Skip to main content

The Myth of the Passage of Time

  • Chapter
The Study of Time

Summary

The main purpose of this paper is to point out that the technique, familiar to physicists, of adopting various representations of physical phenomena for various purposes is convenient (and, I believe, necessary) in order to clarify some of the aspects of time that have been regarded as mysterious. Two representations are distinguished: the one that physics always uses and I have called atemporal, and the temporal one implicit in ordinary language and metaphor and most of the philosophical speculation with which I am familiar. The myth mentioned in the title is the idea that this representation somehow is time itself. The representation are explained by the use of pictures, which are to be distinguished from the representations they illustrate, and an attempt is made to clarify some old questions by their use.

Le temps s’en va, le temps s’en va, madame. Las: le temps, non, mais nous nous en allons.

Ronsard

Absolute, true, and mathematical time, of itself and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to anything external. Newton

The objective world simply is, it does not happen. Only to the gaze of my consciousness, crawling upward along the life-line of my body, does a section of the world come to life as a fleeting image in space which continually changes in time. Weyl

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feynman, R. P.: Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 749. The introductory discussion is accessible to the nonspecialist. The same idea had been suggested but not exploited earlier by E. G. C. Stueckelberg.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Nambu, Y.: Progr. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto) 5, (1950) 82.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Springer-Verlag, Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, D. (1972). The Myth of the Passage of Time. In: Fraser, J.T., Haber, F.C., Müller, G.H. (eds) The Study of Time. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65387-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65387-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-65389-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-65387-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics