Abstract
As of December 2008 the U.S. government has built just over 370 mi (595 km) of fencing along its southern boundary, half of the quantity mandated by Congress in the 2006 Secure Fence Act. Expanding from 73 mi (118 km) of fencing in 2001, the construction of border fencing has unfolded in tandem with massive investments in surveillance and Border Patrol staffing. Enabled by waivers suspending 37 laws and regulations governing federal construction projects, the Department of Homeland Security has planned and constructed the border wall with unprecedented speed and with an unprecedented lack of oversight. As early reports of fence-induced flooding, environmental destruction, and human rights violations prefigure the wall’s future impacts, I argue that the border wall is situated in a complex of security technologies imagined to secure the nation as a whole. Thus, the negative impacts of fence construction are felt locally, while the benefits of physical barriers remain undetermined. Billed as necessary to the very survival of the United States, this scalar disjuncture works to localize and further marginalize the negative consequences of border construction, with significant and lasting consequences for the cultural, political, economic, and physical geographies of the Mexico-U.S. borderlands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25, 336–351.
Amoore, L., & de Goede, M. (2008). Transactions after 9/11: the banal face of the preemptive strike. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 173–185.
Andreas, P. (2000). Border games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico divide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bialasiewicz, L., Campbell, D., Elden, S., Graham, S., Jeffrey, A., & Williams, A. (2007). Performing security: The imaginative geographies of current U.S. strategy. Political Geography, 26, 405–422.
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27, 63–92.
Bigo, D. (2007). Detention of foreigners, states of exception, and the social practices of control of the banopticon. In P. K. Rajaram & C. Grundy-Warr (Eds.), Borderscapes: Hidden geographies at territory’s edge (pp. 3–34). Minneapolis, VIC: University of Minnesota Press.
Brunn, S., Watkins, J., Fargo, T., Lepawsky, J., & Jones, J. 2000. Towards a geopolitics of life and living: Where boundaries still matter. In H. N. Nicol & I. Townsend-Gault (Eds.), Holding the line: Borders in a global world (pp. 381–399).Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
California Coastal Commission. (2003). Staff report and recommendation on consistency determination. San Francisco, CA: California Coastal Commission.
Coleman, M. (2005). U.S. statecraft and the U.S.-Mexico border as security/economy nexus. Political Geography, 24, 185–209.
Coleman, M. (2007). Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico-U.S. Border. Antipode, 39(1), 43–76.
Coleman, M. (2008). Between public policy and foreign policy: U.S. immigration law reform and the undocumented migrant. Urban Geography, 28(1), 4–28.
Cornelius, W. (2001). Death at the border: Efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 661–685.
Dunn, T. (1996). The militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border, 1978–1992. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Press.
Dunn, T. (2001). Waging a war on immigrants at the U.S.-Mexico Border: human rights implications In P. Kraska (Ed.), Militarizing the American criminal justice system: The changing roles of the armed forces and the police (pp. 65–81). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Fernandes, D. (2007). Targeted: Homeland Security and the business of immigration detention. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Gilman, D. (2008). Background and context. Resource document. Working Group on Human Rights and the Border Wall. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.utexas.edu/law/academics/centers/humanrights/publications/Background_and_Context.pdf
Garay, A. (2008). Border patrol halts building of 3 border wall. Resource Document. Associated Press. November 7, 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6101451.html
Grundy-War, C., & Schofield, C. (2005). Reflections on the relevance of classic approaches and contemporary priorities in boundary studies. Geopolitics, 10, 650–662.
Guzman, M., & Hurwitz, Z. (2008). Violations on the part of the United States Government of Indigenous Rights Held by Members of the Lipan Apache, Kickapoo, and Ysleta del Sur Tigua Tribes of the Texas-Mexico Border. In Working Group on Human Rights and the Border Wall. 2008. Obstructing human rights: The Texas-Mexico border wall. Submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, June 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.utexas.edu/law/academics/centers/humanrights/publications/TexasBorderWall.html
Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hostelge, S. (2008). Longer, taller fencing gives illegal migrants a higher hurdle. Resource document. The Arizona Republic. Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2008/11/13/20081113borderclimb1113.html
Hyndman, J., & Mountz, A. (2008), Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe. Government and Opposition, 43(2), 259–269.
Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance after September 11th. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Nevins, J. (2002). Operation Gatekeeper: The rise of the 'Illegal Alien' and the making of the U.S.-Mexico boundary. New York: Routledge.
Nevins, J. (2007). Dying for a cup of coffee? Migrant deaths in the U.S.-Mexico border region in a neoliberal Age. Geopolitics, 12(2), 228–247.
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161.
Nuñez-Neto, B., & Kim, Y. (2008). Border security: Barriers along the U.S. international border. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service
Organization of American States Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (2008). Webcast of Public Hearings, 133rd Period of Sessions, October 22, 2008. Resource document. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.oas.org/oaspage/videosasf/2008/10/CIDH5_texan_border.wmv
Rio Grande Guardian. (2008). Cuellar: CBP halts border fence construction in three valley segments. 7 November 2008. http://www.riograndeguardian.com
Salter, M. (2006). The global visa regime and the political technologies of the international self: Borders, bodies, biopolitics. Alternatives, 31, 167–189.
Sierra Club. (2008). Sierra Club Border Policy Campaign: Unprecedented power for a political appointee: The REAL ID Act waiver. Resource Document. Retrieved November 4, 2008, from http://arizona.sierraclub.org/border/realid.asp
Summy, K. R. (2008). Open letter to Texas politicians. Resource document. No border wall coalition. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://notexasborderwall.blogspot.com/2008/09/texas-politicians-ignoring-danger-that.html
Sundberg, J., & Kaserman, B. (2007). Cactus carvings and desert defecations: embodying representations of border crossings in protected areas on the Mexico-U.S. border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 727–744.
Tuscon Citizen. (2007). Chertoff favors border fence over ‘habitat for a lizard.’ October 12, 2007. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/altss/printstory/border/65671
U.S. DHS. (2008a). Secure border initiative. Resource document. Department of homeland security. Retrieved October 29, 2008, from http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/editorial_0868.shtm
U.S. DHS. (2008b). The Southwest border fence. Resource Document. Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/border-fence-southwest.shtm
U.S. Department of the Interior. (2008). Effects of the international boundary pedestrian fence in the vicinity of Lukeville, Arizona on drainage systems and infrastructure, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona. Ajo, AZ: National Park Service.
U.S. Government Accounting Office. (2001). INS’ southwest border strategy: Resource and impact issues remain after seven years. GAO-01-842. Washington, DC.
U.S. Government Accounting Office. (2008). Secure border initiative fiscal year: 2008 expenditure plans show improvement, but deficiencies limit congressional oversight and DHS accountability. GAO-08-739R. Washington, DC.
U.S. Government Accounting Office. (2009). Secure Border Initiative Fence Construction Costs. GAO-09-244R. Washington, DC.
U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. (1996). Building a comprehensive border enforcement strategy. U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Washington, DC.
Walters, W. (2006). Border/control. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 187–203.
Wilson, J. G., Benavides, J., Reisinger, A., Lemen, J., Hurwitz, Z., Spangler, J., et al. (2008). An analysis of demographic disparities associated with the proposed U.S.-Mexico border fence in Cameron County, Texas. Resource Document. Working Group on Human Rights and the Border Wall. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.utexas.edu/law/academics/centers/humanrights/publications/TexasBorderWall.html
Working Group on Human Rights and the Border Wall. (2008). Obstructing human rights: The Texas-Mexico border wall. Submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, June 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.utexas.edu/law/academics/centers/humanrights/publications/TexasBorderWall.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, L. (2011). Constructing the Border Wall – The Social and Environmental Impacts of Border: Mexico-U.S. Border Policy. In: Brunn, S. (eds) Engineering Earth. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_97
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_97
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9919-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9920-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)