Skip to main content

A Holistic Model of Innovation Network Management: Action Research in Elderly Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications

Abstract

Network management, in particular innovation network management, is a topic of increasing interest and scope. Research on innovation network management has offered various, but ultimately partial, theoretical and practical contributions. Trust and commitment have been identified as the basic elements of a functioning network, and we know that there are certain factors that foster or discourage their existence. Networks are different; each different network has its particular challenges. Indeed, practice-based innovations involve specific challenges for network management. Our aim is to look at innovation network management from a holistic perspective, bringing together the relevant but scattered viewpoints and contributions. We use action research to look at what managers can do to manage an innovation network. The resulting holistic model rises from one particular practice-based innovation context – elderly health care in Finland – but we argue that it is applicable in other contexts and innovation types as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2006). Innovation in care services for the elderly. Service Industries Journal, 26(3), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., Olk, P., & Ring, P. (2000). Formation processes of RandD consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J., & Themessl-Huber, M. (2007). The cyclical process of action research: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Action Research, 5(4), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (1991). Qualitative methods in management research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (2003). New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: International Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). The regional development platform method as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1085–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2005). Knowledge management in regional innovation networks: The case of Lahti, Finland. European Planning Studies, 13(5), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmaakorpi, V., & Mutanen, A. (2008). Knowledge production in networked practice-based innovation processes – Interrogative model as a methodological approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P., Huxham, C., & Ring, P. S. (2008). Managing inter-organizational relations. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. S. Ring (Eds.), The handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 391–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1994a). Organizational commitment: One of many commitments or key mediating construct? Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1568–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1994b). Relationship marketing in the era of network competition. Marketing Management, 3(1), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (2004). The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M., & Stainsby, L. (2000). Managing public sector network organizations. Public Money & Management, 20(1), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvensivu, T., & Möller, K. (2009). Metatheory of network management: A contingency approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6), 654–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanlou, N., & Peter, E. (2005). Participatory action research: Considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine, 60(10), 2333–2340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, T., Pajunen, K., & Kulmala, H. (2008). Co-evolution of trust and dependence in customer–supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(8), 910–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37(3), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations (electronic ed., pp. 94–107). Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. P. (2001). Collaboration through network structures for community building efforts. National Civic Review, 90(3), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizational principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (1995). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K., & Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of strategic nets – New modes of value creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K., Rajala, A., & Svahn, S. (2005). Strategic business nets – Their type and management. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1274–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G., Bachmann, R., & Lee, S. (2004). Understanding organizational trust – Foundations, constellations, and issues of operationalisation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(6), 556–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2007). Social capital, institutions and trust. Review of Social Capital, LXV(1), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykänen, K., Järvensivu, T., & Möller, K. (2009). Towards a more social perspective of network management: An action research study on trust and commitment. Electronic conference proceedings of the 25th IMP Conference. www.impgroup.org/uploads/papers/7356.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2011.

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Isett, K. R., & Milward, H. B. (2004). Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P., & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F., & Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S. (2002). Social construction research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 3(4), 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2004). Lewin’s action research model as a tool for theory building: A case study from South Africa. Action Research, 2(2), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand, D. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Academy of Finland and the European Social Fund. We would like to thank the editors for their insightful and detailed comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Järvensivu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Järvensivu, T., Nykänen, K., Rajala, R. (2012). A Holistic Model of Innovation Network Management: Action Research in Elderly Health Care. In: Melkas, H., Harmaakorpi, V. (eds) Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics