Skip to main content

Prior knowledge and risk communication: The case of nuclear radiation and X-rays

  • Chapter
Communicating Risks to the Public

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 4))

Abstract

Modern industrial and technological developments have been accompanied by different types of hazards and threats. Not surprisingly, there has been a growing interest during the last two decades in risk and risk perception. Corresponding to the growing concern regarding potential hazards, there have been increasing efforts in developing programs to inform the public about the risks and possible consequences involved in certain hazardous enterprises. Attempts to create effective risk-information programs serve several purposes: First, in a democratic society decisions (made by societal decision makers) have to be justified. It is assumed that the more the public knows, the better it can evaluate (and eventually participate in) the decision process (Baram, 1986). Second, more information regarding a potential hazard may increase the perceived control (Brehmer, 1985) and thus mitigate undesirable effects such as excessive fear, thus leading to more rational decisions. Finally, understanding the processes underlying potential hazards and knowing the possible consequences they may lead to can be helpful in coping with that hazard when and if it occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baram, M. 1986. Risk Communication: Moving From Theory to Law to Practice. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Risk Analysis, Boston, November 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. 1985. Development of mental models for decision in technological systems. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, and J. Leplat (Eds.) New Technology and Human Error. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V.T., von Winterfeldt, D., and Slovic, P. 1987. Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: Problems and opportunities from a social and behavioral perspective. In V.T. Covello, A. Moghissi, and V.R.R. Uppuluri. (Eds.) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management and Decision Making. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijkelhof, H.M.C., Klaassen, K., Scholte, R., and Lijnse P.L. 1987. “Public and pupils’ ideas about radiation: Some lessons from Chernobyl to science educators”. Paper presented at the Fourth International Symposium on World Trends in Science and Technology Education, Kiel, August, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. 1985. Cognitive and institutional barriers to “informed consent”. In M. Gibson (Ed.) Risk, Consent, and Air. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. 1983. “The public” vs. “The experts”: Perceived vs. actual disagreements about risks of nuclear power. In V. Covello, G. Flamm, J. Rodericks, and R. Tardiff, Analysis of Actual vs. Perceived Risks.. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and Stevens, A.L. 1983. Mental Models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M. 1985. Risk, Consent, and Air. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kister Kaiser, M., Jonides, J. and Alexander, J. 1986. Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory and cognition, 14, 308–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Combs, B. 1978. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. 1983. Intuitive Physics. Scientific American, 248, 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. 1980. Human Inference Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltu, M. 1985. The role of communication media. In H. Otway and M. Peltu (Eds.) Regulating Industrial Risks. London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. 1981. Informing the public about the risks from ionizing radiation. Health Physics, 41, 589–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. 1984. Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychologica, 56, 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. and Fischhoff, B. 1985. Levels of environmental decisions. Journal of environmental Psychology, 5, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C.A.J, and Stallen, P.J. 1981. Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keren, G., Eijkelhof, H. (1991). Prior knowledge and risk communication: The case of nuclear radiation and X-rays. In: Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M. (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7372-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1952-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics