Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 18))

  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Earlier in this Conference, Cooley indicated that to consider data analysis apart from the research questions being asked is very difficult. Certainly, throughout the course of the Conference, it was evident that analysis in and of itself was rarely criticized or even discussed — even when it was the assigned topic. Instead, criticism was addressed to the content of the research questions. Such an occurrence seems quite natural to me, for I have always sensed a certain amount of symbiosis between the research questions asked and the data-analysis methods used to answer them. Each seems to stimulate the other to new heights: as the questions become more comprehensive and complicated, new techniques are developed to answer them; and likewise, new developments in measurement and observational techniques allow new questions to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bergan, J.R. (1983). “Latent class models in educational research.” Review of Research in Education, 10, 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Hyman, J.S. (1979). “How come so many hypotheses in educational research are supported?” Educational Researcher, 8 (11), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W.W. and Lohnes, P.R. (1976). Evaluation research in education. New York: Irvington Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E.W. (1981). “On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research.” Educational Researcher, 10 (4), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltovich, P.J. (1983). “Expertise: Reorganizing and refining knowledge for use.” Professions Education Researcher Notes, 4 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle, C.O. (1980). Continuing learning in the professions. San Francisco: JosseyBass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L.M. (1980). “On why many hypotheses in educational research are supported and on the interpretation of sample effect sizes: A comment.” Educational Researcher, 9 (5), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G., and Sorbom, D. (1979). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R. (1969). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, G. (1981). “On the interpretation of classroom observations.” Educational Researcher, 10 (5), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, D. (1983). “The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature.” Review of Educational Research, 53 (1), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, C.W., Jr. (1978). Time series analysis: Regression techniques. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.C. (1981). “Toward an evaluation of the experiment in educational contexts.” Educational Researcher, 10 (6), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poister, T.H. (1982). “Performance monitoring in the evaluation process.” Evaluation Review, 6 (5), 601–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. and Yeaton, W.H. (1982). “Magnitudes of experimental effects in social science research.” Evaluation Review, 6 (5), 579–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1981). “Disciplines of inquiry in education: An overview.” Educational Researcher, 10 (6), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, R.E. and Wolfe, R.G. (1981). “Latent trait theories and the assessment of educational achievement.” Review of Research in Education, 9, 377–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1982). “When do instructional methods make a difference.” Educa-tional Researcher, 11 (4), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, P.F. and Hoaglin, D. (1981). Applications, basics, and computing of exploratory data analysis. Boston, Massachusetts: PWS Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D. and Stone, M.H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, Illinois: Mesa Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffman, K.I. (1985). Another View of Data Analysis. In: Abrahamson, S. (eds) Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8707-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4986-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics