Skip to main content

Die Wertigkeit der somatosensorisch, visuell und akustisch evozierten Potentiale sowie der transkraniellen Magnetstimulation in der Diagnostik der multiplen Sklerose (MS)

  • Chapter
Evozierte Potentiale
  • 91 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Heute stehen zum Nachweis von Demyelinisierungen und damit zur Frühdiagnostik der multiplen Sklerose (MS) eine Vielzahl diagnostischer Methoden zur Verfügung. Während in den 70er und frühen 80er Jahren neben klinischen Parametern die evozierten Potentiale als nicht invasive Verfahren eine vorrangige Rolle in der Frühdiagnostik der MS spielten (Halliday et al. 1973), haben sie seit Einführung der Kernspintomographie an Bedeutung verloren. Es sollte dennoch nicht vergessen werden, daß die Markscheidenfunktion nur mit elektrophysiologischen Messungen erfaßt werden kann. Grundsätzlich ergänzen sich elektrophysiologische und morphologische Methoden, wobei, je nach Fragestellung, der Stellenwert unterschiedlich ausfallen kann. Für den klinischen Alltag ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, die einzelnen diagnostischen Maßnahmen sorgfältig abzuwägen. In den letzten Jahren läßt sich die Tendenz zu einer umfassenden Frühdiagnostik mit Einschluß der Kernspintomographie beobachten. Unter dem Aspekt einer protektiven Wirkung von einsetzenden Therapien im Frühstadium (Kupersmith et al. 1994) mag dieser Trend zu einer möglichst frühen Diagnose der MS berechtigt sein, dennoch muß bei jedem Patienten überlegt werden, welche diagnostischen Maßnahmen zum gegebenen Zeitpunkt sinnvoll und notwendig sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alexander E, McFarland H (1990) Sjögren’s syndrome mimicking multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 27: 587 – 593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet 1:1106 – 1107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhoff F, Hommes OR, Scheltens P, Valk J (1991) Quantitative MRI-changes in gadolinium-DPTA enhancement after high dose intravenous methylprednisolon in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 41: 1219 – 1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhoff F, Frequin STFM, Hommes OR et al. (1992) A correlative triad of gadolinium-DPTA MRI, EDSS, and CSF-MBP in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with high dose intravenous methylprednisolon. Neurology 42:63 – 67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck RW, Cleary PA, Trobe JD et al. (1993) The effect of corticosteroids for acute optic neuritis on the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 329:1764 – 1769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik J, Novotny O (1989) Value of hyperventilation in pattern-reversal evoked potenials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1107 – 1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S, Rösler KM, Hess CW (1995) Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: Relative sensitivities and specifities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodis-Wollner I (1992) Sensory evoked potentials: PERG, VEP, and SEP. Curr Opin in Neurol Neurosurg 5: 716 – 726

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappa KH, Ropper AH (1982) Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 306:1140 – 1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comi G, Filippi M, Martinelli V et al. (1993) Brain stem magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential studies of symptomatic multiple sclerosis patients. Eur Neurol 33: 232 – 237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler JR, Aminoff MJ, Brant-Zawadzki M (1986) Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study. Ann Neurol 20: 645 – 648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deltenre P, Nechel C van, Vercruysse A, Strul S, Capon A, Ketelaer P (1982) Results of a prospective study on the value of combined visual, somatosensory, brainstem auditory evoked potentials and blink reflex measurements for disclosing subclinical lesions in suspected multiple slcerosis. In: Courjon J, Mauguière F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 473 – 480

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards MK, Farlow MR, Stevens JC (1986) Cranial MR in spinal cord MS: diagnosing patients with isolated spinal chord symptoms. Am J Neuroradiol 7: 1003 – 1005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farlow MR, Markand ON, Edwards MK, Stevens JC, Kolar OJ (1986) Multiple sclerosis: Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked responses, and spinal fluid electrophoresis. Neurology 36: 828 – 831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S, Schmidt R, Niederkorn K, Horner S, Lechner H (1988) Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology 38:1822 – 1825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filippi M, Martinelli V, Locatelli T et al. (1990) Acute and insidious-onset myelopathy of undetermined aetiology: contribution of paraclinical tests to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 237: 171 – 176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filippini G, Comi G, Cosi V et al. (1994) Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 241:132 – 137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francis GS, Antel JP, Duquette P (1993) Inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. In: Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Marsden CD (eds) Neurology in clinical practice, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1134 – 1166

