Skip to main content

Die Bioökonomie unter dem Blickwinkel der Innovationsökonomie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioökonomie für Einsteiger

Zusammenfassung

Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung darf nicht nur – wie in der neoklassischen Ökonomik – an quantitativen Wachstumsmaßstäben gemessen werden. Vielmehr muss sie – in Anknüpfung an die Schumpetersche Ökonomik – auch nach der qualitativen Veränderung grundlegender wirtschaftlicher Strukturen über längere Zeiträume hinweg beurteilt werden. Insbesondere der Übergang in eine wissensbasierte Bioökonomie, bei dem es sich um einen radikalen, langfristigen Transformationsprozess handelt, sollte in diesem Sinn betrachtet werden. Dieses Kapitel verfolgt deshalb einen innovationsökonomischen Ansatz, um die bevorstehenden Wandlungsprozesse angemessen zu skizzieren und in den generellen Kontext einer Ökonomie des Wandels zu stellen. Wachstumsoptimistisch beleuchtet es das Zusammenspiel unterschiedlicher Akteure in wissensintensiven Innovationssystemen und fragt nach den Bedingungen für Konzepte, die ganze Volkwirtschaften auf einen neuen Entwicklungspfad bringen können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Audretsch D, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11(2):253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt J, Cunningham R (Hrsg) (2014) The Post-Growth Project: how the end of economic growth could bring a fairer and happier society. Green House, e-prints, Aston

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper S, Lehrer M, Soskice D (1999) Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Ind Innov 6(1):114–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant G, Huet S, Amblard F (2005) An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit. Am J Sociol 110(4):1041–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament (2013) Verordnung Nr. 1296/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Dezember 2013 über ein Programm der Europäischen Union für Beschäftigung und soziale Innovation (″EaSI″). Brüssel. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013R1296

  • Foray D, David PA, Hall B (2009) Smart specialization – the Concept. Knowl Econ Policy Brief 9. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/monitoring/knowledge_en.htm

  • Freeman C (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res Policy 20(5):499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8):1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green L, Pyka A, Schön B (2013) A life-cycle based taxonomy of innovation networks – with focus on public-private collaboration. In: Gallouj F, Rubalcaba L, Windrum P (Hrsg) Public-Private Innovation Networks in Services. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, S 113–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall PA, Soskice D (Hrsg) Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. University Press, Oxford, S 1–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch H, Pyka A (2013) Social innovations in the perspective of Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. In: Ruiz Viñals C, Parra Rodríguez C (Hrsg) Social Innovation – New forms of organization in knowledge-based societies. Routledge, London, S 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells J (2002) The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition–does the sailing ship effect exist? J Manag Stud 39(7):887–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J (2014) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper S (1997) Industry Life Cycle. Ind Corp Chang 6(1):145–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner& Marx, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-A (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-A (1998) Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technol Analysis Strateg Manag 10(4):403–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato M, Perez C (2015) Innovation as growth policy. In: Fagerberg J, Laestadius S, Martin BR (Hrsg) The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change, and Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, S 229

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Martin BR (2010) Technology Policy and Global Warming: Why new Policy Models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles would not work). Res Policy 39:1011–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nyblom J, Borgatti S, Roslakka J, Salo MA (2003) Statistical analysis of network data - an application to diffusion of innovation. Soc Networks 25(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyka A (2002) Innovation Networks in Economics – From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based Approaches. Eur J Innov Manag 5(3):152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyka A (2017) The transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy. In: Dabbert S et al (Hrsg) Strategies for Knowledge-driven Developments in the Bioeconomy – an international and interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyka A, Buchmann T (2017) Die Transformation zur wissensbasierten Bioökonomie. In: Burr W, Stephan M (Hrsg) Technologie, Strategie und Organisation. Springer, Berlin und Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez C (2010) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge J Econ 34(1):185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez C (2014) Financial bubbles, crises and the role of government in unleashing golden ages. In: Pyka A, Burghof H-P (Hrsg) Innovation and Finance. Routledge, Milton Park, S 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M, Swan J, Newell S (1996) The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. J Manag Stud 33:333–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahal D (1985) Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Res Policy 14(2):61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schomberg R von (2011) Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation, in: Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, President and Fellows of Harvard College. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh CG (2000) Undesrtanding Carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente TW (1996) Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc Networks 18(1):69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker E von (2010) Introduction, Factor Five: The Global Imperative. In: Von Weizsäcker E et al (Hrsg) Factor Five – Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. Earthscan, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, S 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (1999) Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manag J 26(9):809–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pyka, A. (2017). Die Bioökonomie unter dem Blickwinkel der Innovationsökonomie. In: Pietzsch, J. (eds) Bioökonomie für Einsteiger. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53763-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics