Skip to main content

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knee Joint Arthroplasty
  • 2178 Accesses

Abstract

If arthritis is confined to one compartment of the knee joint, it may be difficult to decide whether to perform unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UK) or TKA. This is because widely varying results of UK have been reported in literature. There has been renewed interest in UK after Repicci introduced the minimally invasive techniques for UK. UK has certain advantages over TKA, and good results can be achieved in well-selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackroyd CE, Chir B. Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, et al. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89-B:310–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aglietti P, Insall JN, Walker PS, et al. A new patellar prosthesis. Design and application. Clin Orthop. 1975;107:175–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amis AA, Senavongse W, Darcy P. Biomechanics of patellofemoral joint prostheses. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:20–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arciero FA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three to nine year follow-up study. Clin Orthop. 1988;236:60–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argensen JN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. An European perspective. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1421–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenson JN, Benkeddache YC, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:2235–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM. Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 1995;321:162–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, et al. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1049–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argenson JN, Murray D, Coon TM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: international roundtable discussion. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1005–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenson JN, Parratte S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A European perspective. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-B:1126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae DK, Yoon KH, Ko BW, et al. Survivorship of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Korean Knee Soc. 2001;13:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes CL, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee replacement. In: Scott WN, editor. The knee. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby;1994. p. 1097–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett WP, Scott RD. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69-A:1328–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, et al. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89-B:1597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berend KR, Morris MJ, Skeels MD, et al. Perioperative complications of simultaneous versus staged unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2011;469:168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6-to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:50–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, et al. Patellofemoral replacement. 1979. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:3–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson LV, Albrektsson BE, Regner LR. Minimally invasive surgery vs conventional exposure using the Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized radiostereometric study. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:47–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NO. Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital. Clin Orthop. 1991;273:165–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis BD, Komistek R, Scuderi GR, et al. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;83-A:104–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehring TK, Berend KR, Hofmann S, et al. Advanced technologies in performing total knee arthroplasty: roundtable discussion. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1283–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz W, Scott RD. Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1408–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz W, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 988–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick C, Fitzpatrick D, Lee J, et al. Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee. 2007;14:138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, et al. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89-A:519–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesell MW, Tria Jr AJ. MIS unicondylar knee arthroplasty: surgical approach and early results. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, DA Benson MK, et al. The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70-B:692–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Pandit H, Jenkins C, et al. The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B:469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther T, Hurray DW, Miller R, et al. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996;3:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, et al. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis G. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66-B:682–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;120:83–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali AA, Rodrick DJ, Malberg MI, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, editor. The adult knee. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 1111–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra S, Smith TO, Berko B, et al. Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93-B:777–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SN, Smith TO, Sprenger De Rover WB, et al. Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93-B:476–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick BJ, Rout R, Bottomley NJ, et al. The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92-B:374–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy W, White R. Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty of the knee: postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop. 1991;271:96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop. 1987;221:278–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman HJ, Driessen APPM, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85-B:836–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai CH, Rand JA. Revision of failed unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;287:193–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60-A:182–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskin RS. Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, et al. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:797–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, design considerations. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:158–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1440–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1010–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotke PA, Lonner JH, Nelson CL. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the third compartment. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20 Suppl 2:4–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinus HH. Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopedics. 1979;2:119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig S, Elguindy A, Servien E, et al. 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database Analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop. 2012;470:84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop. 1973;94:242–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:14–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullaji AB, Sharma A, Marawar S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional recovery and radiographic results with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, et al. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80-B:983–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80-B:862–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noticewala MS, Geller JA, Lee JH, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improve function more than total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27 Suppl 8:99–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, et al. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: Five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92-B:56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73-A:186–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93-B:198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrattte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, et al. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2012;470:61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:13–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins TR, Gunekle W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:293–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:970–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachala SR, Sierra RJ. Unicompartmental, bicompartmental, or tricompartmental arthritis of the knee: algorithm for surgical management. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1026–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repicci J, Eberle R. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:20–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:408–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:17–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80-B:850–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In: Scott RD, editor. Total knee arthroplasty. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006. p. 123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott RD, Cobb AG. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, eight to twelve year follow-up with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1991;271:96–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. Minimally invasive surgery for unicondylar arthroplasty of the knee. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1430–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song MH, Kim BH, Ahn SJ, et al. Early complications after minimally invasive mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1281–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streit MR, Walker T, Bruckner T, et al. Mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford domed tibial component: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94-A:1356–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stukenborg-Colsman C, Worth CT, Lazovic D, et al. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis; 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee. 2001;8:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swank M, Stulberg SD, Jiganti J, et al. The natural history of unicompartmental arthroplasty: an eight year follow-up study with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1993;286:130–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swienckowski JJ, Pennington DW. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A Suppl 1:131–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, et al. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five to ten year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83-B:696–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, et al. Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1066–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vince KG, Cyran LT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19 Suppl 1:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside LA. Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20 Suppl 2:2–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cho, W. (2014). Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. In: Knee Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39389-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39389-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39389-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics