Abstract
Water is a major constraint to development of all countries with low water access, especially those located in arid and semi-arid areas with heavy dependence on agriculture. Water scarcity due to long-term droughts, increased demand, and mismanagement of the available water resources has threaten the sustainability of agricultural development. The need of more food production for growing population drives the agricultural sector to manage the water resources in a sustainable way. Water sustainability encompasses different dimensions which need to be addressed clearly by appropriate indices. The Agricultural Water Poverty Index as an assessment tool measures the level of agricultural water poverty as the most important construct that influences agricultural water management. It encompasses a variety of water-related aspects including availability and access to water resources, capacities to manage available water usage and finally environmental factors affecting availability of water resources. Each aspect needed to be translated into practical and subtle indicators to demonstrate what it is intended to measure, and also to jointly measure the Agricultural Water Poverty Index. Accurately and reasonable selection of indicators needs to apply a suitable framework which increases scientific credibility of water assessment.
This report develops indicators of Agricultural Water Poverty for assessing the agricultural water situation at farm level. To reach this goal, firstly different current conceptual frameworks suggested to frame the indicator selection process, including causal chain, hierarchical, and integrated framework, are shortly described and criticized. This review reveals that as the causal chain frameworks were improved over time, due to introducing the additional concepts and lack of clear agenda to build such models, the development of their structures has become complicated. Although the hierarchical frame is more simplified, it includes general concepts which are not robust enough to identify practical and useful indicators. Thus, our report focuses on using the Integrated Causal Network and Ecological Hierarchy Network framework to develop the indicators of Agricultural Water Poverty, because it encompasses all the special issues which may be the concern of indicator construction. To modify this framework a conceptual path to develop the indicators of Agricultural Water Poverty is offered, in which a sequence of steps are proposed. This conceptual path leads to the construction of abstract and concrete indicators of Agricultural Water Poverty and applies a quantitative method (Binary Integer Programming) for selecting the final indicators. An Analytic Hierarchy Process is conducted to assign indicator weights and the model criteria requirements are considered. Finally, a total of 25 indicators are determined by translating the requirements into quantitative constraints and resolving the model.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- AWP:
-
Agricultural Water Poverty
- AWPI:
-
Agricultural Water Poverty Index
- AHP:
-
Analytic Hierarchy Process
References
Barry J, Proops J (1999) Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol Econ 28:337–345
Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability: learning by doing, 1st edn. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London
Borja A, Dauer DM (2008) Assessing the environmental quality status in estuarine and coastal systems: comparing methodologies and indices. Ecol Indic 8:331–337. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.05.004
Bouleau G, Argillier Ch, Souchon Y, Barthelemye C, Babut M (2009) How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes—the case of lakes and rivers in France. Ecol Indic 9:1198–1205. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.010
Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10
Doody DG, Kearney P, Barry J, Moles R, O’Regan B (2009) Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators. Ecol Indic 9:1129–1137. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.011
Elle M, Dammann S, Lentsch J, Hansen K (2010) Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: from the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development. Build Environ 45:135–142. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.011
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2007) Coping with water scarcity, challenge of the twenty-first century. Retrieved from http://www.worldwaterday.org
Forouzani M, Karami E (2010) Agricultural water poverty index and sustainability. Agron Sustain Dev 31(2):415–431. doi:10.1051/agro:2010026
Golusin M, Ivanovic OM (2009) Definition, characteristics and state of the indicators of sustainable development in countries of Southeastern Europe. Agr Ecosyst Environ 130:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.11.018
Ioris AAR, Hunter C, Walker S (2008) The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland. J Environ Manage 88:1190–1201. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.007
Jhorar RK, Smit AAM, Roest CWJ (2009) Assessment of alternative water management options for irrigated agriculture. Agr Water Manage 96:975–981
Kurtz JC, Jackson LE, Fisher WS (2001) Strategies for evaluating indicators based on guidelines from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development. Ecol Indic 1:49–60
Lawrence P, Meigh J, Sullivan C (2002) The water poverty index: an international comparison, vol KERP 2002/19, Keele economics research papers. Centre for Economic Research, Keele University, Keele, pp 1–19, ISSN: 1352–8955
Lin T, Lin JY, Cui Sh, Cameron S (2009) Using a network framework to quantitatively select ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 9:1114–1120. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.009
Malano H, Burton M, Makin I (2004) Benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector: a tool for change. Irrig Drain 53(2):119–133
Malkina-Pykh IG, Pykh YA (2008) Quality-of-life indicators at different scales: theoretical background. Ecol Indic 8:854–862. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.01.008
Manoliadis OG (2002) Development of ecological indicators—a methodological framework using compromise programming. Ecol Indic 2:169–176
Muller F, Lenz R (2006) Ecological indicators: theoretical fundamentals of consistent applications in environmental management. Ecol Indic 6:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.001
Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8:14–25. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012
Pereira LS, Oweis Th, Zairi A (2002) Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agr Water Manage 57:175–206
Perret S, Touchain E (2002) A simulation-based approach to assess the economic viability of smallholding irrigation schemes in South Africa: conceptualization and first implementation, No. 02/02, Research Report to CIRAD-Tera. CIRAD-Tera/University of Pretoria, Pretoria
Rijsberman FR (2006) Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agr Water Manage 80:5–22. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.001
Ronchi E, Federico A, Musmeci F (2002) A system oriented integrated indicator for sustainable development in Italy. Ecol Indic 2:197–210
Sadeghi Niaraki A, Kim K (2009) Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach. Expert Syst Appl 36:2250–2259. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.053
Smeets E, Weterings R (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview, vol 25, Technical report. European Environment Agency (EEA), Copenhagen
Sullivan C (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30(7):1195–1211. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9
Torabi Haghighi A, Keshtkaran P (2008) Method of facing with drought in Fars province-Iran. XXIV conference of the Danubian countries on hydrological forecasting and hydrological bases of water management, Bled, 2–4 June 2008
Turnhout E, Hisschemoller M, Eijsackers H (2007) Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecol Indic 7:215–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003
Yang H, Zhang X, Zehnder AJB (2003) Water scarcity, pricing mechanism and institutional reform in northern China irrigated agriculture. Agr Water Manage 61:143–161
Yli-Viikari A, Hietala-Koivu R, Hyvönen E, Perälä P, Turtola E (2007) Evaluating agri-environmental indicators (AEIs)—use and limitations of international indicators at national level. Ecol Indic 7:150–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.11.005
Acknowledgements
Part of this paper was completed during a fellowship study at the International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS), Leiden/Amsterdam, Netherlands. This research was supported in part by the Iran National Drought Research Institute, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran under grant No. 333PG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forouzani, M., Karami, E., Zibaei, M., Zamani, G.H. (2012). Agricultural Water Poverty Index for a Sustainable World. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Farming for Food and Water Security. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4500-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4500-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4499-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4500-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)