Zusammenfassung
Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung darf nicht nur – wie in der neoklassischen Ökonomik – an quantitativen Wachstumsmaßstäben gemessen werden. Vielmehr muss sie – in Anknüpfung an die Schumpetersche Ökonomik – auch nach der qualitativen Veränderung grundlegender wirtschaftlicher Strukturen über längere Zeiträume hinweg beurteilt werden. Insbesondere der Übergang in eine wissensbasierte Bioökonomie, bei dem es sich um einen radikalen, langfristigen Transformationsprozess handelt, sollte in diesem Sinn betrachtet werden. Dieses Kapitel verfolgt deshalb einen innovationsökonomischen Ansatz, um die bevorstehenden Wandlungsprozesse angemessen zu skizzieren und in den generellen Kontext einer Ökonomie des Wandels zu stellen. Wachstumsoptimistisch beleuchtet es das Zusammenspiel unterschiedlicher Akteure in wissensintensiven Innovationssystemen und fragt nach den Bedingungen für Konzepte, die ganze Volkwirtschaften auf einen neuen Entwicklungspfad bringen können.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Audretsch D, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11(2):253–273
Blewitt J, Cunningham R (Hrsg) (2014) The Post-Growth Project: how the end of economic growth could bring a fairer and happier society. Green House, e-prints, Aston
Burt RS (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399
Casper S, Lehrer M, Soskice D (1999) Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Ind Innov 6(1):114–139
Deffuant G, Huet S, Amblard F (2005) An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit. Am J Sociol 110(4):1041–1069
Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162
Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London
Europäisches Parlament (2013) Verordnung Nr. 1296/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Dezember 2013 über ein Programm der Europäischen Union für Beschäftigung und soziale Innovation (″EaSI″). Brüssel. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013R1296
Foray D, David PA, Hall B (2009) Smart specialization – the Concept. Knowl Econ Policy Brief 9. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/monitoring/knowledge_en.htm
Freeman C (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res Policy 20(5):499–514
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8):1257–1274
Green L, Pyka A, Schön B (2013) A life-cycle based taxonomy of innovation networks – with focus on public-private collaboration. In: Gallouj F, Rubalcaba L, Windrum P (Hrsg) Public-Private Innovation Networks in Services. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, S 113–138
Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall PA, Soskice D (Hrsg) Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. University Press, Oxford, S 1–68
Hanusch H, Pyka A (2013) Social innovations in the perspective of Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. In: Ruiz Viñals C, Parra Rodríguez C (Hrsg) Social Innovation – New forms of organization in knowledge-based societies. Routledge, London, S 29–43
Howells J (2002) The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition–does the sailing ship effect exist? J Manag Stud 39(7):887–906
Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J (2014) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180
Klepper S (1997) Industry Life Cycle. Ind Corp Chang 6(1):145–182
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner& Marx, Boston
Lundvall B-A (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers., London
Lundvall B-A (1998) Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technol Analysis Strateg Manag 10(4):403–422
Mazzucato M, Perez C (2015) Innovation as growth policy. In: Fagerberg J, Laestadius S, Martin BR (Hrsg) The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change, and Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, S 229
Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York
Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Martin BR (2010) Technology Policy and Global Warming: Why new Policy Models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles would not work). Res Policy 39:1011–1023
Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA)
Nyblom J, Borgatti S, Roslakka J, Salo MA (2003) Statistical analysis of network data - an application to diffusion of innovation. Soc Networks 25(2):175–195
Pyka A (2002) Innovation Networks in Economics – From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based Approaches. Eur J Innov Manag 5(3):152–163
Pyka A (2017) The transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy. In: Dabbert S et al (Hrsg) Strategies for Knowledge-driven Developments in the Bioeconomy – an international and interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, New York
Pyka A, Buchmann T (2017) Die Transformation zur wissensbasierten Bioökonomie. In: Burr W, Stephan M (Hrsg) Technologie, Strategie und Organisation. Springer, Berlin und Heidelberg
Pérez C (2010) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge J Econ 34(1):185–202
Pérez C (2014) Financial bubbles, crises and the role of government in unleashing golden ages. In: Pyka A, Burghof H-P (Hrsg) Innovation and Finance. Routledge, Milton Park, S 11–25
Robertson M, Swan J, Newell S (1996) The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. J Manag Stud 33:333–360
Sahal D (1985) Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Res Policy 14(2):61–82
Schomberg R von (2011) Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation, in: Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 39–61
Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, President and Fellows of Harvard College. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.
Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York
Unruh CG (2000) Undesrtanding Carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817–830
Valente TW (1996) Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc Networks 18(1):69–89
Weizsäcker E von (2010) Introduction, Factor Five: The Global Imperative. In: Von Weizsäcker E et al (Hrsg) Factor Five – Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. Earthscan, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, S 1–19
Whitley R (1999) Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manag J 26(9):809–825
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pyka, A. (2017). Die Bioökonomie unter dem Blickwinkel der Innovationsökonomie. In: Pietzsch, J. (eds) Bioökonomie für Einsteiger. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53763-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53763-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53762-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53763-3
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)