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen J, Larsson H, Olesen J, Stigsby B (1991) MRI, VEP, SEP and biothesiometry suggest monosymptomatic acute optic neuritis to be a first manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 83: 343 – 350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giang D, Grow V, Mooney C et al. (1994) Clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 51: 6166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieser BS, Kurtzberg D, Vaughan HG, Arezzo JC, Aisen ML, Smith CR, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC (1987) Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 44: 281 – 284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerit JM, Argiles AM (1988) The sensitivity of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70: 230 – 238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1973) Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br M J 4: 661 – 664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF, Schriefer TN (1987) Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 22: 744 – 752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hume AL, Waxman SG (1988) Evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis: Diagnostic value and prediction of clinical course. J Neurol Sci 83:191 – 210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DA, Thompson AJ, Swash M (1988) Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:487 – 494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iragui VJ, Wiederholt WC, Romine JS (1986) Serial recordings of multimodality evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: A four year follow-up study. Can J Neurol Sci 13:320 – 326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs L, Kinkel PR, Kinkel WR (1986) Silent brain lesions in patients with isolated optic neuritis: A clinical and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Neurol 43: 452 – 455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ (1993) Visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Effect of time interval, age and disease dissemination. J Neurol 240: 489 – 494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempster PA, Balla JI, Iansek R, Dennis PM (1987) Value of visual evoked response and oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid in diagnosis of spinal multiple sclerosis. Lancet I: 769 – 771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshbin S, Hallett M (1981) Multimodality evoked potentials and blink reflex in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 31: 138 – 144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer M (1983) Evoked potentials. With special reference to the diagnostic value in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 67:67 – 89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmith MJ, Kaufman D, Paty DW et al. (1994) Megadose corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 44:1 – 4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Hashimoto S, Hooge J, Kastrukoff L, Oger J, Li D, Paty D (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a prospective 2-year follow-up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology 41: 657 – 660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli V, Comi G, Filippi M et al. (1991) Paraclinical tests in acute-onset optic neuritis: basal data and results of a short follow-up. Acta Neurol Scand 84: 231 – 236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WB, Wattam-Bell JRB, Pountney E (1982) Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45: 303 – 307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D, Lumsden CE, Acheson ED (1972) Multiple sclerosis: A reappraisal. Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune WI, McGuire A, Aisen A, Gebarski S (1988) Identification of brain lesions in neuropsychiatry systemic lupus erythematosus by MRI. Arthritis Rheum 31:159 – 166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Kendall BE, Narter S, Johnson G, Ormerod IEC, McDonald WI (1987) MR brain scanning in patients with vasculitis: differentiation from multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 29: 226 – 231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Thompson A, Morrissey S et al. (1992) High dose steroids in acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: MRI evidence for a possible mechanism of therapeutic effect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:450 – 453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mushlin A, Mooney C, Grow V, Phelps C, The Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group (1994) The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 51:67 – 72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak GPM, Wiznitzer M, Kurtzberg D, Giesser BS, Vaughan BS Jr (1988) The utility of visual evoked potentials using hemifield stimulation and several check-sizes in the evaluation of suspected multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71:1 – 9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor P, Tansey C, Kucharczyk W, Detsky A, The Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group (1994) A randomized trial of test result sequencing in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 51:53 – 60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod IEC, Bronstein A, Rudge P, Johnson G, MacManus D, Halliday AM, Barratt H, Du Boulay EPGH, Kendal BE, Moseley IF, Jones SJ, Kriss A, Peringer E (1986a) Magnetic resonance imaging in clinically isolated lesions of the brain-stem. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49: 737 – 743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod IEC, McDonald WI, Boulay GH du, Kendall BE, Moseley IF, Halliday AM, Kakigi R, Kriss A, Peringer E (1986b) Disseminated lesions at presentation in patients with optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:124 – 127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod IEC, Miller DH, MacDonald WI, Du Boulay EPGH, Rudge P, Kendall BE, Moseley IF, Johnson G, Tofts PS, Halliday AM, Bronstein AM, Scaravilli F, Harding AE, Barnes D, Zilkha KJ (1987) The role of NMR imaging in the assessment of multiple sclerosis and isolated neurological lesions. A quantiative study. Brain 110:1579 – 1616

    Google Scholar 

  • Paty DW, Asbury AK, Herndon RM, MacFarland HF, MacDonald WI, MacIlroy WJ, Prineas JW, Scheinberg LC, Wolinsky JS (1986) Use of magnetic imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Policy statement. Neurology 36:1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paty DW, Li DKB, The UBS MS/MRI-Study-Group (1993) Interferon beta-lb is effective in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 43: 662 – 667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poser CM (1987) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: An addendum. Ann Neurol 17: 773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, MacDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtelotte WW (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13: 227 – 231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg M, Liguori R, Christiansen P, Larsson H, Soelberg P (1992) The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 42:1296 – 1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo JF, Lessell S (1988) Risk of developing multiple sclerosis after uncomplicated optic neuritis: A long-term prospective study. Neurology 38:185 – 190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staffen W, Trinka E, Ladurner G (1993) Die diagnostische Wertigkeit der Kernspintomographie, der multimodal evozierten Potentiale und der Liquoruntersuchung bei multipler Sklerose. Der Nervenarzt 64: 226 – 232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stöhr M (1994) Das UBO-Syndrom: Eine iatrogene Schädigung durch Kernspintomographie. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 91(46): 2014 – 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Thron A, Koenig E, Pfeiffer P, Rossberg C (19987) Dural vascular anomalies of the spine — an important cause of progressive radiculomyelopathy. In: Cervos-Navarro J, Ferszt R (eds) Stroke and microcirculation. Raven Press, New York, pp 159 – 165

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojaborg W, Boettcher J, Saxtrup O (1981) Evoked potentials and immunoglobulin abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 31: 866 – 871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turano G, Jones S, Miller D, du Boulay G, Kakigi R, McDonald W (1991) Correlation of SEP abnormalities with brain and cervical cord MRI in multiple sclerosis. Brain 114: 663 – 681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uldry P-A, Regli F, Uské A (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord involvement: 28 cases. J Neurol 240:41 – 45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Paoke RA, Fischer ME, Rao SM (1991) Multiple sclerosis: specificity of MR for the diagnosis. Radiology 178: 447 – 456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Altenmüller, E., Dichgans, J. (1996). Die Wertigkeit der somatosensorisch, visuell und akustisch evozierten Potentiale sowie der transkraniellen Magnetstimulation in der Diagnostik der multiplen Sklerose (MS). In: Evozierte Potentiale. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07146-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07146-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-07147-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07146-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics