Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Co-Creation with Users at the Edges of Markets

  • Chapter
Book cover Collaboration with Potential Users for Discontinuous Innovation

  • 657 Accesses

Abstract

In order to identify growth potential in new markets, organizations constantly need to tap new sources of knowledge, especially from existing and novel users. Studies have shown that idea impulses which emerge from less experienced users turned out to be more original. This paper seeks to improve and conceptualize the understanding of collaboration with even more distant users at the boundaries of markets in the context of exploration for discontinuous innovation. Commonalities of different terms coined throughout the innovation management literature, such as potential or emerging users, are identified and a comprehensive definition is derived. The merits expected to arise from collaboration with these users, identified from a comprehensive literature review, are aligned to literature on the degree of innovativeness and theories from creativity research. Instead of solely classifying individuals according to the dichotomy between either being a current user or a non-user, the notion of use experience, user knowledge and domain involvement will be applied to allow for a more fine grained and individually based classification of users. Finally, significant research gaps in the collaboration with potential users are drawn out which call for researchers’ attention in order to mitigate the struggles of organizations in explorative activities towards discontinuity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact the interaction pattern with the Wii control is an identical representation of established movements in the “analogue” version of its games, e.g. swinging your arm to play tennis.

References

  • Adner, R. 2002. When are Technologies Disruptive? A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 667–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J.W., & Hutchinson, W.J. 1987. Dimensions of Consumer Expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4): 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. J., & Marquis, D. G. 1964. Positive and Negative Biasing Sets: The Effects of Prior Experience on Research Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 11(4): 158–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, S. D. 2009. Major League Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(10): 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, S., Johnson, M., Sinfield, J. & Altman, E. 2008. The Innovator’s Guide to Growth. Boston, Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, T. J., Fang, E., & Palmatier, R. W. 2011. The Effects of Customer Acquisition and Retention Orientations on a Firm’s Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2): 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercun, S. 2007. The Myths of Innovation. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. A., & Bettencourt, S. L. 2011. Innovating on the Cheap. Harvard Business Review, 89(6): 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, N., Nevin, J. R., & Wallman, J. P. 2012. Explicating Hearing the Voice of the Customer as a Manifestation of Customer Focus and Assessing its Consequences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. 2010. Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Management, 36: 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E., & Houston, M. 2003. Barriers to Matching New Technologies and Market Opportunities in Established Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2): 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. M., & Walker Jr., O. C. 2004. Selecting Influential Business-to-Business Customers in New Product Development: Relational Embeddedness and Knowledge Heterogeneity Considerations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, M. 1985. The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1): 1–16. Callahan, J., & Lasry, E. 2004. The Importance of Customer Input in the Development of Very New Products. R & D Management, 34(2):107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J., & Lasry, E. 2004. The Importance of Customer Input in the Development of Very New Products. R&D Management, 34(2):107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. 1998. Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4): 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. 1982. Expertise in Problem-solving. In R. S. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, vol. 1: 1–75. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. 2006. The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Anthony, S. D., Berstell, G., & Nitterhouse, D. 2007. Finding the Right Job For Your Product. Sloan Management Review, 48: 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C. M., & Bower, J. L. 1996. Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3): 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, V. L. P., Creswell, J. W., Green, D. O., & Shope, R. J. 2008. Mixing Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches: An Introduction to Emergent Mixed Methods Research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of Emergent Methods: 363–388. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2002. The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1095–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2003. Tight-Loose Coupling with Customers: The Enactment of Customer Orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2004. Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2007. The Process of Technological Competence Leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5): 511–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 2001. Product Innovativeness from the Firm’s Perspective: Its Dimensions and their Relation with Project Selection and Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6): 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. 1999. Misconceptions about Market Orientation. Journal of Market Focused Management, 4: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Coster, R., & Butler, C. 2005. Assessment of Proposals for New Technology Ventures in the UK: Characteristics of University Spin-off Companies. Technovation, 25(5): 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. 1997. How Scientists Think: On-Line Creativity and Conceptual Change in Science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, Discovery, and Change: 461–493: Washington D.C: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. 1945. On Problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5): whole no. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. 1997. Organizational Conditions and Levels of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6: 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J., & Reza, E. 1992. Organizational Integration and Process Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 795–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. 2004. Contextual Antecedents and Consequences of Relationships between Young Firms and Distinct Types of Dominant Exchange Partners. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5): 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, F. 1993. Innovation by Listening Carefully to Customers. Long Range Planning, 26(3): 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. 1989. User-initiated Product Innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 18(2): 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. 2011. Customer Empowerment in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., Bardhi, F., & Friedrich, C. 2007. Overcoming Consumer Resistance to Innovation. Sloan Management Review, 48: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. 2002. A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2): 110–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A., & Levesque, L. C. 2006. Meeting the Challenge of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. 2003. The Disruption Opportunity. Sloan Management Review, 44(4): 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. 2004. Can Incumbents Introduce Radical and Disruptive Innovations? Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. 2006a. Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an Assessment of Reliability and Validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. 2006b. The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., Kopalle, P. K., & Danneels, E. 2011. The Effects of Mainstream and Emerging Customer Orientations on Radical and Disruptive Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28: 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C. R., & Lei, D. 2012. Collaborative Innovation with Customers: A Review of The Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1): 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, K., & Homburg, C. 2000. Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success? Journal of Business Research, 49(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefliger, S., Jaeger, P., & von Krogh, G. 2010. Under the Radar: Industry Entry By User Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 39(9): 1198–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1991. Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing. Harvard Business Review, 69(4): 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang, C., Chen, J., & Subramian A. M. 2010. Developing Disruptive Products for Emerging Economies: Lessons from Asian cases. Research Technology Management: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J. R., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. 2006. Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science, 25(6): 687–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. 2006. The Innovator’s Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, C. 2009. Attribute-Domain Matrix: A Reverse Engineering Method for Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18: 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., Kopalle, P. K., & Novak, T. P. 2010. The Right Consumers for Better Concepts: Identifying and Using Consumers High in Emergent Nature to Further Develop New Product Concepts. Journal of Marketing Research, 47: 854–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. P., 2003. The Concept of Knowledge and how to Measure it. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4: 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, J. 2008. The Incrementalist (or, What’s the Small Idea?). Sloan Management Review, 49(4): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J. 2011. Emerging (Internet) Industry and Agglomeration: Internet Entrepreneurs Coping with Uncertainty. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(7–8): 499–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, K. R. 2010. User-Involvement and Open Innovation: The Case of Decision-Maker Openness. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14: 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12): 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. 2007. Der sichere Pfad zu Innovationen. Harvard Business Manager, 2, 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. M. 1999. Discontinuous Innovation and the Growth Paradox. Strategy & Leadership, 27: 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Archer, T. 2004. Harnessing the Creative Potential among Users. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., & Magnusson, P. R. 2010. Tuning Users’ Innovativeness During Ideation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. 2008. Key Strategies for the Successful Involvement of Customers in the Co-Creation of New Technology-Based Services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(3–4): 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Aksoy, L., Donkers, B., Venkatesan, R., Wiesel, T., & Tillmanns, S. 2010. Undervalued or Overvalued Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value. Journal of Service Research, 13(3): 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylaheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. 2011. Innovation and Internationalization as Growth Strategies: The Role of Technological Capabilities and Appropriability. International Business Review, 20(5): 508–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. K. W., Tang, E., & Yam, R. C. M. 2010. Effects of Supplier and Customer Integration on Product Innovation and Performance: Empirical Evidence in Hong Kong Manufacturers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5): 761–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettice, F., & Parekh, M. 2010. The Social Innovation Process: Themes, Challenges and Implications for Practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., & Rayport, J. F. 1997. Spark Innovation through Empathic Design. Harvard Business Review, 75: 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 40: 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C. 2007. User Involvement Competence for Radical Innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24: 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemünden, H. G. 2006. Users’ Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. R & D Management, 36: 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C. 2004. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field. Technovation, 24(9): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, G. S., Morone, J. G., & Paulson, A. S. 1996. Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: the Probe and Learn Process. California Management Review, 38(3): 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, P. R. 2009. Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology-Based Services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5): 578–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascitelli, R. 2000. From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation. Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 17: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., Keil, T., & Tukiainen, T. 2006. Extracting Value from Corporate Venturing. Sloan Management Review, 48(1): 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. A., & Dacin, P. A. 1996. The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3): 219–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. E. 1999 (Ed.): Social Creativity, vol. 1: 1–45 Cresskill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, J., & Sutherland, D. 1998. New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3): 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, E. J., Hillebrand, B, de Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. G. M. 2012. Strategic Value Assessment and Explorative Learning Opportunities with Customers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1): 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, W. C., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. 1994. Consumer Knowledge Assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipsen, K., Damgaard, T., & Johnsen, R. E. 2008. Suppliers’ Opportunity Enactment through the Development of Valuable Capabilities. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(1): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. 2000. Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1): 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. 1989. Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing 6, no. 2, pp. 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S. E., & Brentani, U. 2004. The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, R., & Gurtner, S. 2011. Enabling Disruptive Innovations through the Use of Customer Analysis Methods. Review of Managerial Science, 5(4): 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. 1956. Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53: 367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. 1974,. Sappho Updated: Project Sappho Phase II. Research Policy, 3: 204–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. 1995. The Psychoeconomic View of Creative Work in Groups and Organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4: 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., Prandelli, E., & Verona, G. 2003. The Power of Innomediation. Mit Sloan Management Review, 44(2): 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. 2005. Social Emergence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. 2008. When is a Disruptive Innovation Disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4): 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. A., Osgood, D. W., Peterson, C. 1979. Cognitive Structure: Theory and Measurement of Individual Differences. V.H. Winston & Sons, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. S. 1985. The Role of the Interaction between the User and the Manufacturer in Medical Equipment Innovation. R & D Management, 15: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Mohr, J. J. 2006. Successful Development and Commercialization of Technological Innovation: Insights Based on Strategy Type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1998. Customer-led and Market Oriented: Let’s not Confuse the Two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10): 1001–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenburg, S. 2004. Creativity in Communication: A Theoretical Framework for Collaborative Product Creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13: 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A., & Johnson, B. 2008. Emergent Techniques in the Gathering and Analysis of Mixed Method Data. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of Emergent Methods: 389–413. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. 1996. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hende, E. A., & Schoormans, J. P. L. 2012. The Story is as Good as the Real Thing: Early Customer Input on Product Applications of Radically New Technologies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4): 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. 2004. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer, R. W. 1998. Key Factors Affecting Customer Evaluation of Discontinuous New Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2):136–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, F. S., van der Lugt, R., & Stappers, P. J. 2007. Sharing User Experiences in the Product Innovation Process: Participatory Design Needs Participatory Communication. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32(7): 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. 1994. Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem-solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40: 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D. W., Orr, L. M., & Bush, V. D. 2011. Improving Customer-Focused Marketing Capabilities and Firm Financial Performance via Marketing Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(5): 736–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Parboteeah, K. P., Riesenhuber, F., & Hoegl, M. 2011. Championship Behaviors and Innovations Success: An Empirical Investigation of University Spin-Offs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4): 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. 1995. What’s Old About New Ideas? In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach: 157–178. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, N. T., & Hunsaker, B. T. 2011. Finding Great Ideas in Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review, 89(9): 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. 1999. Creativity and Knowledge: A Challenge to Theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity: 226–250. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1985. Measuring the Involvement Construct. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12: 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Martin Hewing

Authors
  1. Martin Hewing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Hölzle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hewing, M., Hölzle, K. (2014). Co-Creation with Users at the Edges of Markets. In: Collaboration with Potential Users for Discontinuous Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03753-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation