Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Information-Processing Analysis of Perception and Action

  • Chapter
Relationships Between Perception and Action

Abstract

How much behavior can psychological theory be expected to predict or fully explain? A recent New Realist theory of philosophy of science allows for predictability in the laboratory, but not in the naturally varying environment (Manicas Secord, 1983). Complexity of the natural setting far exceeds what any scientific theory could hope to accommodate. Theories will have predictive power only in the laboratory in which the complexity of everyday life can be simplified, measured, and controlled. Our point of departure is even more pessimistic in that the complexity of the prototypical psychology experiment might exceed any theory’s predictive power. Revising the dictum that “data without theory are meaningless” (Coombs, unpublished), laboratory data might exceed the constraints demanded by theory (even reasonably correct theory).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H.Heuer A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annett, J. (1983). Motor learning: A review. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, K. Schmidt (Eds.), Motor behavior: Programming, control, and acquisition. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F.G., Townsend, J.T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimbaum, M.H. (1981). Thinking and feeling: A skeptical review. American Psychologist, 36, 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor–oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692–

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D.E., Gregory, M. (1962). Donders’ B- and C -reactions and S- R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 575–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. (1977). Visual pattern in fluent word identification. In A.S. Reber D.L. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. The Proceedings of the CUNY Conferences (pp. 143–182 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L.R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chistovich, L.A., Fant, G., Serpa- Leitao, A., Tjemlund, P. (1966). Mimicking of synthetic vowels (Speech Transmission Laboratory Reports, STL- QPSR, 2 ). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J.E. (1982). Two ecological perspectives: Gibson vs. Shaw and Turvey. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., MacLeod, C.M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622–639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1967). Latency of different verbal responses to the same stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, XIX, 353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funnell, E., Allport, A. (1987). Non-linguistic cognition and word meanings: neuropsychological exploration of common mechanisms. In D.A. Allprot, D.G. Mackay, W. Prinz, E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Shared mechanisms in listening, speaking, reading and writing. Academic: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D.R. (1985). Skilled motor performance at variable rates: A composite view of motor control (Chip 124 ). Center for Human Information Processing. San Diego, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.G. (1972). On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.G., Shulman, H.G. (1973). On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellyer, S. (1963). Stimulus-response coding and amount of information as determinants of reaction time. Journal of Experimental psychology, 65, 521–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hick, W.E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A.W., Rosenbaum, D.A., Gordon, A.M., Campbell, J.A. (1984). Stimulus-response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 724–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original publication 1890 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J.J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L.S. Cermak F.I.M. Crack (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M.A., Kosslyn, S.M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S.W. (1986). Motor control. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. II: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–60 ). New Yoik: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Kay, B.A. (1985). Information and control: A macroscopic of perception-action coupling. In H. Heuer A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perceptives on perception and action. Amsterdam: North–Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Kay, B.A. (1987). Information and control: A macroscopic analysis of perception– action coupling. In H. Heuer A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferson, M.W. (1975). On the interaction between memory scanning and response set. Memory and Cognition, 3, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Heij, W., van der Heijden, A.H.C., Schreuder, R. (1985). Semantic priming and Stroop–like interference in word-naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.N., Reddish, P.E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics. Nature, 293, 293–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions I. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, L.E., El–Zahhar, N., Alcom, M.B. (1985). Exceptions to Hicks law: Explorations with a response duration measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupker, S.J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture–word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupker, S.J., Katz, A.N. (1982). Can automatic picture processing influence word judgments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 418–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupp, U., Hauske, G., Wolf, W. (1976). Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 76, 969–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P.T., Secord, P.F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1975a). Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand- McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (Ed.). (1975b). Understanding language: An information processing analysis of speech perception, reading and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1979). Reading and listening (Tutorial paper). In P.A. Kolers, M. Wrolstad, H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1, pp. 331–354 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M. (1983). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus–response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference. Perception Psychophysics, 33, 266–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W.J. (1961). Loudness and reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 19, 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W.J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, 1. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P., Posner, M.I. (1984). Privileged loops from percept to act. In H. Bouma D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 55–66 ). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P., McLaughlin, C., Nimmo-Smith, I. (1985). Information encapsulation and automaticity: Evidence from the visual control of finely timed actions. In M.I. Posner O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 391–406 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.E., Yantis, S., Osman, A.M., Smith, J.E.K. (1984). Discrete versus continuous models of response preparation: A reaction-time analysis. In S. Komblum J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, R.E., Konick, A., Troxell, N., McPherson, S. (1965). Information and reaction time for “naming” responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstad, H. Bourn a (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1, pp. 259– 268 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, G.H. (1960). Choice reaction times for skilled responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, G.H., Rhoades, M.U. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1964). Visual search. Scientific American, 210, 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, R., Umilta, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception Psychophysics, 35, 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K.R., Ogden, W.C. (1981). Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 518–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H.H. (1974). Discrete and continuous processes in computers and brains. In M. Conrad, W. Guttinger, M.D. Cin (Eds.), Physics and mathematics of the nervous system, (pp. 128–148 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, J.M. (1985). Shadows, echos and auditory analysis of speech. Speech Communication, 4, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, J. (1978). Involuntary automatic processing in color-naming task. Perception Psychophysics, 24, 130–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B.H. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of two kinds of ambiguous speech stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B.H., Williams, D.R. (1985). Categorical trends in vowel imitation: Preliminary observations from a replication experiment. Speech Communication, 4, 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H.L. (1984). Does current evidence from dissociation experiments favor the episodic/semantic distinction? Commentary of Tulving, E., Precis of elements of episodic memory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. Lloyd, B.B. (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., Gordon, A.M., Stillings, N.A., Feinstein, M.H. (1987). Stimulus–response compatibility in the programming of speech. Memory and Cognition, 15, 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (1983). Reassessing the automaticity–control distinction: Item recognition as a paradigm case. Psychological Review, 90, 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T.A. (1981). Converging evidence for information-processing stages: A comparative– influence stage analysis method. Acta Psychologica, 47, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A.F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G.E. Stelmach J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing. I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert, R. (1983). Latent network theory: Scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 353–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R.G. Krueger, L.E. (1983). Effect of similarity of surround on target-letter processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J.R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J.R., Small, A.M., Jr., Ziglar, R.A., Craft, J.L. (1970). Response interference in an information processing task: sensory versus perceptual factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.H. (1980). The primacy of visual information in the analysis of letter strings. Perception Psychophysics, 27, 153–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soetens, E., Deboeck, M., Hueting, J. (1984). Automatic aftereffects in two–choice reaction time: A mathematical representation of some concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: new findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.A. (1977). Time course of context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 404–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichner, W.H., Krebs, M.J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Hoopen, G., Akerboom, S., Raaymakers, E. (1982). Vibrotactual choice reaction time, tactile receptor systems and ideomotor compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 50, 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J. (1973). Reaction time measurements in the study of memory processes: Theory and data. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 7, 43–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J. (1975). The components of response latency in simple human information processing tasks. In P.M.A. Rabbitt S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J., Amrhein, P.C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychologica Review, 96, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J.T., Ashby, F.G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A.M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282– 299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M.T., Kugler, P.N. (1984). Information and the ecological approach to perception and action. In H.T.A. Whiting (Ed.), Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umilta, C., Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M.I. Posner O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance. XI: Mechanisms of attention (pp. 457–471 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virzi, R.A., Egeth, H.E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory and Cognition, 13, 304–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. D. W. Massaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Psychologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 8640, 4800, Bielefeld, Germany

    Odmar Neumann  & Wolfgang Prinz  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Massaro, D.W. (1990). An Information-Processing Analysis of Perception and Action. In: Neumann, O., Prinz, W. (eds) Relationships Between Perception and Action. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75348-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation