Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Direkte und indirekte Beeinflussungen von hybriden Organisationen auf traditionelle Wirtschaft und Gesetzgebung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CSR und Social Enterprise

Part of the book series: Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility ((MRCOSORE))

  • 3987 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag befasst sich mit der Kernfrage, wie es hybriden Organisationen gelingt, traditionelle Wirtschaft und Gesetzgebung hinsichtlich sozialer und ökologischer Belange zu beeinflussen. Beeinflussung wird dabei verstanden als das Maß an kognitiver Irritation und Veränderung auf Praxisebene. Nach einer kurzen begrifflichen Einordnung werden sozioökonomische Leuchttürme als eine spezielle Form von hybriden Organisationen herausgearbeitet, die eine besonders hohe Beeinflussung auf Wirtschaft und Gesetzgebung haben. Hiermit ist das heterogene Feld von Social Enterprises und Social Entrepreneurs genauer kartographiert. Ausgehend von mehreren theoretischen Referenzpunkten und drei Fallbeispielen wird ein Rahmenmodell von sozialen Innovationsprozessen auf gesellschaftlicher Ebene sowie ein Rollenmodell von sozioökonomischen Leuchttürmen herausgearbeitet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alvord SH, Brown LD, Letts C (2004) Social entrepreneurship and social transformation: an exploratory study. J Appl Behav Sci 40(3):260–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier HK, Then V (2004) Zwischen Eigennutz und Gemeinwohl – Neue Formen und Wege der Gemeinnützigkeit. Bertelsmann, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Lee M, Walker J, Dorsey Ch (2012) In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 10(3):51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis D (Hrsg) (2010) Hybrid organizations and the third sector – challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein D (2004) How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop M (2006) The rise of the social entrepreneur: Whatever he may be. The economist 378(8466):11–13, special edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd B, Henning N, Reyna E, Wang DE, Welch MD (2009) Hybrid organisations: new business model for environmental leadership. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberger AR (2011) A new type of hybrid. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 9(3):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny J, Nyssens M (2010) Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: convergences and divergences. J Soc Entrepreneursh 1(1):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drayton B (2002) The citizen sector: becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. Calif Manage Rev 44(3):120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drayton B (2005) Social entrepreneurs: creating a competitive and entrepreneurial citizen sector. www.changemakers.net/library/readings/drayton.cfm. Zugegriffen: 18. Mai 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson J (2004) The blended value map: tracking the intersects and opportunities of economic, social and environmental value creation. http://www.blendedvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2004/02/pdf-bv-map.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Mai 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers A (2005) Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: changes in the governance and provision of social services. Int J Public Adm 28(9,10):736–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers A (2008) Hybrid organisations – background, concept, challenges. In: Osborne SP (Hrsg) The third sector in Europe – prospects and challenges. Routledge, Abingdon, S 279–292

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel G, Schmitz B (2012) Hybride Organisationen – Spezial- oder Regelfall? In: Anheier H, Schröer A, Then V (Hrsg) Soziale Investitionen. VS, Wiesbaden, S 181–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill TL, Kothari TH, Shea M (2010) Patterns of meaning in the social entrepreneurship literature: a research platform. J Soc Entrepreneursh 1(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts K (2006) Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose business ventures. In: Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (Hrsg) Social entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, S 142–153

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger U, Schröer A (2013) Integrated organisational identity: a definition of hybrid organisations and a research agenda. Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organ 25(5):1279–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organisations. Acad Manag J 56(1):137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer R (1981) Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. University of California Press, Berkeley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater C (2007) Social enterprises and social innovation: strategies for the next ten years. A social enterprise think piece for the Cabinet Office of the Third Sector. http://www.charlesleadbeater.net/cms/xstandard/social_enterprise_innovation.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Mai 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Martí I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J World Bus 41(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (Hrsg) (2006) Social entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayr M, Schneider U, Meyer M, Pospisil M, Skarabelova S, Travickova D (2007) Nonprofits’ function in old and new democracies – an integrative framework and empirical evidence for Austria and the Czech Republic. Working paper 02/2007. Institute for Social Policy, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A (2006) Introduction. In: Nicholls A (Hrsg) Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1):62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon LM, Hems LC, Chinnock K (2000) The nonprofit sector – for what and for whom? Working papers of the John Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 37. The John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (2013) Muster organisationaler Hybridität. In: Gebauer J, Schirmer H, Fels M (Hrsg) Unternehmerisch und verantwortlich wirken? – Forschung an der Schnittstelle von Corporate Social Responsibility und Social Entrepreneurship. Schriftenreihe des IÖW 204/13. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, S 69–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (2015a) Beyond structural governance – tension moments and the preservation of core values in hybrid organizations. Int Stud Manag Organ 45(3):241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (2015b) Social entrepreneurship, social innovation and social mission organizations: towards a conceptualization. In: Cnaan RA, Vinokur-Kaplan D (Hrsg) Cases in innovative nonprofits: organizations that make a difference. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, S 17–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (2016) Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen. Z Soz Fortschr 65(1-2):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B, Glänzel G (2016) Hybrid organisations – concept and measurement. Int J Organ Analysis 24(1):18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B, Then V (2011) Legitimation durch Narration – Bindungskräfte durch das Erzählen von Geschichten. In: Hackenberg H, Empter S (Hrsg) Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. VS, Wiesbaden, S 339–350

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher C (2012) What do we mean when we talk about ‘hybrids’ and ‘hybridity’ in public management and governance? Working paper, Institute of Local Government Studies. University of Birmingham, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SR (2010) Hybridization and nonprofit organisations: the governance challenge. Policy Soc 29(3):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr N (2008) Moral markets – how knowledge and affluence change consumers and products. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huijstee M, Glasbergen P (2010) NGos moving business – an analysis of contrasting strategies. Bus Soc 49:591–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald MN (2004) Making change – Why does the social sector need social movements? Stanf Soc Innov Rev 2(3):24–34 (http://www.civicventures.org/network/files/ZALD.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald MN, Morrill C, Rao H (2005) The impact of social movements on organizations. In: Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott RW, Zald MN (Hrsg) Social movements and organization theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, S 253–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf W (1989) Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt 40(1-2):170–183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philiomondo, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Björn Schmitz

Authors
  1. Björn Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Schmitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Frankfurt, Germany

    Alexander Kraemer

  2. Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Laura Marie Edinger-Schons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schmitz, B. (2019). Direkte und indirekte Beeinflussungen von hybriden Organisationen auf traditionelle Wirtschaft und Gesetzgebung. In: Kraemer, A., Edinger-Schons, L. (eds) CSR und Social Enterprise. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55591-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55591-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55590-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55591-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation