Skip to main content

Classification of Heterotopic Ossification in Artificial Disc Replacement

  • Chapter

Abstract

The significance or incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) associated with artificial disc replacement is not known at this time. This is not actually surprising as total hip arthroplasty has been around a lot longer than the SB Charité™ prosthesis and in total joint replacement the low incidence in early studies is attributable to imprecise diagnostic criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahrens J, Franklin TD (1997) An average six year clinical evaluation of the Link SB Charité Intervertebral Prosthesis. Link Company Brochure

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 55A: 1629–1632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of the disc prosthesis after a minimum follow up period of 2 years. Spine 8: 995–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel A, Sharp DJ (1991) Heterotopic bone formation after total hip replacement. The influence of the type of osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B: 255–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, Lemaire JP, Zeegers WS (1994) A Multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the Link SB Charité Intervertebral Prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19:1842–1849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire JP, Shalli W, Laveste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diap A, Sauty V, Laloux E (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Rel Res 337:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linovitz R (2001) Prodisc. Retrospective clinical study: 7 to 11 year follow up. Spinal Solutions Company Brochure

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry G (2001) Aero Flex disc replacement. Presented at the First Annual Meeting of the Spine Arthroplasty Society, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee P (2001) Symposium: A critical discrepancy — a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine 26: 320–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray CD, Schonmayr R, Kavanagh SA, Assell R (1999) Prosthetic disc nucleus implants. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 12:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers WS, Bohen LMLJ, Laaper M, Vahaegen MJA (1999) Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III. 2 year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8:210–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McAfee, P.C. (2003). Classification of Heterotopic Ossification in Artificial Disc Replacement. In: Büttner-Janz, K., Hochschuler, S.H., McAfee, P.C. (eds) The Artificial Disc. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05347-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05347-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22799-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05347-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics