Skip to main content

Contingent Valuation Design and Results: Option Price and Use Values

  • Chapter
Measuring Water Quality Benefits

Part of the book series: International Series in Economic Modeling ((INSEM,volume 3))

  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, economists have assessed the state of art in contingent valuation. While this assessment has answered some questions, it has identified new ones. This chapter highlights our interpretation of the key contingent valuation issues. This interpretation is important for understanding the motives behind the development of our survey questionnaire. It also provides additional perspective for the empirical results that also are presented in this chapter. Before describing the empirical results, we discuss a technique for identifying influential observations in the survey data, which is becoming an important empirical issue in contingent valuation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aizen, I., and M. Fishbien, 1977, “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 84, 1977, pp. 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth, 1986, Untitled Review Comments, in Ronald G. Cummings, David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze, eds., Valuing Public Goods; The Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, David A., Edwin Kuh, and Roy E. Welsch, 1980, Regression Diagnostics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Richard C., and Thomas A. Heberlein, 1980, “Simulated Markets, Hypothetical Markets, and Travel Cost Analysis: Alternative Methods of Estimating Outdoor Recreation Demand,” Report No. 187, December 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Richard C., and Thomas A. Heberlein, 1986, “Does Contingent Valuation Work?" in Ronald G. Cummings, David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze, eds., Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allenheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, Charles, Daniel Primont, R. Robert Russell, 1978, Quality, Separability, and Functional Structure: Theory and Economic Applications, New York: North Holland, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Kevin J., and Richard C. Bishop, 1984, “A Comparison of Contingent Valuation Techniques,” unpublished paper, Wisconsin University, July 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Kevin J., and Richard C. Bishop, 1985, “The Total Value of Wildlife Resources: Conceptual and Empirical Issues,” paper presented at AERE Workshop on Recreation Demand Modeling, Boulder, Colorado, May 17–18, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, David S., Ronald G. Cummings, Morteza Rahmatian, William D. Schulze, and Mark A. Thayer, 1982, Experimental Approaches for Valuing Environmental Commodities, draft report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, David S., Berry Ives, and William D. Schulze, 1976, “The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, December 1976, pp. 325–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Richard T., Gary L. Casterline, and Robert Cameron Mitchell, 1984, “A Note on Testing and Correcting for Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys,” Discussion Paper D-116, Quality of the Environment Division Resources for the Future, January 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. Dennis, and Sanford Weisberg, 1982, Residuals and Influence in Regression, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Ronald G., David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze, 1986, Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert, John T., and Robert A. Young, 1981, “Recreational Demands for Maintaining Instream Flows: A Contingent Valuation Approach,"– American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 63, November 1981, pp. 666–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, William H., V. Kerry Smith, and Matthew Mivney, 1983, A Comparison of Alternative Approaches for Estimating Recreation and Related Benefits of Water Quality Improvements, Environmental Benefits Analysis Series, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, B., and T. L. Goodale, 1973, “Water Quality Perceptions and the Recreational Users of Green Bay,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, June 1973, pp. 569–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, and Louis A. Cox. Jr., 1984, “Conceptual Framework for Regulatory Benefits Assessment,” Chapter 4, in Evaluation of the State of the Art in Benefits Assessment Methods for Public Policy Purposes, Report to the National Science Foundation, Boston: Arthur D. Little, Inc., December 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenley, Douglas A., Richard G. Walsh, and Robert A. Young, 1981, “Option Value: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, No. 4, November 1981, pp. 657–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael, 1984, “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, August 1984, pp. 332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael, 1985, “Statistical Issues in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation Studies,” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, April 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, Thomas J., and Douglas A. Rae, 1985, “Valuing Diesel Odor Reductions: Results from Philadelphia Survey,” unpublished paper, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert Cameron, and Richard T. Carson, 1981, An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements, draft report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington, D.C., June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert C., and Richard T. Carson, 1984, Willingness to Pay for National Freshwater Quality Improvements, draft report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future, October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Douglas A., 1981a, Visibility Impairment at Mesa Verde National Park: An Analysis of Benefits and Costs of Controlling Emissions ÍJ2 the Four Corners Area, prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute, Charles River Associates, Boston, Massachusetts, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Douglas A., 1981b, Benefits of Improving Visibility at Great Smoky National Park, draft report prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, Charles River Associates, Boston, Massachusetts, December 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Alan, 1986, “The Possibility of Satisfactory Benefit Estimation with Contingent Markets,” in Ronald G. Cummings, David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze, eds., Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allenheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Alan, John P. Hoehn, and George S. Tolley, 1981, “The Structure of Contingent Markets: Some Results of a Recent Experiment,” paper presented at the American Economic Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Alan, Berry Ives, and Clyde Eastman, 1974, “Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 1, 1974, pp. 132–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raucher, Robert L., and Ann Fisher, 1982, “Measuring the Recreation Benefits of Improved Water Quality: A Comparison of Alternative Methods,” paper presented at the Southern Economic Association meetings, Atlanta, Georgia, November 10–12, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Robert D., Ralph C. D’arge, and David S. Brookshire, 1980, “An Experiment on the Economic Value of Visibility,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, March pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul, 1954, “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, 1954, pp. 387–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seller, Christine, John R. Stoll, and Jean-Paul Chavas, 1985, “Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques,” Land Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2, May 1985, pp. 156–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. Kerry, 1975, “A Simulation Analysis of the Power of Several Tests for Detecting Heavy-Tailed Distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, September 1975, pp. 662–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. Kerry, 1985, “Some Issues in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation Studies,” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, April 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, and A. Myrick Freeman III, 1985, Valuing Changes in Hazardous Waste Risks: A Contingent Valuation Analysis, draft interim report, prepared for the Economic Analysis Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under Cooperative Agreement No. CR-811075, prepared by Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, and Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, February 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman, 1981, “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, Vol. 211, January 30, pp. 453–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, 1982, 1980 Census of the Population and Housing, preliminary data tape, Washington, D.C., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, William J., 1981, “The Water Quality Ladder,” Appendix II in Robert Cameron Mitchell and Richard T. Carson, An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements, draft report. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, V.K., Desvousges, W.H. (1986). Contingent Valuation Design and Results: Option Price and Use Values. In: Measuring Water Quality Benefits. International Series in Economic Modeling, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4223-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4223-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8374-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4223-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics