Arbeitsleistung im Kontext von Laufbahnentwicklung

Niessen, Cornelia; Hommelhoff, Sabine; Mäder, Inge

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_17

Cornelia Niessen³,
Sabine Hommelhoff³ &
Inge Mäder³

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

27k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die individuelle Arbeitsleistung ist eine wichtige Grundlage für Laufbahn- und Karriereentscheidungen. In diesem Kapitel werden Forschungsergebnisse diskutiert, die Zusammenhänge zwischen den verschiedenen Facetten von Arbeitsleistung, Leistungsbeurteilungen und Karriereerfolg aufzeigen. Dabei werden auch der organisationale Kontext sowie formale Leistungsbewertungssysteme mit ihren Vorteilen und Nachteilen berücksichtigt, ebenso wie individuelle Karriereeinstellungen und Leistungsvoraussetzungen. Es wird aufgezeigt, dass eine gute Arbeitsleistung nur unter bestimmten organisationalen Bedingungen laufbahn- und karrierewirksam ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 159.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 169.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.493.
Article Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management – And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54, 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.06.001.
Article Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.247.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (2001). The influences of ratee gender on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2561–2587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00191.x.
Article Google Scholar
Altenbockum, J. von. (2015). Selbst ist die Frau. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/kommentar-zur-einfuehrung-der-frauenquote-selbst-ist-diefrau-13468414.html. Zugegriffen am 09.05.2015.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367.
Article Google Scholar
Anseel, F., Van Yperen, N. W., Janssen, O., & Duyck, W. (2011). Feedback type as a moderator of the relationship between achievement goals and feedback reactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X516372.
Article Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance management: Key strategies and practical guidelines (2. Aufl.). London: Kogan Page.
Google Scholar
Arvey, R. D., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. (2004). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (3., neubearb. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Astheimer, S. (2015). Ältere Mitarbeiter verdienen das Doppelte. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/studie-zum-einkommen-von-fachkraeften-in-deutschland-13524339.html. Zugegriffen am 09.05.2015.
Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.006.
Article Google Scholar
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.193.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bashaw, R. E., & Grant, E. S. (1994). Exploring the distinctive nature of work commitments: Their relationships with personal characteristics, job performance, and propensity to leave. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.1994.10753984.
Article Google Scholar
Bates, R. (2002). Liking and similarity as predictors of multi-source ratings. Personnel Review, 31, 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480210438753.
Article Google Scholar
Beauducel, A., & Leue, A. (2014). Psychologische Diagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407508.
Article Google Scholar
BertelsmannStiftung. (2011, November). Studienergebnisse zur Presseerklärung: Gerechter Arbeitsmarkt. BertelsmannStiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/34_Wirtschaftliche_Dynamik_und_Beschaeftigung/Ergebnisse_Umfrage_Gerechter_Arbeitsmarkt_2011.pdf. Zugegriffen am 14.10.2015.
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Hrsg.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Selecting and developing members for the organization (Bd. 2, S. 567–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-019.
Chapter Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Blickle, G. (2011). Leistungsbeurteilung. In F. W. Nerdinger, G. B. Blickle & N. Schaper (Hrsg.), Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 253–271). Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Hrsg.), Personnel selection in organizations (S. 77–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.168.
Article Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 40–50.
Google Scholar
Budworth, M.-H., & Mann, S. L. (2011). Performance management: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 21, 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.014.
Article Google Scholar
Budworth, M. H., Latham, G. P., & Manroop, L. (2015). Looking forward to performance improvement: A field test of the feedforward interview for performance management. Human Resource Management, 54, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21618.
Article Google Scholar
Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 1–44.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Bd. 1, 2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 687–732). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2006). Global performance management systems. In G. K. Stahl & I. Björkman (Hrsg.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (S. 176–196). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615.
Article Google Scholar
Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.13.
Article Google Scholar
Cohan, P. (2013). Marissa’s second epic fail: Microsoft abolishes stack ranking as Yahoo ramps it up. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/11/13/marissas-second-epic-fail-microsoft-abolishes-stack-ranking-as-yahoo-ramps-it-up/. Zugegriffen am 14.05.2015.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J. et al. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757.
Compensation Online. (2015). Gehaltsbiografien 2015. Compensation Online. https://www.compensation-online.de/ihk/Gehaltsbiografie2015.pdf. Zugegriffen am 09.05.2015.
Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10, 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2.
Article Google Scholar
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304.
Article Google Scholar
De Waal, A., & Kourtit, K. (2013). Performance measurement and management in practice: Advantages, disadvantages and reasons for use. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62, 446–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0118.
Article Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Perspectives, 14, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909845.
Article Google Scholar
Dette, D. E., Abele, A. E., & Renner, O. (2004). Zur Definition und Messung von Berufserfolg: Theoretische Überlegungen und metaanalytische Befunde zum Zusammenhang von externen und internen Laufbahnerfolgsmaßen. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 3, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.3.4.170.
Article Google Scholar
Dominick, P. G. (2009). Forced rankings: Pros, cons, and practices. In J. W. Smither & M. London (Hrsg.), Performance management: Putting research into action (S. 411–444). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235.
Article Google Scholar
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.717.
Article Google Scholar
Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14, 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06.
Article Google Scholar
Fetz, S. (2013). Gender Pay Gap: Wie groß ist der Unterschied wirklich? Die Zeit. http://www.zeit.de/karriere/beruf/2013-03/lohnunterschied-geschlechter-statistik. Zugegriffen am 05.05.2015.
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167488.
Article Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (2008). Performance appraisal: Assessing and developing performance and potential. In N. Chmiel (Hrsg.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (2., neubearb. Aufl.). Malden: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/256422.
Article Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (2016). Success and luck: Good fortune and the myth of meritocracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Frerichs, F. (2017). Altern in der Erwerbsarbeit: Laufbahngestaltung bei begrenzter Tätigkeitsdauer. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Ganzach, Y. (1995). Negativity (and positivity) in performance evaluation: Three field studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.80.4.491.
Article Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., & Longenecker, C. O. (1994). Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/00902616(94)90047-7.
Article Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A., & Godshalk, V. M. (2009). Career management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Neale, M. (2000). The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: Investigating the role of situational constraints. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00029.
Article Google Scholar
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438.
Article Google Scholar
Grote, R. C. (2005). Forced ranking. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Grund, C., & Sliwka, D. (2009). The anatomy of performance appraisals in Germany. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903175613.
Article Google Scholar
Gubler, M. (2017). Neue Laufbahnmodelle in Theorie und Praxis: Eine kritische Würdigung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Harris, M. M., Smith, D. E., & Champagne, D. (1995). A field study of performance appraisal purpose: Research – versus administrative – based ratings. Personnel Psychology, 48, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01751.x.
Article Google Scholar
Hartmann, M., & Kopp, J. (2001). Elitenselektion durch Bildung oder durch Herkunft? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 53, 436–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-001-0074-6.
Article Google Scholar
Hartmann, F., & Slapničar, S. (2009). How formal performance evaluation affects trust between superior and subordinate managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.004.
Article Google Scholar
Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hell, B., Schuler, H., Boramir, I., & Schaar, H. (2006). Verwendung und Einschätzung von Verfahren der internen Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung im 10 Jahres-Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 20, 58–78.
Google Scholar
Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Hrsg.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (S. 21–55). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.270.
Article Google Scholar
Heslin, P. A., & VandeWalle, D. (2008). Managers’ implicit assumptions about personnel. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00578.x.
Article Google Scholar
Hirschi, A. (2017). Karriere- und Talentmanagement in Unternehmen. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Hofer, A., & Spurk, D. (2017). Laufbahn-Commitment. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.555.
Article Google Scholar
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256741.
Article Google Scholar
Hüttges, A., & Fay, D. (2017). Proaktives Verhalten: Schlüsselkompetenz für die Karriereentwicklung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Ilgen, D., & Hollenbeck J. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Bd. 2, 2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 165–207) [e-book]. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Zugegriffen am 26.06.2015 unter PsycINFO, Ipswich.
Google Scholar
Jawahar, I. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of task and contextual performance influences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24, 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.580806.
Article Google Scholar
Jawahar, I. M., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01487.x.
Article Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 984–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x.
Article Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010). The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.002.
Article Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16.489–16.493. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107.
Article Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Bd. 1, 2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 75–170). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Google Scholar
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1998). Effects of rating strategy on interdimensional variance, reliability, and validity of interview ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.763.
Article Google Scholar
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.602.
Article Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
Article Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989.
Article Google Scholar
Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021452.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kununu. (2015). Erfahrungsberichte. Kununu. http://www.kununu.com/de/all/de/bf/ing-diba/a/T0BvU1p0 und http://www.kununu.com/de/all/de/bf/comdirect-bank1/a/T0BgVV92. Zugegriffen am 14.10.2015
Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2010). Work in the 21st century (3., neubearb. Aufl.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72.
Article Google Scholar
Larson, J. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay between employees’ feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors’ delivery of performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 14, 408–422. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279075.
Article Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2000). The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: A literature review and proposed causal model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166886.
Article Google Scholar
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005.
Article Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.
Article Google Scholar
Lohaus, D. (2009). Leistungsbeurteilung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Lohaus, D., & Schuler, H. (2014). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3., neubearb. Aufl., S. 357–411). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Löhr, J. (2014). Managergehälter: Hoch und höher. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/beruf-chance/recht-und-gehalt/managergehaelter-13038709.html. Zugegriffen am 15.05.2015.
Longenecker, C. O., Sims, H. P., Jr., & Gioia, D. A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1987.4275731.
Article Google Scholar
Maaß, S. (2013). Wie Unternehmen die Underperformer aufspüren. Die Welt. http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/karriere/article123143543/Wie-Unternehmen-die-Underperformer-aufspueren.html. Zugegriffen am 17.05.2015.
Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2001). In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (S. 397–432). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2006). In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 433–470). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123.
Article Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1957). An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 35, 89–94.
Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567. https://doi.org/10.2307/256798.
Article Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/257011.
Article Google Scholar
Moser, K. (2004). Strategische Elemente in Leistungsbeurteilungen. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Beurteilung und Förderung beruflicher Leistung (2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 115–123). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Motowidlo, S. J., & van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475.
Article Google Scholar
Müller, P. (2011). Einsatz älterer Menschen zur Reduktion des Fachkräftemangels: Eine Analyse in mittelständischen Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Google Scholar
Nankervis, A. R., & Compton, R. L. (2006). Performance management: Theory in practice? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411106061509.
Article Google Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.93.2.392.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). A conservation of resources perspective on career hurdles and salary attainment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.008.
Article Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x.
Article Google Scholar
Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023368.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Niessen, C., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2015). Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000049. Advance online publication.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Niessen, C., Swarowsky, C., & Leiz, M. (2010). Age and adaptation to changes in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 356–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011035287.
Article Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2.
Article Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.
Article Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., Axtell, C. M., & Turner, N. (2001). Designing a safer workplace: Importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.211.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Parmenter, D. (2012). Key performance indicators for government and nonprofit agencies. Hoboken: Wiley.
Book Google Scholar
Peretz, H., & Fried, Y. (2012). National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026011.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mishra, P. (2011). Effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on selection decisions in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020948.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D. (1986). The development of training programs to increase accuracy with different rating tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90027-0.
Article Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693.
Article Google Scholar
Roch, S. G., Woehr, D. J., Mishra, V., & Kieszczynska, U. (2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta‐analytic review of frame‐of‐reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02045.x.
Article Google Scholar
Roe, R. A. (1999). Work performance: A multiple regulation perspective. In G. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Hrsg.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1999 (Bd. 14, S. 231–335). New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43, 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20031.
Article Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571–600. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Schoorman, F. D. (1988). Escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.58.
Article Google Scholar
Schuler, H. (Hrsg.) (2004). Leistungsbeurteilung – Gegenstand, Funktionen und Formen. In Beurteilung und Förderung beruflicher Leistung (2., neubearb. Aufl., S. 1–24). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.956.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Smith, D. E. (1986). Training programs for performance appraisal: A review. Academy of Management Review, 11, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282615.
Article Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta‐analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x.
Article Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Hrsg.), Psychological management of individual performance. Chichester: Wiley.
Chapter Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J., & Pierce, J. L. (1999). Effects of introducing a performance management system on employees’ subsequent attitudes and effort. Public Personnel Management, 28, 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609902800308.
Article Google Scholar
Taylor, H. C., & Russell, J. T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057079.
Article Google Scholar
Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495–523. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393795.
Article Google Scholar
Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359.
Article Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663.
Article Google Scholar
Tondorf, K. (2007). Monetäre Leistungsanreize im öffentlichen Sektor. In W. Matiaske & D. Holtmann (Hrsg.), Leistungsvergütung im Öffentlichen Dienst (S. 25–39). München: Rainer Hamp Verlag.
Google Scholar
Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62, 44–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x.
Article Google Scholar
Towers, W. (2009/2010). U.S. Strategic rewards report. http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=34555. Zugegriffen am 09.05.2015.
Tsui, A. S., Porter, L. W., & Egan, T. D. (2002). When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations, 55, 899–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055008176.
Article Google Scholar
Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29, 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900204.
Article Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902.
Article Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Bd. 17, S. 215–285). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525.
Article Google Scholar
Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.526.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (Bd. 1, S. 110–126). London, UK: Sage.
Chapter Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151.
Article Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557.
Article Google Scholar
Volmer, J., & Köppe, C. (2017). Prognose von Laufbahnerfolg. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Volmer, J., & Spurk, D. (2011). Protean and boundaryless career attitudes: Relationships with subjective and objective career success. Journal for Labour Market Research, 43, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000106.
Article Google Scholar
Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/256734.
Article Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2002). Developing management skills. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.125.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305.
Article Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J. (1994). Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.525.
Article Google Scholar
Yun, S., Takeuchi, R., & Liu, W. (2007). Employee self-enhancement motives and job performance behaviors: Investigating the moderating effects of employee role ambiguity and managerial perceptions of employee commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.745.
Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Lehrstuhl für Psychologie im Arbeitsleben, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
Cornelia Niessen, Sabine Hommelhoff & Inge Mäder

Authors

Cornelia Niessen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sabine Hommelhoff
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Inge Mäder
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Niessen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Institut für Psychologie Arbeits-, Organisations- und Sozialpsychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Simone Kauffeld
Institut für Psychologie Abteilung Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Daniel Spurk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niessen, C., Hommelhoff, S., Mäder, I. (2019). Arbeitsleistung im Kontext von Laufbahnentwicklung. In: Kauffeld, S., Spurk, D. (eds) Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_17

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_17
Published: 15 August 2018
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48749-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48750-1
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics