Skip to main content

Biogas Production from Water Hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms

  • Chapter
Perspectives in Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology

Abstract

The suitability of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) for biogas production has been tested under mesophilic conditions, in 90-day laboratory-scale experiments. In almost all trials, anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth followed a balanced course producing good quality gas. Among three start-up inoculum sources,viz., rumen liquor, digested sewage sludge, and digested water hyacinth sludge from an old biogas digester, the latter has been found to be the best. Total solids concentrations of 20 to 50 g/1 were successfully applied. Increasing the loading rate within the range from 0.597 to 4.0 kg VS/M3/day resulted in a decrease in gas yields per unit weight of the feed. No harmful accumulation of volatile fatty acids occurred in any experiment. pH levels settled around 7.0 without the need for external adjustment. Digestion at the constant temperatures of 25, 37 and 45°C showed 37°C to be the best incubation temperature. Room temperature varying between 32 and 42°C gave higher yields than 25 and 45°C. Gas production at 45°C was very sensitive to any environmental changes. An average of 630 1 of biogas was obtained per kg of total solids of water hyacinth. Methane percentages in the gas produced ranged from 54 to 63% in the steady state of batch and semi-continuous fermentations. In some cases methane percentage rose to above 70%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1975)Official Methods of Analysis. 12th Ed. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badger, D.M., Bogue, M.J., and Stewart, D.J. (1970) Biogas production from crops and organic wastes. I. Results of batch digestion. New Zealand J. Sci., 22: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, H.A. (1956) Bacterial Fermentations. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Tigani, K.B. (1975) Control of water hyacinth in the Sudan. In: Obeid, M. (ed.), Aquatic Weeds in the Sudan with Special Reference to the Water Hyacinth. National Council for Research, Sudan, pp. 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, W.F. (1975) Certain aspects of anaerobic digestion of waste solids in the thermophilic range at the Hyperion Treatment Plant. IAWPR Workshop on Design - Operation interactions at large waste water treatment plants. Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratch, H. (1965) Water hyacinth - a menace that could be turned to a blessing. In: Little, E.C.S. (ed.), Handbook of Utilization of Aquatic Plants. 1968. FAO, Rome. pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, A.G., Varel, V.H. and Chen, Y.R. (1981) Ultimate methane yield from beef cattle manure. Effect of temperature, ration constituents, antibiotics and manure age. Agric. Wastes, 3: 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E.T. and Ahmed, S.H. (1964) Water hyacinth control in the Nile River. Sudan Publ. Inf. Proc. Centre, Dept. Agric., Khartoum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V. and Herberger, J.P. (1977) The World’s Worst Weeds - Distribution and Biology. University Press of Hawaii, pp. 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, N.S. and Bashir, M.O. (1982) Introduction of some natural enemies of water hyacinth to the White Nile, Sudan. Trop. Pest Manage., 28: 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, A. (1948) Microbiological decomposition of water hyacinth. Soil Science, 66: 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laura, R.D. and Idnani, M.A. (1971) Increased production of biogas from cow dung by adding other agricultural waste materials. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 22: 164–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavkulich, L.M. (1978) Soil organic matter (titrametric method). Walkley - Black Method. Dept. of Soil Sci. Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T IWS. pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettinga, G. (1979) Direct anaerobic treatment handles waste effectively. Ind. Wastes., 25: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, E.C.S. (ed.) (1968) Handbook of Utilization of Aquatic Plants. FAO Publication, PL CPV 20, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccarty, P.L. (1964) Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals. III. Toxic materials and their control. Public works, 95: 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, O., El Amin, H.B. and Leffler, V. (1978) Some aspects on the utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as supplementary control method in the Sudan. Symp - on Crop Pest Management. Khartoum (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, O., Koch, W. and Koser, H. (1983) Utilization and Control of Water Hyacinth in Sudan. German Agency for Technical Cooperation ( GTZ ). Eschborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, N.W. (1960) Water hyacinth: a curse or a crop? Nature, 185: 116–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K.R. and Debusk, W.F. (1984) Growth characteristics of aquatic macrophytes cultured in nutrient - enriched water. I. Water hyacinth, water lettuce, and pennywort. Econ. Botany, 38: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taiganides, E.P. (1979) Wastes are resources out of place. Agric. Wastes, 1: 1 - 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velson, A.F.M. Van. (1977) Anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. I. The influence of detention time and manure concentration. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 25: 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velson, A.F.M. Van. (1979) Anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. II. Start - up procedure. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 27: 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widyanto, J., Kasno, S., Thohari, M., Wirjahardjy, S., and Utomo, I.H. (1979) Prospects of some industrial and semi-industrial uses of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms). Proc. 2nd. Sem. Aquatic Manag. in Rawa Pening, Saltiga, Java.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B.C., McDonald, R.C., and Gordon, J. (1975) Bioconversion of water hyacinth into methane gas. Part I. NASA Tech. Memo., TM-X-72725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B.C., and McDonald, R.C., (1976) Don’t waste water weeds. New Sci., 71: 318–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder, A.J.B. (1982) Biological methane formation. The Third Regional Training Course of the Egyptian Society of Applied Microbiology on Prospectives of Technologies and Techniques of Applied Microbiology and Waste Recycling. Cairo, Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Elsevier Applied Science Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dirar, H.A., El Amin, H.B. (1986). Biogas Production from Water Hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. In: Alani, D.I., Moo-Young, M. (eds) Perspectives in Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4321-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4321-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8420-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4321-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics