Skip to main content

Integrating Site-Specific Biophysical and Economic Models to Assess Trade-offs in Sustainable Land Use and Soil Quality

  • Chapter
Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

In this paper we describe the sustainability of a production system in terms of trade-offs between present and future outcomes such as crop productivity. Based on the observed site-specificity of the relationship between soil characteristics and productivity, we hypothesise that to accurately assess the sustainability of an agricultural production system we must measure the interactions between farmers’ management decisions and soil quality on a site-specific basis and then aggregate the resulting relationships. The analysis of linked, site-specific economic and biophysical models shows that soil quality at a point in space and time depends on both fixed site characteristics and on the history of farmers’ management decisions. Aggregation then shows that both on farm productivity and potential productivity are functions of parameters that define the distributions of physical and economic variables in a region. Using this result, we show that measurements of sustainability based on ‘representative’ data such as mean soil characteristics will generally be biased and thus may lead to inaccurate assessment of a system’s productivity and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antle, J.M. (1996): Methodological issues in assessing the potential impacts of climate change on agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 80, 67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J.M. & S.M. Capalbo (1991): Physical and economic model integration for measurement of the environmental impacts of agricultural chemical use. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20, 68–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J.M. & S.M. Capalbo (2000): Econometric-process models for integrated assessment of agricultural production systems. Research Discussion Paper No. 40, Trade Research Center, Montana State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J.M. & R.E. Just (1991): Effects of commodity programs on resource use and the environment. in commodity and resource policies. In: R.E. Just & N. Bockstael (Eds.) Agricultural systems. Springer-Verlag Publishing Co., New York, 97–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J.M., C.C. Crissman & S.M. Capalbo (1998): Tradeoffs in policy analysis: conceptual foundations and disciplinary integration. In: C.C. Crissman, J.M. Antle & S.M. Capalbo (Eds.) Economic, environmental, and health trade-offs in agriculture: pesticides and the sustainability of Andean potato production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J. (1997): Soil environmental quality: a European perspective. Journal of Environmental Quality 26, 26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J., N.H. Batjes & J.J.R. Groot (1998): Exploring land quality effects on world food supply. Geoderma 86, 43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1976): A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin 32, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, I.W. & P.J. Parks (1997): Land use with heterogeneous land quality: an application of an area base model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerink, N. (1994): Population growth, income distribution, and economic development: theory, methodology, and empirical results. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, E. & D. Zilberman (1978): Examination of environmental policies using production and pollution microparameter distributions. Econometrica 46, 739–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huinink, J.T.M. (1998): Soil quality requirements for use in urban environments. Soil & Tillage Research 47, 157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just R.E. & J.M. Antle (1990): Interactions between agricultural and environmental policies: a conceptual framework. American Economic Review 80, 1.97–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, R.E., D. Zilberman & E. Hochman (1983): Estimation of multicrop production functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65, 770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., L.M. Kimble, R.F. Follett & C.V. Cole (1998): The potential of US cropland to sequester C and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynam, J.K. & R.W. Herdt (1992): Sense and sustainability: sustainability as an objective in international agricultural research. In: J.L. Moock & R.E. Rhoades (Eds.) Diversity, farmer knowledge, and sustainability. Food Systems and Agrarian Change Series. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, K.E. (1983): An economic model of soil conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65, 83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutsaers H.J.W. & Z. Wang (1999): Are simulation models ready for agricultural research in developing countries? Agronomy Journal 91, 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman, L.R., R.T.A. Hakkeling & W.G. Sombroek (1991): World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Opaluch, J.J. & K. Segerson (1991): Aggregate analysis of site-specific pollution problems: the case of groundwater contamination from agricultural pesticides. Northeast Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20, 83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri, C., J. Dumanski, A. Hamblin & A. Young (1995): Land quality indicators. World Bank Discussion Papers #315, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoorvogel, J., J.M. Antle, C.C. Crissman, & W. Bowen (2000): The trade-off model: a policy decision support system for agriculture. Quantitative Approaches in Systems Analysis, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji, G.Y., G. Uehara & S. Balas (1994): DSSAT v3. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen, M. (1999): The development of land use and land management and their effect upon soils in processes of mechanical erosion and compaction. M.Sc thesis Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands & CIP, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. & K. Segerson (1995): The impact of policies and land characteristics on potential groundwater pollution in Wisconsin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 1033–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antle, J.M., Stoorvogel, J. (2001). Integrating Site-Specific Biophysical and Economic Models to Assess Trade-offs in Sustainable Land Use and Soil Quality. In: Heerink, N., van Keulen, H., Kuiper, M. (eds) Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57558-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57558-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1351-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57558-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics