educational reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.) (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F, Sleegers, R, Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002, April). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, E, Sleegers, R, & van den Berg, R. (1999). Transformational leadership and the implementation of large-scale innovation programs. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F, Sleegers, R, van den Berg, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37 (1), 130–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, E, Sleegers, R, Voeten, R., & van den Berg (2002, April). The implementation of educational innovation: Understanding the contributions of schools and teachers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, E, van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). The innovative capacity of schools in primary education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103, 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, Th.R. (1995). Professional development in education: In search of the optimal mix. In Th.R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: Newparadigms & practices (pp. 114–132). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, Th.R., & Huberman, M. (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E., & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools. Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. & Heek, R. (1996). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), International handbook of research in educational leadership and administration (pp. 723–784). Netherlands: Kluwer Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, R, & Heek, R. (2002). What do you call people with visions? Vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), International handbook of research on educational leadership and administration (2nd Edition). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 558–575). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality. collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teacher and Teaching Education, 6(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (1994). The new professionalism: the synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooge, E.H. (1998). Ruimte voor beleid. Autonomievergroting en beleidsuitvoering door basisscholen [Space for policy. Increase of autonomy and policymaking by primary schools] (Dissertation). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam/SCO-Kohnstamm Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., & Gray, J. (1999). Moving on and moving up: Confronting the complexities of school improvement in the Improving Schools Project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5 (1), 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtveen, A.A.M., Booij, N., Jong, R., de, & van den Grift, WJ.C.M. (1999). Adaptive Instruction and Pupil Achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2) 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imants, J., Tillema, H.H., & de Brabander, C.J. (1993). A dynamic view of teachers learning and school improvement. In F.K. Kieviet, & R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), School culture, school improvement and teacher development (pp. 109–128). Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongmans, K., Biemans, H., Sleegers, P, & de Jong, F. (1999, May). Participatie van docenten in het onderwijskundig beleid van de school en hun instructiegedrag [Teacher participation within the school’ educational policy making and their instructional behavior]. Paper presented at the Education Research Days (ORD), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives. From career stories to teachers’ professional development. Teacher and Teacher Education, 9(5/6), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempas, G., Wahl, D., & Huber, G.L. (1995, June). Adapting teacher training for the promotion of active learning to teachers’ tolerance of uncertainty. Paperpresented at the 6th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S.A., & Locke, E.A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K.J., Dansereau, F, & Hall, R.J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and anaiysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, S.D., & Louis, K.S. (1997). Teacher teaming in middle schools: Dilemmas for a schoolwide community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (1999). Leren van docenten tijdens de beroepsloopbaan: Studies naar professionaliteit op de werkplek in het voortgezet onderwijs [The learning of teachers during their professional career: Studies of professionality on the job in secondary education] (Dissertation). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (2000, April). Schools as places for teachers to learn? Opportunities for professional development in Dutch educational reform. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerweij, N.A.J., & Haak, E. (1994). Eerst goed kijken.… De dynamiek van scholen-in-ontwikkeling [First have a good look.… The dynamics of schools-in-development]. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (Ed.) (2000). Understanding schools as intelligent systerns (Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, vol. 4). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teachers sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 679–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharrat, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Louis, K.S. (Eds.) (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, Ph. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 785–840). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1999). What is educational administration, anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 546–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15,129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S. (1994). Beyond ‘managed change’: rethinking how schools improve. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S. (1998). Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., & Marks, H.M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 10(7), 532–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., Marks, H.M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33 (4), 757–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., & Miles, M.B. (1990). Improving the urban high school. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., Toole, J., & Hargreaves, A. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In J. Murphy, & K.S. Louis, (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration, 2nd ed. (pp. 251–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, F, Vandenberghe, R., & Ghesquière, P. (1999). The imperative of complementary between the school level and the classroom level in educational innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 661–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H.M., & Louis, K.S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academie achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H.M., Louis, K.S., & Printy, S.M. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, vol. 4) (pp. 239–267). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M.W., & Oberman, I. (Eds.) (1996). Teacher learning: New policies, new practices. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D.H. (1989). The education production function: lts evolving role in policy analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(1), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muiford, B. (1998). Organizational learning and educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 616–641). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: the emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Ch. (1972). Complex organizations: a critical essay. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters-Sips, M., & Zwarts, M. (1999). Onderwijsleerproces basisvorming. Evaluatierappport. [The primary process in the core curriculum. Report of evaluation.] Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectorate of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reezigt, G.J., Guldemond, H., & Creemers, B.P.M. (1999). Empirical validity for a comprehensive model on educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Creemers, B.P.M., Bollen, B., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L., & Lagerweij, N. (Eds.) (1996). Making good schools, linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Teddlie, Ch., Hopkins, D., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. In Ch. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 206–231). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.M., & Schneider, G.T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980–1991. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, J.S., Short, P.M., Short, R.J., & Eckley, M. (1998). Teacher empowerment and principal leadership: Understanding the influence process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34,630–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, E., & Terwei, J. (1999). Constructivism and authentic pedagogy: state of the art and recent developments in the Dutch national curriculum in secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, SJ. (1987). Educational reform strategies: Will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 95, 534–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S.J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace. The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. Cadzen (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 16, 353–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1995). The organizational design of schools. In S.B. Bacharach & B. Mundell (Eds.), Images of schools. Structures and roles in organizational behavior (pp. 11–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S.W, & Kang, S.J. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99, 238–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday, Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, H. (1997). Developing new traditions in secondary schools: A working model for organizational and instructional change. Teachers College Records, 4, 549–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57,1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H.C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H.C, Muiford, B., Zarins, S., & Bishop, P. (2000). Leadership for organizational learning in Australian secondary schools. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, vol 4) (pp. 267–292). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1996). Education for all. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, P.J.C. (1991). School en beleidsvoering: Een onderzoek naar de relatie tussen het beleidsvoerend vermogen van scholen en het benutten van de beleidsruimte door scholen [Schools and policy making: A study into the relation between policy making capacity of schools and the use of policy space by schools] (Dissertation). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, P.J.C. (1999). Professional identity, school reform, and burnout: Some reflections on teacher burnout. In R. Vandenberghe & M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout. A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 247–255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, R, Bergen, Th., & Giesbers, J. (1994). The policy-making capacity of schools: Results of a Dutch study. Educational Management & Administration, 22(3), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, R, van den Berg, R., & Geijsel, F. (1997, April). The innovative capacity of schools and collaboration between teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, R, van den Berg, R., & Geijsel, F. (2000). Building new innovative schools: the need for new approaches. Essay review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, P.J.C., & Wesselingh, A. (1995). Dutch dilemmas: decentralisation, school autonomy and professionalisation of teachers. Educational Review, 47(2), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M.A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 20, 129–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M.A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M.A., & Hart, A.W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy, & K.S. Louis, (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration, 2nd ed. (pp. 297–322). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M.A., Lazarus, V, & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1996). Instructional outcomes of school-based participative decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R.M., & Short, J.C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation and cognition. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour (pp. 379–403). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S. (1995). Attempting to enhance students’ learning through innovative programs: The case for schools evolving into High Reliability Organizations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, Ch., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.) (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teelken, J.C. (1995). Autonomieverschuivingen in het voortgezet onderwijs [Shift in autonomy of schools for secondary education]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsrecht en Onderwijsbeleid [Dutch Journal for Educational Right and Policy], special issue, June, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H.S., & Robinson, V.M.J. (1998). Collegiality in schools: lts nature and implications for problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 608–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, K.T., & Cheng, Y.C. (1999). School organizational healthand teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R. (1992). Transformational education policy: Schools as strategie organization. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 13(4), 440–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R. (1993). The Concerns-Based Adoption Model in the Netherlands, Flanders and the United Kingdom: state of the art and perspective studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., & Ros, A. (1999). The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 879–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1996a). Building innovative capacity and leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, Ph. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–699). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1996b). The innovative capacity of schools in secondary education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., Sleegers, R, Geijsel, F, & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementing of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., & Vandenberghe, R. (Eds.) (1995). Wegen van betrokkenheid: Reflecties op onderwijsvernieuwing [Ways of concerns: Reflections on educational innovation]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., & Vandenberghe, R. (1999). Succesvol leiding geven aan onderwijsinnovaties. Investeren in mensen [Leading educational innovations successfully: investing in people]. Alphen aan de Rijn, The Netherlands: Samsom.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., Vandenberghe, R., & Sleegers, R (1999). Management of innovations from a cultural-individual perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(3), 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2001, April). How does it feel? Teachers’ orientations, appraisals and emotions in a context of change. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, K., Sleegers, Th., Bergen., & Klaassen, C. (2001). Professional orientations of secondary school teachers towards their work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17,175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers, W. (1999). Het Studiehuis in de knel. Zelfstandigheid en controle van scholen, docenten en leerlingen. [The study house in a jam. Independence and control of schools, teachers, and pupils.] Meso, 19(107), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J., Tulviste, R, & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In A. Forman, N. Minick & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 336–357). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, R (1999). Intensification and stress in teaching. In R. Vandenberghe and A.M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 115–139). Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., Van den Berg, R. (2002). Conditions Fostering Educational Change. In: Leithwood, K., et al. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3920-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0375-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics